/meta/ - Suggestions

>>3122 (OP) 
why the fuck would you make an entire board just for frogs, they're not even bad.
also 4chan /b/ is just gay porn, don't lie

>>3122 (OP) 
the board you're wishing for already exists 
https://ourchan.org/hell/catalog.html

How_to_DO.jpg
[Hide] (23.5KB, 490x612)

>>3096 (OP) 
Looks great Anon.
Post it in /fit/ as OP and keep the password.
Then ask one of the MODS to stick a tack in it.
Over the course of the board's progression, you can post a revision thread for any needed updates.
(You WILL Have some arguing to do, I'd guess, seeing as how so many have wildly varying opinions on this.)
Make it yOURS, fren.

54b708babec3d406595e412b4a019e7a3a648ce0bc412eb2fd9d26cdbc707b66.png
[Hide] (344KB, 549x896)

>>3096 (OP) 
appreciate it anon. i'll pin it

>>398
>This is my position as well. I'm here because 4chan is unusable, not because I want to join the furthest right
The furthest right (which in reality, is simply right-wing. Conservatives are not right-wing, but central leftists and yesterday's radical progressives) are the leaders of free-speech and self-expression. You don't need to be right-wing to post here, but you do need to accept that all free-speech zones are de facto right-wing in the modern era. In other words, deal with it. I'm not even saying that out of being mean or mockingly.

As for fedposting, that's a term that's overused all the time. In almost all cases, no actual crimes are committed nor any grounds for urging people to commit crimes could be found (under current U.S. law anyways). Is also begs the question: if you are going to be imprisoned for posting frogs, posting info-graphs, or posting your observations or opinions, why aren't you committing crimes to overthrow the archons of the hell-world you are already living within?

>>460
That post came from a time when various users seemed to be trying to kick people like me off the site for being soft. The end  paragraph is totally garbled and doesn't make sense if you read it actually.

What I mean by frens, was when I looked at it they seemed to be talking about actionable methods of vague criminality. Such as how to spray slogans using paper bags as cover, the hiv needle for draft officers meme, all kinds of shit which would inevitably be put under suspicion.  I don't recommend those kinds of discussions, although we seem to be doing okay so far. 

[Country X] has laws which could jail people for life if certain cuck moves weren't done intellectually. I'm sure you get it, depending on location people only get so much mental allowance in their public statements

0c0a459f08e8b111d694ae098fda2e305c98b42c.jpg
[Hide] (133KB, 476x640)

>>198
> Well, one way would be to not have too many boards, but to let people post and if there are frequent enough posts of some type that it merits it's own board then it gets made

This is the right way.

Just in the recent months since ourchan sprang up many new boards were requested, but yet, very few posters exist on the new boards.

A suggestion to put this into practice is to require a few things for the creation of new boards, not only to have an indication of how much demand exists for them, but also for the sanity of admins.

Here are some requirements for new boards:

1. At least two threads must exist on >>>/gen/ about the board topic
2. The threads must have consistent activity for at least three months
4. The threads must have more than one poster

Frenschan was a site for peaceful farming advice.

>>196 (OP) 
>Because when people wanted to discuss those topics, they would make the post about that topic on /pol/ rather than on /art/, for example

you can blame 4chan's moderation policies post 2015 for this.  After Trump announced he was running for president /pol/ became a board for closeted racially bigoted newfags to post whatever they felt like posting about rather than post on the appropriate board;  /pol/ became their safespace hugbox.  they continued this practice on every image board that was created afterwards.  What they fail to grasp is that these sites were created by /pol/yards and are "/pol/" in their entirety - you're not going to be b& at any of those sites for saying "faggot nigger kike" on a non /pol/ board like you would on 4chan.  
As mods here continue to move offtopic threads to appropriate boards those boards will thrive if OP wants genuine discussion is not trying to derail /pol/

>>1404
>>1405
Certainly not. I don't do anything for free.

>>1403 (OP) 
I have to agree with this. I don't know the difference and I can't be bothered to learning the delicate subtleties between the two.

The site is a honeypot. 
Do with it what you will.

>>1525
halfchan /b/ used to have IDs but now they don't.  no flags.
/bant/ on halfchan has both.
if both boards are the same here then there's not really a point.

>>1403 (OP) 
Bant was originally made just for a place to move off topic threads from /pol/ to

>>3019
>You are welcome to call anyone a niggerfaggot on my site.
Kek.

1c560c63e825fda4581f473d45a53c6318fc7486401cd7408e3b898816971ecd.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 735x600)

>>3019
>The meta board is for contacting admins
I know, this was my attempt at a joke>>3014. Thank you mighty niggerfaggot in the sky, for your prompt and courteous reply. I will go forth attacking namefaggots, and tripfaggots on /pol/, until you wish me to stop. Thank you for giving us ourchan, and I appreciate you.

Sent from my iPhone

>>3021
>Sent from my iPhone

kek a true faggot

>>3022
Could we get a ruling here:
https://ourchan.org/meta/thread/2985.html

NEW_FAGGOTRY!!.jpg
[Hide] (31.7KB, 480x360)

The_PROPHESY_is_fulfilled.jpg
[Hide] (97.4KB, 500x519)

FROGKING.jpg
[Hide] (142.3KB, 1024x682)

>>3023
Hey! I only namefagged for that thread.
I was just showing a n00Fren how it's done,( Thread creation, Not nameFaggotry,) since I'd be a hypocrite not to considering how much I've espoused leading by example and Not telling N00-Ouryans to LURK MOAR then give them nothing to Lurk for..
Also, it was a good question but off topic IT(hat)T

Bampu. Important to take care of mods. Flags and banners are great, but we need to prevent shill campaign from havimg any influence whatsoever from this place, if we can.

>>2922 (OP) 
that's my thread.  quit being a faggot.

>>2948
>>2943
Out and about but yeah I can do it. Like space said, it's not hard. I remember that list but the data wasn't perfect. Personally I'd prefer to block gov owned IPs but I'm fine with "yellow badging" them, lmao

ad6d877b12ebe4b305abbd50c1217e11485b53bf3873ba70b3be8f807740736a.png
[Hide] (353B, 16x11)

>>2951
>Personally I'd prefer to block gov owned IPs but I'm fine with "yellow badging" them, lmao
Funny, I had a flag designed for just this purpose. Would be hilarious if it was retroactively applied to any posters that belong in /hell/.

>>2952
How about yellowbadging vpns and suspected/uncertain gov ips. If the person using the suspected gov ip is a glow fag, permaban it.

>>2952
Holy fucking kek lets do this

>>2956
>>2957
Personally I don't like this. VPNs are for privacy and we can easily see what VPN is and issue temp blocks. One of the things we get compliments on is VPNs being allowed. I really think flags should be Tor only since Tor is free, and hard to partially censor, so it makes sense.

1601133023622.jpg
[Hide] (169.2KB, 1024x626)

>>2914
Thanks AGAIN guys, you glorious Bastards are doing a great job.
DON'T be alarmed at the massive PID drop--was to be expected.
95%+ of the feedback I saw over the last 6 days was extremely positive, and even though I know you guys were getting bombarded with SeePee from glowniggers and JIDF fags trying to control leakage, I only ever saw ONE OP with links slip through the cracks.
That's a Tremendous WIN
I saw the selfsame pic being posted in the last days of FC--but that's not a harbinger, just an indication that they were bringing out the BIG GUNS.

>>2915
Based, thanks for the vote of confidence anon. We'll make sure to keep it up and stay grinding. WAGMI

>>2914
I appreciate it man, only detriment plagung this site is the guy going around shitting on all new threads

>>2944
It's greatly a

>>2944
It's greatly appreciated**

If they do this trivial crap before giving us our onion URL I'm gonna say wtf bruh

>>2500
>>2493 (OP) 
Bump

>>2493 (OP) 

Site admin here. I will look into adding RSS. Its not currently a feature afik.

>>2864
Reminder that the glowies' favorite tactic to destroy the original /pol/ was simply shitposting, slide threads, and anti intellectualism ("/pol/ was never meant to be a serious board")

>>2853 (OP) 
especially if there's legit source

>>2853 (OP) 
They should be publicly beaten in the town square before being banned

1587713251255.jpg
[Hide] (99.3KB, 1200x797)

>>2863
Absolutely.
It's /ourjob/ to cultivate the culture and etiquette we want here.
Leading by example is no longer "Gud Enuff", at least in beginning stages, some spoonfeeding will be necessary.
Posting spoilered front ends of obvious and suspected data harvesting sites like YT, and most all news sites should be the norm.
Most people aren't even aware that those little FAGMAN SocMed widgets are pulling info. Also posting LURK MOAR is a good thing, but only when there is info and method to be gleaned from doing so.
IDK if there is going to be a donate button/banner somewhere, but eventually there should be, if for nothing else maintenance of the soon to be /Our/chives.
In addition, dropping safe(er) share site URLs for large video files and PDFs should become common practice, as well as reminding anons and informing N00bFrens to always use Archive.is links,(I don't know about the need to spoiler those,) in addition to the spoilered Orig. link.
Fedjacketing and Glownigger infiltration is always harder when the board culture promotes cooperativeness and info sharing,(They fucking HATE that), over the Stinky Onion FAGGOT ITT's approach which is 
>"FUCK EVERYBODY!!1! You FUGGIN' MIDWITS!! So NOW IMMA GOAN TRYIN' TA SHAME YO FOOS INTO BEING DIPSHITZ!!LOL KEKS!!"
Pathetic.
They aren't sending their best.
A scant moment of critical thought and more than a NIGGER's unnerstannin' of the digital world shows you just how absurdly out of touch these Kikesuckers are.
>Thinks TwatterB0ts are the "only major public news source" and isn't in fact MSM baby-bird vomited back and forth amongst Lusers
Lel

The_beetings_will_continue_until_morale_improves.jpg
[Hide] (47.6KB, 463x311)

>>2867
KEK!