/meta/ - Suggestions

Well, one way would be to not have too many boards, but to let people post and if there are frequent enough posts of some type that it merits it's own board then it gets made. The site itself can also periodically make suggestions for people to check out the other boards.

>>196 (OP)  We are turning into a white nationalist board as well which we support. So the the activity will be centered arround /pol/. We are trying to keep the number of boards small, with the idea that someone can make a thread and if there is enough activity we'll make a board for it.

I don't think there's any way to prevent this. When we made this site the goal was mainly for a better /pol/ anyways.

The team has connections in the crypto space so we hope to also be onboarding people from there to keep /biz/ active.

>>196 (OP) 
this is one of the reasons I kept frenschan as a backup it was a decent board but the wignat stuff was a bit over the top I like 4chins for more then just /pol/ and I hope this doesn't try to become like frens but attempts to be a more rounded chan.

But 4chan has almost become usable at this point . I think the solution is to not let this place get as extreme as frens did but try to have it a more rounded image board.

>>203 Trying to stay well rounded is a good goal. We'll get more traffic that way.

>>204
frens was interesting to visit but I rarely posted there. I would lurk some threads. It just felt a bit try hard with all the imagery and like it was panting a target on itself. I felt less inclined to post too because it seemed a bit uptight on what was exceptable. I don't feel that way here it feels more like a chan and better version of 4chan but it has that comfy familiarity that to me personally frens lacked. I think here is going in the right direction and keeping my finger crossed that it stays that way because I'm settling in here.

>>203
4cuck is unbearable now. They are literally sucking off miga and Zion don in nearly every thread.

>>396
Yeah I know its like it got a gorgillion times worse in the last few months with the wait times ecr but there is still garbage its unbarable . The reason I'm over here . But I still use a lot of boards outside of /pol/ diy his x yeah I like schizo stuff .

>>203
This is my position as well. I'm here because 4chan is unusable, not because I want to join the furthest right. People talk up frenschan. Well, when I went there a quick skim revealed it was a bunch of fedposting geared towards people seeking a jail sentence. And then I left. 4pol is a variety of people and groups, including but not only that constituency.  This site will only be successful if it imports the entire variety of people who comprised the old one. Otherwise you may as well write me out, since I'm not interested in playing gardener with a tree destined to be sickly and stunted. Which is what all the legitimate rather than ironic "far right" political scene looks like

>>398
>This is my position as well. I'm here because 4chan is unusable, not because I want to join the furthest right
The furthest right (which in reality, is simply right-wing. Conservatives are not right-wing, but central leftists and yesterday's radical progressives) are the leaders of free-speech and self-expression. You don't need to be right-wing to post here, but you do need to accept that all free-speech zones are de facto right-wing in the modern era. In other words, deal with it. I'm not even saying that out of being mean or mockingly.

As for fedposting, that's a term that's overused all the time. In almost all cases, no actual crimes are committed nor any grounds for urging people to commit crimes could be found (under current U.S. law anyways). Is also begs the question: if you are going to be imprisoned for posting frogs, posting info-graphs, or posting your observations or opinions, why aren't you committing crimes to overthrow the archons of the hell-world you are already living within?

>>460
That post came from a time when various users seemed to be trying to kick people like me off the site for being soft. The end  paragraph is totally garbled and doesn't make sense if you read it actually.

What I mean by frens, was when I looked at it they seemed to be talking about actionable methods of vague criminality. Such as how to spray slogans using paper bags as cover, the hiv needle for draft officers meme, all kinds of shit which would inevitably be put under suspicion.  I don't recommend those kinds of discussions, although we seem to be doing okay so far. 

[Country X] has laws which could jail people for life if certain cuck moves weren't done intellectually. I'm sure you get it, depending on location people only get so much mental allowance in their public statements

0c0a459f08e8b111d694ae098fda2e305c98b42c.jpg
[Hide] (133KB, 476x640)

>>198
> Well, one way would be to not have too many boards, but to let people post and if there are frequent enough posts of some type that it merits it's own board then it gets made

This is the right way.

Just in the recent months since ourchan sprang up many new boards were requested, but yet, very few posters exist on the new boards.

A suggestion to put this into practice is to require a few things for the creation of new boards, not only to have an indication of how much demand exists for them, but also for the sanity of admins.

Here are some requirements for new boards:

1. At least two threads must exist on >>>/gen/ about the board topic
2. The threads must have consistent activity for at least three months
4. The threads must have more than one poster

Activity levels can be measured by their position in the catalogue. We could consider anything above the third line as active (assuming the columns are fixed). Other values like PPD could also be taken in consideration if desired.

A FAQ entry should be made on this, listing the requirements and a template for anons to submit their requests.

Board requests not meeting the requirements should be ignored, or, if the template is made in a processable format, they could be automated with an auto-reject message linking to the FAQ.

Frenschan was a site for peaceful farming advice.

>>196 (OP) 
>Because when people wanted to discuss those topics, they would make the post about that topic on /pol/ rather than on /art/, for example

you can blame 4chan's moderation policies post 2015 for this.  After Trump announced he was running for president /pol/ became a board for closeted racially bigoted newfags to post whatever they felt like posting about rather than post on the appropriate board;  /pol/ became their safespace hugbox.  they continued this practice on every image board that was created afterwards.  What they fail to grasp is that these sites were created by /pol/yards and are "/pol/" in their entirety - you're not going to be b& at any of those sites for saying "faggot nigger kike" on a non /pol/ board like you would on 4chan.  
As mods here continue to move offtopic threads to appropriate boards those boards will thrive if OP wants genuine discussion is not trying to derail /pol/