simplex.png
[Hide] (100.5KB, 1024x1024) >>1701
> That is a low quality AI shit SEO blog
And even the "low quality AI shit SEO blog" knew that Session lacks (and still lacks) Perfect Forward Secrecy, but you did not.
> You just prefer SimpleX - that's fine, don't sugarcoat it.
Yes, the types of people who can read and write both Haskell and TypeScript, who also know what a "formal proof" (this is a math thing) is in the context of programming (real programming, not mere coding), and have IT security backgrounds, do prefer SimpleX.
SimpleX does not lack basic encryption functionality like Perfect Forward Secrecy and does not rely on the Oxen network. Although if someone wanted to they could proxy messages for SimpleX (or anything else) through the Oxen network using Session. Proxying (in addition to other proxying) through the Oxen network is a neat option to have but only as an option (and fundamentally with the option to opt out).
Anyone can run their own SimpleX server and put whatever reverse-proxy in front of that server they please.
Session is a NodeJS app implemented in TypeScript. By contrast, SimpleX is written in Haskell. The SimpleX desktop frontend is written in a Java framework and runs open OpenJDK, which isn't too great, but is appropriate for the use case.
Compared to SimpleX, Session is a toy.
The one major gap SimpleX has is a lack of binary reproducable builds (as in, resulting binaries built on different systems have matching hashes) in addition to the fact that SimpleX binaries are presently built on servers controlled by those niggers at Microsoft (GitHub is owned by Microsoft).