>Trump is the worst leader alive blah blah his polling is down so I want him to lose, he did x policy back three months ago and I didn't like it so I'm going to flip the table, this is the final straw etc etc bunch of other spurious crap
to
>Okay so Trump did this policy which caters to my interests and I like that, but I still secretly want him to lose because of the sunk cost fallacy of defending my bad takes before being proven wrong blah blah blah jews israel the wailing wall etc.
It's pathetic. You either eat the cake or you don't, you can't have it both ways. The constant histrionics of many of these e-celeb wannabees who want to stay ahead of the pack and also stick with the winner are pathetic. Trump is the winner in spite of it all and building the nationalist road. Andrew Anglin and company are the losers, and constantly writing bitter grapes op eds in high pitched notes, to rationalize why the form of government they all advocated is now the problem because they stand to be personally snipped by it.
If you get any great leader with a concentration of power, there is invariably going to be a mixture of good and bad. So long as the direction of advance is basically correct and the good outweighs the problems there's no real reason to object to such a man. A few mistakes here and there are the price of doing business.