>>2387
>>2388 (checked)
>What a strawman
>you thought of them as part of European family
I think there is a miscommunication here, perhaps on my part. Let me explain my position clearly: the worship of yahweh under any form (including christianity) is foreign to Europe, both in the sense of the area and the people it comes from. One cannot "alienate" that which is foreign: "alienation" means to "make foreign", and "foreign" means "alien". If people have adopted alien ideologies, I may upset them by wanting to eject the alien, but I simply cannot alienate their alien ideology.
BUT, if you meant that I might upset some people who have a foreign ideology by advocating for the disentanglement of their foreign ideology with my people, then yes, certainly.
> funny because it turns out 1000 years was dedicated to crafting glorious and perfect art for Biblical figures
The word you're looking for is "tragic", not "funny".
>All the great work great men of Europe did in past century is practically shat on because to which they have dedicated it to
Nonsense. Yuri Gargarin is still an impressive and brave man whose actions are worthy of admiration despite whatever worldview he may or may not have believed in (officially at least). I respect the achievements of many great men whose official ideologies I wouldn't want anywhere near my family.
>Indo-European conquests stepped foot in the Middle East aswell.
Irrelevant. Jews are Semites, which belong to the Afro-Asiatic family, which is completely distinct from any European and/or Indo-European family, both linguistically, culturally, geographically and most importantly: ethnically. The fact that some jews were more or less Hellenized (ie. conquered by Greeks and therefore able to speak Greek) doesn't make them any less ethnically jewish. French-speaking Africans are no less ethnically African for it. Neither of us is English or American despite using their tongue.
>Jesus was not a Jew
>He was very likely of Greek or Pontic descent or something.
He's a midrashic character, but the character is undeniably jewish. He's explicitly from the tribe of judah, which is what defines the jewish identity. The otherwordly being for which he is the messiah is yahweh, the tribal deity of the jews. The prophecies he fulfills are from the tanakh (ie. the jewish religion). He is genitally mutilated at the exact age jews are (the 8th day), teaches the tanakh (ie. jewish religion) in synagogues (ie. jewish temples) and is rejected by his own people (jews). The main guy who tells you about him is a genitally mutilated pharisaic rabbi mohel jew from modern Turkey (picrels), and all of the apostles we know anything about are ethnically jewish (with Timotheos being only half jewish). The early christians were ethnic jews. The Greeks and Romans did not even differentiate between christian jews and non-christian jews until several centuries into the split, when christian jews went to court to argue that the legal rights that jews had been given should apply to them (ie. legally reinforcing that they were, in fact, jews) and be withdrawn from non-christian jews (ie. arguing that non-christian jews shouldn't be considered jewish anymore).
>in the modern sense
This is irrelevant and counterproductive to your point: modern jews are on average much CLOSER to being Europeans now than they were back then, since Ashkenazim and Sephardim have interbred massively with us over the past two thousand years of living among us, leaving only the Mizrahim mostly fully jewish. The average jew during the period of the Jewish Wars (ie. around the time of Saul) would have been what we now call a Mizrahim.
>advocating for Central Asians, Caucasians and Irani to stop being Muslim because thats not theirs because Arab brought it to them, so they should be Zoroastrian and Tengri again.
That would be beneficial for them and for any goy who has to interact with them, yes. It also would mean that they'd start worshipping God again, instead of the tribal deity of the jews (yahweh).
>I might be pulling it out of my ass
Well on this we agree.
>How do you mean to overwrite
Complete strawman. I've never said anything of the sort. This conversation is me arguing that you shouldn't mix the laundry, which both Adolf Hitler and the apostles agree on. So, I'll say it again: you should not pretend to serve two masters when both of those masters say that it is impossible to do so. Pick whichever one your soul favors: your people, or the tribal god of the jews.
PS. Since you're a Serb, I'm guessing that you're an orthodox christian. In case you don't know, most of the day to day practices of your religion have nothing to do with the bible, and are remains of your ancestral (ie. goyim and pagan) traditions. Check out the work of Stefan Cvetkovic for examples: https://linktr.ee/stefcvetkovic
The same goes for the "Roman" catholics, but we protestant peoples have discarded our own traditions and actually taken the bible more seriously (Americans being the purest example). That's why most of us are either atheist nihilists now, or hardcore zionist christians.