This is a thread for the discussion of the Indo-European or Indo-Germanic worldview, past, present and future. The goal is to create a curriculum of texts which can be studied and shared easily, as well as to learn from the past so as to inform our behavior in the present and future. I invite all anons to contribute their recommendations of reading materials and ideas. I will offer topics for discussion throughout the thread, but feel free to contribute your own.
>"Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future."
Literally 1984
>Defining Indo-European
Since the Indo-Europeans (aka. Western Steppe Herders) merged with a variety of peoples who are relevant to us, such as the Early European Farmers and the Western Hunter Gatherers, some of the ideas of the absorbed locals likely influenced the resulting syncretic cultures and peoples. We should expect some differences between descendant Indo-European populations with different admixtures of EEF/WHG/WSH. This does not preclude them from belonging to the same overall category. This thread is not centered on the primogenitive Indo-European worldview, although reconstructionist efforts are welcome too. For the purpose of this thread, both the ancestral and descendant populations can be referred to as broadly Indo-European.
>Anathema
Ideas which are exclusively of Afro-Asiatic origin (which includes Semites and therefore includes jews) or even just have significant Afro-Asiatic influence can never be considered Indo-European. The same could be said for any other significantly distant people, such as Dravidians or Bantus, but given our geographic circumstances, it is the Afro-Asiatic group that is of concern for us. Ancient Egypt is a good example of a culture which had influence from both Afro-Asiatics and Europeans (most likely pre-Indo-Europeans though), so they are not useful for us in this specific context. Christianity, Islam and Marxism (in practice, but obviously not in dogma) fall into similar categories, where, even if they have been carried by Europeans for generations and have therefore been suffused with European ideas, they are still fundamentally not of our making. These topics can be studied for comparison with the unpolluted Indo-European worldview only once we have a solid understanding it.
>Limitations
I am almost entirely unfamiliar with Satem (ie. Eastern) Indo-European languages and cultures, and the translations from Centum (ie. Western) to Satem languages are rather sparse. I will focus mostly on the Centum Indo-Europeans, but welcome the input from Satem-speaking Indo-European anons.
>inb4 this is globohomo
I am in no way suggesting that we all ought to adopt the exact same version of the Indo-European worldview. That would be highly unfeasible and detrimental. Understanding the things we have in common, however, and adopting that which is useful to us from our cousins (if any), is highly feasible and useful. Europeans have always done so, and this is our greatest strength as well as our greatest weakness (since our eternal enemy was able to Trojan-horse his way in with an idea purposefully crafted to do so after realizing he could not win militarily). I advocate for the continuation of this great European tradition, but with an immune system (that's you!) that is now aware of the enemy's tricks.
>inb4 this is satanism/haram/heresy/anti-semitism/idolatry/kafir!
If you wish to argue in favor of the tribal god of this or that Semitic group, take it to another thread.