/lit/ - Literature

1v1ht6akn4g21.jpg
[Hide] (27.6KB, 396x385) Reverse

Havent read that particular book, but I find any well known book of the sort; that surrounds the topic of the JQ, are always very good reads. I read "A history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind" and even though I already had a broad idea of its concept, understanding it in detail really does make your brain grow. Plus its written by Henry Ford of everyone :D

1762611346851.jpg
[Hide] (150.7KB, 1080x1760) Reverse

1762614247079.jpg
[Hide] (377.1KB, 1080x2298) Reverse

>>517 (OP) 

The International Jew
Henry Ford
3.1 MB
PDF
https://pomf2.lain.la/f/7moireaf.pdf




.

turner1.jpg
[Hide] (1.8MB, 2000x3500) Reverse

turner2.jpg
[Hide] (3.7MB, 3900x9300) Reverse

>>496 (OP) 
here is a classic

pol_books_1_-_sept_2015.jpg
[Hide] (471.1KB, 1016x1095) Reverse

>>496 (OP) 
>...without being overly long or scattered between two dozen eclectic titles

dblchan started this up monthly a decade ago up until Tarrant did his trick.  I did manage to download the entire "catalog" every month but out of the hundreds of books acquired only read less than ten

warofimages.jpg
[Hide] (828.4KB, 1290x1292) Reverse

>>556
>I didn't realize that about Serbian and other Slavic language.
Yes, under the Habsburg rule and after the uprising after 1804, serbian language somewhat prospered dare i say, and after WW1/WW2 it decided it had enough and completely abandoned the slavic elements of itself and just embraced trend-chasing blindly the next lingua franca.

>I swear, we will soon see the death of spoken communication, and instead, people will walk around with a pocket full of meme cards, and will reply by holding them up to each others faces. 
Holy shit, my sides!!

>but when reading the English literature of, say, 1750-1850, I realized i needed to learn English better.
That is the case also with serbian in some regards when i read past literature, but the point is, there is no point in trying to learn the older vocabulary because if you bring it up, contemporary peers will just cringe immensely and go back to the judeo-slop-ebonics they speak today or the belgrade-street-nigger accent and vocabulary, they should be gassed i swear to God.

>>557
Yah, its funny. I deleted all my social media around 2012. I simply did not like what it was doing to me, and doing to others. I could see people were becoming less social and more mentally scattered. So, I have, essentially, missed out on 13 years of development on how people think, communicate, and even perceive themselves. I am a normal person from 2010, put into a time machine, and transported to the modern world. 

And because of this, I communicate different than most people. And people seem to like talking with me. i think it's because I give them attention when they talk, instead on constantly checking my phone like most people do. I also tend to speak slower, and present my thoughts with more precision and nuance than they are used too. What a funny world it has become.

4cfda76712bbc5a0e16bc7ffa33747a3-800.jpg
[Hide] (92.5KB, 560x800) Reverse

DOC-SAVAGE.-October-1937.jpg
[Hide] (301.4KB, 1000x1437) Reverse

>>498 (OP) 
I have been recommending old pulp novels for a while. I think a lot of men would get a lot out of them. They are stories of active heroics. Men defeating the enemy and saving the day. 

They are also a snap-shot of our culture before its decay. That positive early 20th century culture that went on to dominate the world and conqueror the stars. 

And there is a real energy in the writing. It is hard to explain, but I always find that i am very energized and ambitious after reading them. 

I would recommend The Shadow and Doc Savage. You should be able to find them on the interwebz. Grab the first novel of each series and give it a go.

2c9e2dcd5177fd2415ba1ac6285b850e402dd769515b176a6b982ddb2424e4b8.jpg
[Hide] (30.2KB, 321x499) Reverse

>>559
anon was suggesting some Corgi pulp war books not long back. This author is a vet apparently

>>560
Man, pulp covers were such incredible art. They are just so much fun to look at. And the stories, I feel, are so good for the soul. 

There is a weird autist who has a site on the philosophy of pulp novels. Its called Pulp Fiction Renaissance. You should read a few of his main articles, they are actually very good and interesting.

I have PDFs of Encyclopedia Britannica 1878 and Chambers' Encyclopedia 1901.  I really should hit the thrift stores and try to find an actual set from way back when

>>304 (OP) 
I heard there are copy’s of encyclopedias post 1945 that do not have the holocaust as an entry . I think they started adding it late 70s

This is how I feel about Webster’s (Second) New International. It’s just a fine dictionary of the English language and it’s all sorts of encyclopedic and teaches all sorts about etymology and history and the like.
As a lawfag, I hate the descriptivist dictionaries that give you plainly false entries on the basis that some retards use the word incorrectly so now the word means two opposite things. Comprise is one, modify another, I really don’t mind that Websters 3d included “aint” though the addition of slang is far less controversial and problematic for elquence than the orangatanization of language by definition shifting

>>305
>>306
im surprised i have yet to see anyone mention a definitive old non zogged encyclopedia set yet anywhere on 4chan over the years, im sure theres an objective answer out there to, there has to be 1 autist out there who either owns a ton of sets and has compared them all, but the chances of them being here would be pretty low

>>519
Interesting, AI seems to agree that the Encyclopædia Britannica, particularly its celebrated 11th Edition (1910-1911). is the best pre internet set someone can have. Although it also says this While later editions (like the famous 15th Edition's "Macropædia," "Micropædia," and "Propædia" structure introduced in 1974) were also highly respected for their accuracy and comprehensive nature, they adopted a more modern, objective, and concise style, losing some of the literary flair of the 11th.

>>436 (OP) 
https://annas-archive.org/md5/a3a16dea34c41237768b49fbea0d41c9
>The Dark Knight Rises: The Official Movie Novelization
>Titan Books Ltd, Penguin Random House LLC (Publisher Services), London, 2012
>Greg Cox
Well I'll be. Bane indeed. And while on the subject on Bane/lit/ and looking for this I saw some other interesting books

https://annas-archive.org/md5/04b5d75245557a74575fc01932e01fa7
>The dark knight trilogy screenplays
>Presents the complete screenplays of Christopher Nolan's Batman film trilogy as well as storyboards from each movie.

>>513
Um, thanks. Totally unrelated(?) to bane, but I appreciate it and added to personal archive.

>>302 (OP) 
No because I don't give a shit who wins

This for the war between Neanderthals and Cro Magnon

>>302 (OP) 
Ideology is not sexy to you? Do you choose your opinions based on the skin colour and nose shape of the opinion-giver?

>>508
jews are cancer. cope.

What if I told you being white was a precondition but not sufficient for being based?

I think they just immerse themselves in an alternate universe and start thinking it through and writing about it. I've looked at my share of the nonfiction books claiming to tell you how to write, but art is never enjoyable as a formula. Reading other good authors, saturating yourself in various themes and ideas. Learning how to write the gist of a story without doing the beginner mistakes of writing everything down.

I think moderating a roleplaying game would be a very good way to start, since that requires a lot of creative flexibility which is what keeps stories going. An author can take a prompt, an idea, a whatever and spin it into a yearn. That's their talent I would think. 

Also be very easy on yourself starting out. It's like learning to sculpt statues. Obviously your first results will be very bad until you start finding your voice, which is learning how you want to write a story. Don't go any further than short stories to start, don't burn through all your mega ideas in the first couple of attempts to learn dialogue and action. But again, the best teacher would be just to read stories with good dialogue and pacing and consciously understanding how they present their material. Another guy was talking about Dune for instance, which is a book about internal monologues interspaced with conversations in a set of jump cuts.  That's an intesting style, although there are others. Anthology collection tend to help since they have many short stories by numerous differen

16630_full.jpg
[Hide] (115.1KB, 700x501) Reverse

If you want to write you need to read. Read a lot, read from different centuries, hardly matters what. The more the better. Once you've reached the proverbial 10,000 hours you've approaching 1st degree of literary mastery.

>>491
As a side note, how can I read faster without missing any of the nuance and beauty in what I'm reading? I do read very slow and every time I try to read faster I end up getting lost in the sauce, am I just stupid?

>>492
speed reading doesn't really work as advertised. You actually should just take the time to steep and think your way through every book you read, because it's healthier for your neurons to make connections while you absorb the mere outlines of information. I don't think that's the same as being stupid, and you'll get better with practice

1264467645830.jpg
[Hide] (195.1KB, 550x686) Reverse

>>492
I recommend EyeQ, it's a eye training program designed to strength your eye muscles and hone your focus. Though the thing that really limits most people is subvocalizing (saying the words in your head as you read) so gotta retrain the brain that words > concepts, instead of words > sounds > concepts.
https://www.eyeqadvantage.com/
https://thepiratebay.org/description.php?id=6981468
eyeQ [3.3.11].iso [142 MB] https://files.catbox.moe/x07ke3.iso
Infinite Mind - eyeQ [3.3.11] Serial Code: 69696969696

A long time ago it helped me read at 300 wpm comfortable, now, long out of (program) practice, I'm hovering around 400-450 average. If I do try though I can get it much higher (1k+ wpm). I've heard judges have 10k+ wpm reading speed.

A question to ask yourself is, can you read it faster 3 or 4 times at 1,000 words per min with 80% comprehension and absorb it better than 1 pass at 97% yet 200 wpm?