>>553
>Now, whether or not you agree with this, it does seem the direction the world is moving. Or, the other thought is
And thats not a problem. English is pretty good language (excluding ebonics and other subhuman accents). Only thing like entertainment and other day to day things shall remain in native languages, while all general knowledge of understanding the world should be through english when people mean to connect, otherwise it can also be nurtured in the native language to see how far could it go. I tried to translate the spirit of serbian language in the english, it worked partially, but guess where it got stuck... serbian language is simply primitive, there can be made a case that it loves to kill itself and voluntarilly commits suicide unlike other language who at least try to integrate latin and other loanwords well enough. Serbian is just slavic words used to connect loanwords together in a nuttshell and make sense if there even is sense, without the loanwords, especially the anglo ones for getting through modern speech, you are left with pretty primitive language, that taps into concepts but never goes deeper and then just latches onto latin due to trend chasing.
>Latin would be interesting, because it is a dad language, therefore it would maintain a linguistic solidity. Or some automated form of translation.
Latin is a great basis of all our Indo-European languages to some extent, its how we grasp higher concept, while Slavic languages are grounded and primal for the Indo-European mind.