/r/ - Religion

db238a899d1a2e93aa9f5767321389b162001feff610357a9a930564a5f74061.png
[Hide] (152.2KB, 616x761) Reverse

>>2561 (OP) 
Nigger.

5a2e054abddac22e1d30145ec4d30357e730fadae5faa0e1c11dab71bf7ac7b5.jpg
[Hide] (3.4MB, 3240x4320) Reverse

4afa5db911de006c4d1b4223a17f7ebb9a1833bd6d759d6f4ac10174b0fce815.jpg
[Hide] (251.3KB, 709x1024) Reverse

9e6b607349f97406659a74d949134271a652abb769bb7b92a9b60a9b6da0e187.jpg
[Hide] (354.1KB, 923x2490) Reverse

2a889ae2818fcfe936635ce700b2546810c0279241d09831d4fb33350e44c8ca.jpg
[Hide] (3.1MB, 2250x2250) Reverse

>>2561 (OP) 
Double nigger.

Talmud is a discussion/arguments book. All of the things written are presented as conversations/arguments between various rabbis. Basically everything in it is open to interpretation as in nothing is concrete, but get this, it is CONSIDERED nonetheless, which makes all the things written fucked up to be begin with.

>>2588
People say this, but it's exactly like the New Testament in countless ways: there's historical stuff in there, mixed in with mythology, parables, reinterpretation and debate of Torah law (or Old Testament law by analogy), commentary on fulfillments of prophecy, future prophecies, and so on. I do agree with your last sentence, as you are the only other anon I've seen point out that the mere pilpul and discussion of certain subject matter by itself is absurd / implicitly shows such wicked things were done before enough times to be a matter of debate.

>>2589
Remember when UsefulCharts made a video about Talmud, i think that was a big one back in the day. He tried to justify the book in front of the goyim and it backfired badly. No matter how you spin it, the entire premises of conversations in the book are problematic on their own, like who discusses such stuff.