When I think about concepts, ideas, or things that people say, I always ask myself: Based on what? Related to me how? As opposed to what? To whose benefit? To what end?
Historically, how many tribes and ethnic groups have existed? How many have been wiped out, replaced or exterminated by more efficient groups? The existence of every single ethnic group, race and species on this planet today is built on the blood and bones of billions if not trillions of competing organisms. Consider the number of tribes and ethnic groups in south America, Africa or Asia that have in the past few thousand years been wiped out in various regional conflicts. Do you know their names or their stories? Do you think of them before you go to sleep at night? When you consider good and evil? These people are gone. The dead have no need for morality. As such morals are subjective. Subjective to the laws of nature. Only the living can compare their morality to competitors or predecessors.
History demonstrates the unforgiving nature of competition and the necessity for the formation of regional and ethnic groups for the purpose of collective survival. Yet, the global world demands ever larger and more powerful collectives. It is no longer possible for a single ethnic group to remain in complete isolation from the outside world. Today, we have trade and manufacturing networks that transport goods and materials for processing in highly specialized hubs, along with exotic agricultural products from around the world. The existence of strongly embedded secret societies, cults, globe-spanning ethnic mafias, and military and economic blocs in Asia, the Middle East, or South America threatens the continued existence of European-founded nations. Such realities force our hand towards the formation of larger unions between various European ethnic groups. However, the formation of larger collectives requires deep consideration regarding the historical pitfalls of such formations. This includes the preservation of both the most dominant and the most minor or regional constituents within a union. The very foundation of a union must be based on respect for the identities, cultures, languages, and homogeneity of the distinct ethnic groups or regions making up such a union.
Within any collective, from the family to the empire, survival and continuity require sacrifice from the individual. This sacrifice extends from the time given, resources contributed, and assistance provided, to adherence to laws, norms, and culture, even to the extent that personal desires are curbed. There are even times where one must risk their life in war or the struggle for existence. The strength of the collective rests on the ability and willingness of its constituents. Yet, the overriding interests of the collective can overwhelm individual concerns or perceived "rights." Such logic can be extended to encompass the struggle between regions, ethnic groups, unions, and empires. The relationships of large collectives are not based on friendship, sentiment, or fantasy, but on self-interest, in the prospect of mutual advantage. Just as any individual or family will struggle within the larger world for their own personal space, resources, and conditions, so too will nations forge alliances and act based on aligning interests and the simple calculation of greater collective power in a world of eternal competition.
A nation is its people. Without the people, there is no nation. Fundamentally, a nation is a boat for millions of individuals. A boat on the seas of eternal struggle, where waves of disaster, invasion, or decline can overwhelm this fragile vessel. A boat of necessity, forged by the laws of nature and the natural limitations of individual competitive potential. It is within this boat that different regional groups and social classes or castes exist, depending on how you view the differentiation of behavioural patterns as part of the specialization found within the superorganism.
If my survival or life were not dependent on the collective, would I have any interest in its survival? Would I not watch it with the same disinterest as when one watches a wolf hunting deer, or when a lion is chasing a gazelle? Would you?
Just as we can observe the hunter-prey cycles found within nature with disinterest. So too can other nations and ethnicities observe our struggle and decline with disinterest if not with some self serving inclinations, as they await for opportunities to fall into their lap. Who in a normal state of mind would disregards his own family, home and life in favour of helping complete strangers? If your nation sacrifices itself to save another, is the representation acting in your interest? One assists within the collective based on the understanding that their life rests on the well being of their collective. So within a union between nations and ethnicities it would be ridiculous to consider a reality in which a nation would willingly sacrifice their own population or resources for the benefit of another unless the overall benefit from the union was sufficient for such a sacrifice.
As such, when a nation is no longer looking out for the continuation of its constituent castes, regional, or ethnic groups, then it stops being a nation or boat for those particular castes, regional, and ethnic groups. It becomes a hostile collective intent on the destruction of these previously constituent collectives. This can be seen in situations where a hostile ethnic group takes over a nation and colonizes it, either with its own ethnic group or with, in effect, mercenary invaders. When the colonizing force outnumbers the constituent collectives, then for the victims of such aggression, the situation becomes one of existential survival. These groups can no longer consider themselves to be part of the nation nor to be on the same boat. They must consider their own lifeboats.
As such comes the consideration of identity. Why do I call for a gradient of identities? Why do we have to consider our participation in every collective, all the way from the family, clan, region, ethnic group, and race? Just as I have previously raised the point of an abusive or degenerate family and the role of the individual in surviving, reproducing, and competing, so too does a family survive and compete within a larger world. You are the representation for yourself. All representation in collectives above you from your family to an empire are based on this representation. Thus it is of every individual’s interest to consider the actions, responsibilities and the degeneration happening within their collectives. Sure, some individuals especially normies can be driven adrift because of false foundations and greedy individuals. But there is a marker for success written into the very base of our existence. Wrong ideologies, approaches or action result in death. The dead have no need to worry about morality, right or wrong!
If the ethnic group as a superorganism is not recognized, if the sum of all the individuals who make it up is seen as of no consequence nor value, one which is destroyed on the whims of delusional ideologies or religions, then at this point, what does that make of the individuals who make up this collective? How do we judge the worth or value of a single individual if not by their awareness, creativity, personality, and their ability to interact with the world? We as a society have no respect for pigs, cows, or chickens because they lack awareness, intelligence, and an ability to interact with the world.
Yet, has a single individual ever dared to say that their work or worth is greater than that of France, Germany, England, or Italy? The heritage, languages, cultures, and histories of these nations are beyond that of any individual. It is these collectives that are being trashed, the superstructure that sustains us and gives our lives meaning. If you are a single cell within the body of a single being, does the death of this being not concern you? Does its degradation not affect you? A single man might wield more power than a single nation like Germany or England but they are only directing the force of a larger collective.
Our identities should start from the ground up. From the individual to their family, their clan, their city, their region, their caste/class, their ethnic group and lastly the empire that they are part of. As Bowden once said: “Thinking is the important thing. Being white isn’t enough. Being English isn’t enough. Being British isn’t enough. Know what you are! In this book to read about your own culture is a revolutionary act. People are taught to rebel at school and hate our high culture, hate our folk culture – it’s all boring.”
Every successful European ethnic group in the past had this understanding until the zog took over. In Rome and in Germanic nations it had been illegal for nobles and plebs to class mix. The Romans, Greeks, Chinese and Japanese had family and city gods to represent each of these collectives. The Celtic and Germanic tribes had gods to represent their tribes or ethnic groups.
Identity and therefore collectives acting in their own self interest come in a hierarchy and you need to have an awareness of each one. A collective without an awareness of itself will be taken advantage of and ruined. There is no reality or future where we can strip off all the other identities and call each other white without disastrous consequences. The idea of massive collectives and a ((( human race ))) just screams of zog influenced leftist ideology and thinking(ignorance). Wishful thinking of global and eternal peace is the source of all that is wrong in this world. Competition is the basis of all life, natural selection, evolution, morals, everything that you consider as just or good. Morality at its basis is a way to judge individuals or collectives who behave in a way to disadvantage (you)r collective as ‘bad’/‘evil’. The punishment and destruction of things that are bad/evil is good and just. The behaviour that (you) like to see in others is shaped by competition. The culling of the bad/evil and the growth of the good/efficient/intelligent. A world with no competition based on collectives is a world of degeneration back to the lowest denominator. A world in which the untouchables from india and africa outbreed the meek and atomised Europeans. But even this is a form of competition. A competition for space, resources and breeding rights.
War is constant. Every second of every hour of every day for all eternity is filled with conflict. If you aren’t fighting a physical war you will fight an economic war. If you don’t fight for resources you will fight for information, for ideas, for organisations and ideologies. If you don’t kill soldiers and bomb cities you will prevent the birth of children and the formation of new families through economic, legal and spiritual means. We will never experience a moment of peace. The perception of peace is false as the last 80 years have shown. Cultural, economic, legal and spiritual warfare have been waged against us without our own awareness. Indoctrination of our kin, the takeover of our institutions, governments, financial systems, education, the continuous prevention of ethno-centric religion have been ongoing without pause. There is a corruption of the youth, atomisation of the individual, destruction of the family, destruction of the clans, cults for the so called elite who serve as puppets for their true masters and false heroes to mislead the honest.
War, conflict and competition starts in the mind. It is based on ideas, knowledge, needs and desires. Ideas and knowledge can be manipulated through censorship, indoctrination, false information and propaganda. Through the manipulation of ideas and knowledge it is possible to alter the percieved desires of the people. But never the needs.
Can and should’ won’t replace the reality of economic, resource, space, cultural, spiritual or talent based competition between groups.
Just as America had imposed its culture on all Europeans, as the jews had imposed their religion on Europe and as the Chinese compete economically with Europe. The forms of competition and the various grouping at all levels are numerous. From the individual to the empire. If you take away competition through war you will introduce competition through a dozen other avenues. Avenues that can claim more lives and cause more destruction than war ever could.
We can consider cooperation and collectives based on shared needs but we can never replace the identities and collectives that will make up any future European empire. There will always be a person or collective that will seek more. Greed is inherent in the nature of life. Weakness will always be taken advantage of. Unconscious and unaware groups without a representation acting in their best interests will end up destroyed. This is a serious problem when considering the internal state of a nation.
Capitalistic competition between companies is a natural aspect of society. It becomes a problem only when these companies overcome the natural hierarchy within the ethnic collective by becoming international (thus hiring foreign labour, utilizing the superstructure of the nation along with its intellectuals while taking away the jobs that the lower and middle classes could have fulfilled), forming monopolies (thus no longer pushing for efficiency or competitive advantage while preventing the growth of competitors), or when they directly start to influence the governance of the nation for their own personal benefit, becoming parasitic leaches in the process. If there is ever a time in which businessmen have more money or power than the leaders of a nation then it is the businessmen who control the nation. Efficient extractors of labour.
I once spoke to a man who proudly stated that "first world" nations like America or Britain have no corruption, unlike Eastern Europe. Yet, when I questioned the sums Tony Blair received for his speeches, that Hunter Biden received for his "art," I was met with talks of the free market and the value of work put in by famous individuals. It's very convenient for money to move around so freely at such levels, jobs done and payments received. This doesn't even cover the manipulation of stock prices and purchases that resulted in substantial amounts of money for many politicians. That too can be attributed to the free market and individual skill, placing your bets at the right time with the right companies. The individuals or their names are irrelevant. They are but masks and puppets used by the international system for the dance that they call the two-party system. The most interesting aspect of this system is the way it calls for equality. Ah, but not equality between the new tyrants and the poor. Equality between everyone below the ruling class. To them, the opinions of cattle are irrelevant, as all have the same value. You don't stop to listen to the cows in the slaughterhouse, do you? No need to differentiate between them. Perhaps freedom within this system symbolizes free range?
It is said that there can be no consent between an adult and a child due to status, wealth, strength, developmental, and intellectual differences. What about the consent between the unthinking masses and the cults who rule them? Are the abuses, degeneracy, and genocides not fuelled by the ineptitude of the masses themselves, the enablers of the abuse, the poorly secured grain silo attracting mice? If the normies are the grain, are the nobles and priests taking care of the silo itself? The weakness of one is supplemented by the strength of the other. The problem with such an arrangement is that it requires selective pressure for its maintenance, when the times are good no one questions the integrity of the silo. Only when pests get in does the full picture get examined. It should also be noted that if the mice are inside already eating your grain then it won’t matter how much more efficiently you can grow or produce grain. You must remove the mice.
The crux of the issue today is that with modern consolidated nation states and especially after the dissolution of native European nobility and the Industrial Revolution. We have had a massive increase in normies as opposed to leadership caste individuals. All of our grain has ended up within one silo infested with rats. The original natural order or balance has tilted in the direction of the masses. Potentially dooming us all. As we no longer have a point of retreat. No stronghold. No bastion. All of our grain is completely infested.
When we consider a multi-ethnic empire, it could be said that the leadership of the empire will not consider every single ethnic group or its survival as much as it could on its own. In such a situation, an ethnic group that does not have an ethnic consciousness, does not see itself as a collective, or ceases to compete will be overwhelmed by more aware, more efficient, and more competitive ethnic groups. Even within the dichotomy of the white versus black identity that is often presented by the government, with America as the empire and the various European nations as its vassals, does America care about the continuation of the small Estonian or Lithuanian ethnic groups? Should these collectives shed their language, traditions, homogeneity, and identity, would an imperialist Russia, Sweden, or Poland care for their survival? If the individuals who make up this collective are not willing to consider survival by themselves?
Even within an ethnically homogenous country, could it not be said that certain regions are industrially or economically undeveloped? Could it not be said that their youth flood to the capital? Without some regional identity, collective awareness, and responsibility, these smaller regions become destitute. The eternal struggle continues at all levels of life, from the bacteria, to the critters and plants in the forest, to the individual, to the family, to the region, the ethnic group, and finally the race itself.