/r/ - Religion

Promised by God


New Reply[×]
Name
Sage
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


juliuscaesar.png
[Hide] (443.4KB, 604x762) Reverse
Juilus Caesar's real identity was was Ptolemy XIV, Pharaoh of Egypt aka Ptolemy X Alexander II, Cleopatra's brother-husband. He also used the regional aliases of Asander, King of Bosphorus and Pharnaces II who was the brother of Cleopatra's father Ptolemy XII Auletes/Ptolemy X Alexander I, king of Egypt, who was also Mithridates VI Eupator. Cleopatra took on the Bosphoran identity of Dynamis, queen of Bosphorus.

In the name Asander (his Bosphoran alias), "Asa" means "lord" in Thracian and Celtic, and "andros" means "man" or "son of man" in Greek. Jesus is referred to as "the son of man" 81 times in the four canonical gospels. Asandro can also be interpreted as "son of the lord" or "son of Asa, the lord". The Thracian version of Zeus was Asa/Asaeus, the Celtic was Esus/Hesus. The Etruscan word “Aesar” (also spelled "Aeser" or "Aisar"), where Asa could also derive from, means "god" or "divine". The Greek language often added the prefix "K" to words borrowed from other languages, so Aesar ("god") -> Greek Kaesar -> Latin Caesar. So, Asandros can translate to either "son of god", or "son of Lord Aesar

Mark Antony's real identity was either Ptolemy of Cyprus, a brother of Ptolemy XII Auletes (Cleopatra’s father) aka Mithridates Chrestus aka king Herod or else Cleopatra's father Ptolemy XII Auletes/Ptolemy X Alexander I, king of Egypt (she was also married to two of her brothers. This is how incestuous this family was).

Rome in Italy was built in the Middle Ages, at the same time as the rest of Europe. The Egyptian Ptolemaic empire didn't die at the founding of Rome, Ptolemaic Kings just moved to the Bosphorus and then took on regional aliases. They eventually moved to Italy.
Replies: >>1859
All sources are listed here: 

https://hereticalbooks.com/the-origins-of-christianity/
e8d58faede75e206620b3ee974ff12a97f6b91a8084ca94f3b53aca5f388623e.jpeg
[Hide] (140KB, 1250x423) Reverse
>>1856 (OP) 
I more willing to believe Jews used the myth of Jesus to subvert the Roman Empire then Jesus is a creation of Rome.
Replies: >>1860
>>1859
That's also blatant nonsense. Even the kikeiest of the early christian leaders rejected the judasizers. Who do you think pointed Nero at Christians? His Jewish wife.
Replies: >>1861
>>1860
Jesus may have been noble as a freedom fighter and rebel against one of the most truly diabolical and subanimal species to ever exist in the history of the universe, but it is no secret that the common roots that Christianity shares with judaism and islam has allowed it to be used as a tool for open borders, multi-culturalism, and feminism. Christianity inevitably seems to turn into Judeo-Christianity, unless there is a strong indigenous European religious and cultural identity already present in a host nation.
>But native European religions were subverted by Christianity, what does that say about native European religions?
Christianity took over because few had access to the primary source material of the Bible. Few Christians today have even read the Bible and instead follow what their pastor or preacher says what is in the Bible; you think early illiterate adopters had access to it? They believed what their tribal leaders and priests said, especially when it was ILLEGAL to even translate the Bible or interpret it for yourself, unless you were part of a select priesthood. Syncreticism was employed by priests, by blending belief systems already held by native Europeans with the new religion of Christianity by means deception (intentional or not), to make it palatable. If you doubt any of this, look at the Christianity in South America, South Korea, and Africa: they are bizarre amalgamations of Christianity mixed with native beliefs, to the point that they are simply wearing the skincloth of a cross and Bible when you actually examine what they believe and practice. If you need yet another example, sheep don't exist in many cultures, and a native animal had to be used instead as an example by missionaries instead for this supposedly universal religion. That should be a major warning sign that syncreticism is very much vital to the spread of Christianity.

Indigenous European religions at the very least did not have ambiguous wording which allowed the idea of foreigners ever been seen as equal or welcome in their own lands. Christianity is foreign on the whole, regardless of its Greco-Roman pagan influences in the NT or the Mesopotamian and Egyptian influences in the OT.
Replies: >>1862
20bc03693cdfd55f64028d409d75119429de410afae210828ab85bbaa88a09c7.png
[Hide] (362.7KB, 636x356) Reverse
ce368df2b6335f9e71045b54961ff08c103b1eb5a01966833a0dcda97be69843.jpg
[Hide] (801.9KB, 1916x1128) Reverse
>>1861
Meant to say:
>Indigenous European religions at the very least did not have ambiguous wording which allowed the idea of foreigners ever being seen as equal or welcome in their own lands.
By the way, I denounce the Talmud, affirm that Israel is a genocidal apartheid rogue welfare pedophile-harboring state with an illegal nuclear arms program known as the Samson Option, killed their own people intentionally on October 7th by means of the Hannibal Directive, and state that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion's contents are an accurate representation of the behavior of jews everywhere.
[New Reply]
5 replies | 4 files | 5 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3