>>887
>Modern Jews aren't native to Israel. Jesus would have looked like a Samaritan: swarthy, short, a large hooked nose, and small forebrain from archaid hominid admixture, just like the apostle Paul.
I'm the one who educated you on what Samaritans were on 4chan or the one who taught those who taught you. Cutheans were already a foreign people to the people of Judea in terms of blood and culture from the time the texts of the New Testament were in oral form. This is also true from academic, extra-biblical, and Talmudic texts. You don't need to post pictures and long links; I posted them myself multiple times over for years.
You got your idea from me pointing out that Jesus was confused as both a Pharisee (proto-Jew or 'real' Jew if you will) and a Samaritan (absolutely not a Jew or proto-Jew) in two different verses, both of which were never answered or resolved.
Palestinian Christians are the closest descendants genetically from the people discussed at biblical times of about 2000 years ago. Samaritans are a little bit behind them in genetics, but are the closest descendants of the Israelites and Hebrews in terms of spiritual and religious tradition despite not being Jews by any definition.
From what I can discern, the Hebrew and Israelite blood is either long-lost or has been muddled. The Jewish (or 'original' Jewish) blood is certainly long lost and has been muddled. The Samaritans and Palestinian Christians themselves are doubtless at least a bit muddled by now, despite Palestinian Christians having lighter features in a number of cases.
In other words, the question is unresolved. That's why this matter keeps being brought up. It doesn't help that the religions that survive longest often have contradictory or paradoxical verses or mythos, precisely so they can survive a variety of arguments, interpretations, political movements, and changes in tide over hundreds or thousands of years.