/r/ - Religion

Promised by God


New Reply[×]
Name
Sage
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


3fe83048696967bdfd0f8d2754b073ae472da81578d89e4d5c76725cb5f9fb80.jpg
[Hide] (37.8KB, 300x416) Reverse
There is a single verse in the Christian Bible that disproves Zionism entirely. It comes from 1 Peter, but to explain, I have to set up some context.

In 1 Peter chapter 1, we learn that this is a circular letter written to churches in five cities; Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia. These were all churches in what was then Asia Minor, modern-day Turkey. The city of particular interest for this argument is Galatia.

Just a few books back in the Bible, we have another letter to the Galatians, this one written by Paul. And it's obvious that this letter is written to a primarily Gentile church, as evidenced by verses such as:

Gal 1:14-17, 2:2-3, 3:7-9, 3:28-29, 4:8-9, 5:2, 5:11-12

So where 1 Peter is concerned, I see no reason to believe that it was not written to Gentile Christians as well, or at least to congregations that included Gentiles, even if there were also Jews in those churches.

And to these presumably Gentile Christians, Peter says in chapter 2 verses 9 and 10:

"But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy."

If Gentile believers are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, what else can they be but spiritual Israelites?

Can anyone see any holes in this argument? I'm planning to present this to Zionist family members in the future if it comes up (and I have a lot of Zionist family members.) I could see Galatians 2:8 being an issue:

"for he who worked through Peter for his apostolic ministry to the circumcised worked also through me for mine to the Gentiles"

So I guess you could say the Bible itself testifies that Peter was an apostle strictly to Jews. But I would counter that Peter was the apostle to whom was given the dream of the animals on the sheet, which God showed him right before sending him to evangelize the Roman centurion Cornelius in Acts 10. So while Peter may have focused his ministry primarily on Jewish converts, he was by no means only preaching to non-Gentiles.

Another problem might be Matthew Henry's commentary, which I referenced as I was doing some research on this verse. Henry states that the epistle was written to Jews. But I've read other sources -- including my own study Bible -- that say the Christians he wrote to were probably a mix of Jews and Gentiles. If there is a single Gentile included among the addressees of this letter -- a single Gentile among any of these congregations to whom Peter says "you are a holy race" -- it disproves Zionism entirely.

And even Matthew Henry, when he gets to that verse, says that this relates to the church; that the whole church is a holy race.

I would also point out that the words, "Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people," denotes Gentiles. Peter here echoes the words of the prophet Hosea: "And I will have mercy on No Mercy, and I will say to Not My People, 'You are my people'; and he shall say, 'You are my God.'" (Hosea 2:23).
Replies: >>2624
1742321070102092.jpg
[Hide] (503.2KB, 1584x1584) Reverse
Jesus was a brown leftist jew who advocated ascetic castration.
>>2582 (OP) 
>There is a single verse in the Christian Bible that disproves Zionism entirely.
Sadly irrelevant. Most Christians have not read it nor will ever read it, and the judeo-christians / noahide slaves that do read it or have read the book in full cannot be talked out of it at this point. You have an extreme minority of volkish Christians that have, but it is preaching to choir already for them.
Replies: >>2626
>>2624
I'm hoping I can start to talk some sense into them. I was personally raised Zionist and did not turn against it until I was almost 30. There just came a point where I knew something wasn't right and I had to investigate it. Tbf, I've noticed of myself that I've always been that way. I can't stand narratives and propaganda for very long, I have to at least try to get to the truth of a matter. I've unfortunately noticed that not many others feel the same. Sorry if that sounds arrogant, but I think it's true. At the end of the day, I'm remembering my own experience, coming across verses like this and just have that nagging feeling at the back of my mind that something was wrong. I'm hoping that having verses like this framed in their proper Scriptural and historical context will place that same nagging at the back of other Christians' minds, and they will also start to investigate. Who knows. Maybe it's a pipe dream. The older generations are dome for sure by now, they're too entrenched in it.
You are going the route of destroying a foundation by gnawing at the sides. I would suggest targeting the keystone so that the entire essence collapses—by example, showing that the holohoax is demonstrably false since there's plenty of archived newspapers and texts (which anyone can buy from the original publishers no less, such as The New York Times) referring to the six million figure three decades before any camp was even possible to exist, with some authentic jewish texts existing mentioning millions or billions in reference to Hadrian when Hitler was a child or not even born. By removing this keystone, all of the contemporary jewish-Western foundation myth disappears.

Following from this, jewish influence through the noahide slave religion known as judeo-christianity is removed through the keystone of pointing out that Jesus's mother was undeniably jewish. Any manner of rhetoric or argument can be made about the patrilineal lineage (God is the father; David's bloodline was not jewish; supernatural virgin birth, or even talmudic jewry stating he's half European Roman from the Panthera accusation, etc.), yet no one can refute Mary's lineage herself. This then makes the entire thing unmistakeably jewish by even modern standards and definition of jewry, even if Jesus indeed is the antithesis of the sadducee and pharisiasm cult (which all good men and women despise) within that foreign tribe and ethno-culture.

These methods do not require advanced education or reading, which is why they are potent. There's many other alternatives, similar to the route you are currently taking, but they all assume a self-educated and curious person with spare time. It is enough to take out these keystones for individuals that have vaguely hated all or most things jewish (marxism / bolshevik ideals / communism, slave religion mindset, usury and non-bankrupcy-viable loans being financial slavery, LGB and transsexualism cultification, kabbalah, freemasonry infiltration, woke and SJW, actual Satanism, fear of pregnancy / contraceptives / abortion (for Europeans), feminism, pedo hollywood, Blackrock and Vanguard, Palantir / surveillance states, pyramid-schemed and credentialized academia always running from the empirical method, and so on), which are demonstrably jewish in origin with plenty of concrete evidence, without them having to connect the dots or been shown the lines. They will find this out for themselves, in time, as long as the keystones are removed. This is what I mean by not gnawing at the foundations (connecting the dots of jewry) but instead going for the essence itself in the minds we are trying to persuade.

tldr; Remove the keystones of jewry for individuals that already show they mostly hate the essence of jewry, without exactly knowing why or how due to the postmodern fog they are in. No need to teach an individual the entire infrastructure of jewry from the ground up before tearing it down by using niche text-work philosophical arguments (no matter how true or accurate).
Replies: >>2628
>>2627
> holohoax
I know I could look this up myself, but I've been trying for a while now with only a little luck on the stuff you've mentioned (last goldmine I found was the Leuchter report). Would you mind posting your sources? This stuff is difficult to turn up.

> Jesus's mother was undeniably jewish
I'm gonna have to break with you a little bit on the religious stuff. I don't believe in Judeo-Christianity. There's Judaism and there's Christianity. The conflation of the two is a Zionist tactic, and as a Christian, I do not want to be conflated with Judaism. That being said, the entire Christian religion comes from Jewish people, including David and his lineage. It's a little anachronistic to say it that way tho; the Jews were so called cuz they came out of the Kingdom of Judah when Babylon conquered them. They referred to themselves as Israel until they returned from the exile. "Israelite," "Judahite," and "Jew" refer to the same ethnic group, just at different points in history. Judaism is it's own religion, distinct from the Yahwism of the early Israelites and Judahites, and Jesus very much opposed it despite His Jewish ancestry. Conflating ethnic Judaism, religious Judaism, and the state and government of Israel is another Zionist tactic they deploy so that if you criticize the country or the religion, they can call you racist and antisimetic. I think it's better to maintain the distinctions and criticize what needs to be criticized with accuracy. Christianity is not racist by any means, but it is anti-Jewish in the religious sense
8c000c8daec069e9b7cbbd964cbffd22eb5d52846bf0740c2c274567f963879b.webm
[Hide] (2.9MB, 480x360, 01:59)
c68d00ef71287c6ed9c156663bb6c2ff8416a3bfa8e590da777af5440edd4672.png
[Hide] (379.2KB, 908x1398) Reverse
29364570715bfe7f988ff395671a69573c74c8a148cc96731257dfd89a3afc48.png
[Hide] (117.5KB, 560x671) Reverse
>>2628
>I know I could look this up myself, but I've been trying for a while now with only a little luck on the stuff you've mentioned (last goldmine I found was the Leuchter report). Would you mind posting your sources? This stuff is difficult to turn up.
Certainly. My stuff is scattered a bit, but these should suffice for now. Within that video (of all authentic collected newspapers), you will find headlines from various publishers-- some surviving to this very day. I'll will link two, with the date of publication present along with the link to buy an archived copy yourself. I will follow this with one of many publications mentioning the 'six million' figure long before Hitler ever took power, with a direct link to one of many university libraries that published scans of such texts online if you wish from sources different from the New York Times.
>I'm gonna have to break with you a little bit on the religious stuff. I don't believe in Judeo-Christianity. There's Judaism and there's Christianity. The conflation of the two is a Zionist tactic, and as a Christian, I do not want to be conflated with Judaism. That being said, the entire Christian religion comes from Jewish people, including David and his lineage. 
I am aware of the difference. I've posted on the differences myself many times; I will provide two such long posts of my own as proof below:

___
Pharisees are the original Jews, which were a heretical subfaction of the ancient Israelites and Hebrews. They are the creators of Pharisiasm, which later evolved into Talmudism, until being refined by their foreign converts into what is now called Judaism. During time in captivity in Babylon, they adopted foreign practices including child sacrifice, worship of Saturn and Ba'al, and other customs much like the Phoenicians and their cousins the Carthaginians. They brought these back to the lands where the Israelites and Hebrews dwelt. Either during captivity or afterwards, they steadily became intermingled with foreign blood in addition to their spiritual change in religion and culture.

Pharisees, Sadducees, and a few other related groups (the original Jews) are called the enemies of the entire human race [1], the children of hell [2], a brood of vipers [3], and the children of Satan [4]. Additionally, they are the direct killers of Jesus Christ.

The Khazarian-Turkish Jews, more commonly referred to as 'the Jews' themselves nowadays, especially of the Ashkenazi strain, are their foreign converts and disciples. They are called the twice children of hell that the original Jews are [2] and are the Synagogue of Satan [5, 6].

Essentially, all original Jews were wiped out or sold into slavery after the failed three Jewish Rebellions when Rome genocided them for their crimes. Their ancestral records, including the priesthood, were completely destroyed. The daughters of the priesthood were raped and carried into sexual slavery. The Temple of Herod (the 2nd Temple) was additionally destroyed. Countless were slain or committed suicide. Rape and sexual slavery was so commonplace and systematic by the Romans to the point that they were race-mixed into oblivion for all intents and purposes.  This is the origin of the switch from between patrilineal to matrilineal descendancy to determine if you are a Jew in contrast to the Israelites or Hebrews, along with their survival strategy of pawning off Jewish females to any invader or host nation for many centuries (one always know the identity of the mother, even if the womb was fertilized by the countless many foreigner). A tiny surviving remnant scattered to the winds and seem to have interbred with Slavic-Turkish women (directly against the creeds of their own ethnoreligion, de facto making them non-Jews) in sections of ancient Ukraine, Poland, and Russia which was then called Khazaria.

A very tiny remnant of the ancient Hebrews and Israelites remain, which appears to be Palestinian Christians and Cutheans (better known as Samaritans). Palestinian Christians are either at the same level genetically as the Cutheans or slightly closer to the original bloodlines, while the Samaritans are the closest surviving descendants of the original Israelite and Hebrew religious and spiritual tradition. But even these are of an imperfect heritage, being the descendants of unions between Israelite-Hebrew fathers and Assyrian mothers from days before Christ.

[1] 1 Thessalonians 2:15 - "...who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us. They please not God and are contrary to all men..."

[2] Matthew 23:15 - "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."

[3] Matthew 12:34 - "Oh generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh."

[4] John 8:44 - "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

[5] Revelation 2:9 - "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

[6] Revelation 3:9 - "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie — behold, I will make them to come and worship at thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."
__

"...It's reasonably accurate. Its foundation of saying Christianity is derived from Judaism simply is incorrect, however. Judaism follows Talmudism strictly. Hebrewism (some use Hebraism) is accurate for what both are derived from i.e. the religion, culture, and possibly genetic substrate of the Israelites and Hebrews of old.

A very easy example to demonstrate this is the Samaritans (Cutheans) among other ethno-religious groups during the events of the Torah, the New Testament, and to our current day which follow the Torah and rejected Talmudism before and after it was written down. They are distinctly not Jews (by every source imaginable, including Jews, academics, Samaritans themselves, the Bible, and outsiders), despite their strict Hebraic lineage.


In North America and the vassal states of the United States, what is mostly followed is Noahidism (what you are referring to as Judeo-Christianity). We can't really call this Christianity, and the original graph I replied about was clearly talking about Christianity for most of its existence before the advent of this apostate strain of Talmudism called Scofieldism / Dispensationalism / Christian Fundamentalism / Judeo-Christianity took root in North America. This is still the current form of Christianity outside of North America or said vassal states. It is a slave religion (devised by masters to enslave a population and maintain a serf caste), in both a Nietzchean and literal sense.

If we are referring to this strain, I fully concede it is derived from the Talmud as part of a Noahide system.

Noahidism has been around as long as the Jews, as they have a well-established background in nearly every slave trade and market imaginable since Roman times. Although I freely admit my bias as I detest them, these are easily confirmed by encyclopedias and similar historical material generated by Jews, particularly for a Jewish audience. Noahidism follows from literal slaves and loyalist shabbos goy servants.

If you mean, when did Protestant and North American Christianity specifically get subsumed under Noahidism? This is much easier to give you a more precise answer using picrel, which is the history of Dispensationalism (the idea that Israel is a distinct [and non-Christian] state, that the church meaning the actual collective Christians themselves are not the sole meaning of Israel as new heirs, and that Jews are to be intentionally conflated with Judeans, Israelites, Hebrews, Judah, etc). More precisely, under Scofield's popularization of Dispensationalism is when these things took root and gained popularity in 1910-1930.

A final qualitative measure of when Noahidism took over in the United States and North America is with Jewish immigration (despite Jewish quotas) after the Civil War in the late 19th century, along with the increasing popularization of circumcision which is how Jews mark their slaves. This was further solidified with the massive influx of Jews post-WW2 and the evolution of Scofield's Dispensationalism and Premillennialism forming into apocalyptic Christian Fundamentalism (which I think anyone would call Judeo-Christianity).

To further clarify, Christianity in all its prior history did not normally ever view Jews as anything but outsiders and a distrusted minority group (rightfully so). There is good reason they were placed in ghettos, if not outright exiled after their worst were killed in criminal tribunal. You will find some pockets in history of leaders that treated them well, but this was not the norm by any means.

If you are wondering how on Earth this change ever took place (Christianity here being subsumed under Talmudic Noahide law), I think it's important to realize that North America was fertile soil for new ideas which includes new religions and batshit insane behavior. People like to think of this as always a positive, but it's the same reason as to why Scientology and Mormons took root. Bad seeds land in fertile soil the same as good ones."
>>2628
Returning back to the original question about Christianity vs Judeo-Christianity, I think you will find in your own words exactly what I was getting at:
>That being said, the entire Christian religion comes from Jewish people, including David and his lineage.
>It's a little anachronistic to say it that way tho; the Jews were so called cuz they came out of the Kingdom of Judah when Babylon conquered them.
>Judaism is it's own religion, distinct from the Yahwism of the early Israelites and Judahites, and Jesus very much opposed it despite His Jewish ancestry.
It was with good reason I only focused on Mary. I've tried examining it from every which way, but nevertheless arrived at the fact that it is a religion about a man (with a jewish mother) being idolized, with about 60% of the New Testament being written by the most jewest of jews (Paul / Saul). And again, by modern standards even, what do we call an individual with a full-blooded jewish mother? She is jewish, even if not strictly a pharisee or sadducee. Anyways, none of this is intended to insult you or tear you down. In truth, I didn't see this connection either until I studied foreign religions-- namely, I looked at the hindus who idolize Gods with pale-skin, blonde hair, and oftentimes blue eyes. They worship cows which the Indo-Europeans / Aryans happily raised and ate, assuredly as a way of controlling the lower caste Dravidians. Same thing likely with making rats divine, since this would encourage disease in the Dravidian castes as a form of population control. It was only then that it clicked in terms of a 'slave' religion vs a 'master religion', i.e., that the Dravidians detest ethnic Europeans right now, despite grudgingly worshipping their ancient cousins to this very day / following all the religious protocols which these Indo-Europeans set down thousands of years ago despite all evidence in front of them. The Indo-Europeans utterly despised the Dravidians, setting up a religion to control them and dominate them, yet the Dravidians still follow it to this day as a slave is programmed to do. This is no different, I came to realize, as European men and women following a religion (both Christianity and Judeo-Christianity) with its origin and genesis being the very people they despise and hopefully recognize as core spiritual-racial enemies, who in turn very much hated them and sought dominance over them.

All of this is no insult to Christian Identitarians. I respect them and their work when they are sincere, but it's important here to realize the root of both Christianity and its infinitely more sinister offspring Judeo-Christianity is wholly jewish, which later explains its influence on the evolution of the idea of universal equality, democracy, and the preposterous situation we now find ourselves in with trying to say a somalian nigger or jeet or spic is even the same species as a European, and must be treated as a human being with all equal rights, etc., in our very own lands despite every piece of evidence contrary to this.

I've shown you my very own meaning here with keystones and attacking them to take down enemy infrastructure, along with freely showing you my own biases, because I firmly believe it is so and have no fear of the truth.
0fbe3393c85bff24db61107288f0c659c6684c4b571935a2f7d98fa4c60363e8.jpg
[Hide] (2.8MB, 5000x5000) Reverse
>>2628
>holohoax
>I know I could look this up myself, but I've been trying for a while now with only a little luck on the stuff you've mentioned (last goldmine I found was the Leuchter report). Would you mind posting your sources? This stuff is difficult to turn up.
Here's one of the best compilations you'll find as well. Many are in that video, as well as being findable on your own with even a little bit of detective work. Again, break the spine of jewry (the holocaust myth) and a lot of the foundation of this nightmarish postmodern world falls apart.
812e118436aeebeb4d0dbf1738cc13c272b69a896fcd34fd575b5d47b6b5c36d.jpg
[Hide] (11.9MB, 4000x10000) Reverse
7dcfcfc1d05d0153aca056e5b4855f6d7ee21ca49ff3d8c6f5a90a0daabd33fc.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1475x717) Reverse
31040ae1baac93c8a25b55d14fda5c34d2fb234c10260811f1e15b97fae344ff.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1299x879) Reverse
>>2628
Here's some more compilations and resources I finally dug up. Knew I had them somewhere. The Encyclopedia Britannica (10th Edition), on Pg. 482 is a book you can find online and offline in many university libraries. It's the one I talked about earlier, because I found this very entry and marked it myself.
[New Reply]
9 replies | 9 files | 7 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3