/meta/ - Suggestions

I don't understand. Mods now want to defend pedoshit?

>>484 (OP) 
Is it one anon spamming that nig fag shit or is the board being raided? I get one troll thread move it to hell LOL. But this fucker seems to have an ax to grind assuming its one anon.

>>498
((( They ))) tried posting about furry shit to see if it would get deleted so they could cry about it and it did, so they regrouped and decided to try it with Loli shit.
What you see are the results.

>>499
I didn't see any of that all I saw just recently was black dudes fufcking black dudes all over the catalog . I flagged mods looks like someone deleted the pics and banned the spammer finally. Don't know if its the same anon as furry Loli but they definitely had an ax to grind. They where whining about cencorship while spamming faggot blanked. I think everyone can agree we don't want to see that shit or shed a tear over some anon not being able to spam blackened faggotry.

>>500
The ((( nigger dick spam farm ))) has finally found us.
It's not really that deep.

>>501
I thought the mods cleaned it up but round two seems to have hit. Well I guess I will be gone for awhile until this situation is taken care of if its taken care of and is not a new constant.

1711332405471074.gif
[Hide] (481.2KB, 500x281)

>>484 (OP) 

I wasn't being malicious, It was a picture of faggots kissing a kid at pride parade. Taken in public in NYC. The next was a picture of Chuck Schumer kissing a little Haitian girl in the Caribbean probably in a private resort but I stand by my work either way. I was called Pedo by the mod, and my pro tip was a Joke to the aforementioned poster. Faggot mods need to back the fuck off. 

Newfag channers wouldn't of survived 15-20 years ago as their computer would of been remote accessed and turned off for them contagiously faggy.

Its OK though the mods are newfags themselves and the duplicate images are on three other threads still.

1709837548204375.gif
[Hide] (293.8KB, 220x123)

1731883464165177.gif
[Hide] (2.7MB, 498x235)

1729754282987688.gif
[Hide] (174.3KB, 720x540)

1728691510099001.jpg
[Hide] (298.6KB, 1563x1576)

1728763699712671.webm
[Hide] (864.1KB, 1268x714, 00:14)

>>499
>>498

No most of my shit posting is political and I only have black "micro penis" pictures.

A 1/4 of the content on ourchan is from my drive. Bes put some respek on my name.

If WE can't honor freedom of information. I kindly request you remove your social experiment from our soil.

>>504
Unless you're currently spamming the board, I haven't b& you

1712282932410411.png
[Hide] (711.1KB, 779x767)

1712282929516798.gif
[Hide] (1.7MB, 403x280)

1712288414279966.jpg
[Hide] (205.6KB, 683x1024)

1730698552775279.png
[Hide] (756KB, 676x680)

1734403084015100.jpg
[Hide] (249.6KB, 1528x1418)

>>505
My post was the original that got banned yesterday at the top of this thread. 

Then someone started spamming nigger shit today in protest of mods removing content. Two different Anons.

Imma keep posting shit the mods and California based servers would consider "pedo/ MAP shit". Because I want everyone mad until, ya know, in minecraft.

+1 POSTED IT AGAIN AWARD

1738170738741706.jpg
[Hide] (106.7KB, 1024x1024)

>>506
Carry on then

>>506

Ok I guess you are going to have to preface stuff with an explanation that its pedogate related as in exposing it. Maybe mods are a bit jumpy  given this a fresh board and lots of attacks are underway glad that you are not nigger dick anon chimmping out all over the board right now.

1723608955942511.gif
[Hide] (2.8MB, 480x246)

>>508
Honestly my brain doesn't even work like that so I didn't realize. Inflammatory homoerotic sexual banter with the Anons might not couple best with pedo gate pictures. Noted, but no promises. I'm kinda retarded.

>>497
>>485
>>484 (OP) 
>Allowable pedoshit
There is no such thing ofcourse.
Without reposting the same images like a reddit troon, to recap: The images were pizzagate related, chuck schumer looking jew kissing some 5 year old girl on the lips. 
Posts of this nature require nuance, and are definitely allowed to be discussed, but we have a spoiler function for a reason, not everyone is keen on eyeballing degeneracy 24/7.

We have 4skin for that.

the ban was 10 minutes btw, all it did was make sure you understood, no more no less.
certainly wasn't pointing fingers at you btw anon >>503
The mention of pedoshit reinforces clearly what kind of dreck we want to avoid.


If this is an issue then let's discuss how and where we draw the line.
Having this type of content, albeit legal, spoilered is not that big of an ask. Especially as it invites CP spam as we have already seen.

>>520
Sounds good to me. Thanks for the response. I suspected it wasn't illegal because of the ban message. I was a bit concerned about how making that type of ban message public gives people the wrong idea about board culture when they have no context though.

>>522
You're welcome.
In hindsight, the wording with lack of context might insinuate something else completely, other then what the intent really was.
So hopefully that clears up.

It sure helps having direct feedback with moderation unlike that place made 4 cucks