/meta/ - Suggestions

Feedback for the team


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


T4881.JPG
[Hide] (976.2KB, 1600x1200)
Another Anon posted:
>I think what might be a good idea is to have every board have some curated threads with required information to knpw for every subject. /g/ has anti-malware, best practices, resource sites; /out/ has some survival links; /o/ has most reliable vehicles, links on how to lewrn repair; etc. It's all very subjective, but it would immensely help people looking for good information, and a curated sticky with good links for every board subject would be great.

Not a bad Idea. 

Further:
>I'd like to see an locked example board containing the nonsense that 4Chan has in /pol/, /his/, /x/ as an object lesson of do not do this.

I'd like to get a better understanding of this one, but It may merit consideration.
Might be a good surrogate for the "Questions that don't deserve their own threads" Threads that used to be on each board on other chans.

Also, you guys might consider a donation button at the bottom for operating costs like an archive server or library integration.
GitGud repo already has the code, I believe.
Replies: >>2986 >>2987
>>2985 (OP) 
I am the one running the site. I agree that both of these would be a good addition.

As for donations, I have been hesitant to add a donation option as altchans have a history of dying out. I didn't want to have people send me money if the board was going to be dead in a few months. Also, operating costs are very low (for now.)

Compared to other altchans, we are doing very well for how new we are (when 4chan was down I compared our /pol/ board's activity to other chans /pol/ board and we were the 4th most active) so I think we will be alright. It's also been about 4 months since we launched. Donation options should be coming soon.
Last edited by admin
Replies: >>2988 >>2990
>>2985 (OP) 
Frankly I want a thread for /r/ that has refutations for all the idiot "larpagan," "christcuck" accusations that are currently cluttering it up.

But as for the example threads, the mods and most anons, have been against low effort, 4/shill/ style posting. Making specific rules against every single thing is worse than useless. Providing a general example of what will get banned/deleted/moved would work much better. The board'd also have example glow action, pulled from the archives for newnons to familiarize themselves with ((( action ))). Show, don't tell.
Replies: >>2991 >>2993
>>2986
If you do decide to allow donos, please allow bitcoin lighting tips, they're so easy to use.
Replies: >>2989
>>2988
ACK! Fucking autocorrect. LIGHTNING not lighting.
IMG_8848.JPG
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1777x1333)
>>2986

Hey there SpaceMonkey.
I'm well aware. 
The drop in Dopamine junkies IS going to be temporary. 
The feedback was stellar, and now that denizens of "The CHANS" are aware that something really good exists out there, they'll be back. Sharty has been panned by ANY anon who goes there looking for something moar than grade school antics, and 4fags is just as pozzed and b0tridden as evar.
I get it, not wanting to throw "Good munny after bad" sort of thing. I've been watching the PPD counts and they are as expected.
If considered in the light of a chess game, this is still in the opening moves.
Putting a donations button is truly more well suited to a "Midgame" where there are ~3-4k PPD and the boards all have a more even traffic flow, i'd guess)

Also, just so you know it really is me...
WHAT IS BUMPLIMIT?
kek
>>2987
Generally speaking stickies are for information that everyone agrees on and is sick to death of telling everyone new who pulls up the board. So like on /o/, the list of reliable cars is there because otherwise every other thread is a first post from somebody who's only there to figure out what used car to buy. Give him a sticky with the answer to his question and he doesn't clutter the board with yet another thread about a solved topic. 

By contrast "larpagan" vs "christcuck" is a very active debate with much disagreement and the posters on the board could never agree on what should be said in the sticky. Personally I see no use to the board if not to hash out the religion debate, probably over the course of many years (and to keep those easy engagement farming threads off of /pol/).
Replies: >>2992 >>2993
>>2991
Yes. The problem are threads like:
https://ourchan.org/r/thread/23.html
Or the ever present Jesus wuz a sandnigger/kike that keep getting spammed. The sticky would just nip those in the bud allowing us to get on to more interesting subjects.
Replies: >>2994
Agnostic_Dyslexic_insomniac_staying_up_all_night_wondering_if_there_really_IS_a_doG..jpg
[Hide] (131.1KB, 970x697)
>>2991
fair point.
Certainly a troll isn't going to regard a dedicated thread regardless.
>>2987
Absolutely no reason you couldn't have a dedicated thread for refutations and then they can either go >>>/there/ or they could be compelled to to create their own.
I do know from lurking /r/ to which you refer. Honestly does seem like a Rabbi, and you know how (((They)) are.
I have no doG in that fight, I can see benefits either way.
Replies: >>2994
>>2992
Call me controversial but I don't think either the thread you linked or questions about Jesus's relationship to Jews are settled questions that a sticky could reasonably cover. I'm not saying they're right, but just that they're not obviously wrong to everyone's satisfaction. And just in the interest of fairness I'd feel the same way about any criticism of paganism that went something along the lines of 
>Well we don't know what paganism was because all the records are destroyed
or any of those similarly common critiques of it. Or any criticisms of atheism. If there's another system of spirituality that even a few people are into, whatever it is, sure, let's question it.

You didn't manage to be even-handed with your examples in this post. To be completely honest you are sounding less like someone with a legitimate concern for discussion quality and more like someone who wants the win that debate via moderator fiat by having your preferred talking points in a sticky; which would allow you to get on to more "interesting" Christian discussions, but only by exiling other discussions out of hand. If that's unfair I'm sorry, but if it is fair, at least take a second to think twice about it.

I'll stand by my assessment that the right or whatever you want to call this cultural sphere is not at all settled on the question of the religion it prefers, and that therefore the debate on that point shouldn't be stifled. It wouldn't in fact be stifled by a sticky, but there's no reason to try either.

>>2993
Well, trolls aren't going to post on /r/ at all. They're going to take their engagement farming thread to /pol/, put in a line that says something like
>THIS IS POLITICAL BECAUSE
like they're arguing with 4kill mods still and if they get moved to /r/ they're going to abandon it because the board is too slow. They don't care about discussion they just like posturing on one side or the other for the dopamine rush.

Which to me is the other great benefit to /r/; having a board to put those threads on will ruin the motivation to make Christian vs Pagan threads for trolls because they won't get enough attention, but anyone with a sincere interest will be happy to discuss further on /r/.
Replies: >>2995 >>2996
>>2994
>Well, trolls aren't going to post on /r/ at all
Yeah, Were you not here for DOOOGIE?
He Trolled EVERYWHERE.
And while I agree with much of the rest of it, I think you'll find trolls anywhere there are controversial subjects.
Hell, Even 4kill's /ck/ was getting trolled all the time.
ANYWHERE.
But they do target /pol/ significantly more.
>put in a line that says something like
>THIS IS POLITICAL BECAUSE
Kek!
YES they did... yes indeed.
>>2994
Have you read those threads? There is almost nothing about paganism for or against in /r/, which is a shame because I'd like to know more. Nor is there much in the way of Christian/pagan debate. There are, however, persistent spammers that do nothing but copypasta out of context bible verses and heresies. Those need to be dealt with.
Replies: >>2997 >>2998 >>3076
>>2996
I agree. There is one thread that has potential.
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/460.html
The rest have just been containment for the roaming rabbi, Mormons, and other obvious D&C tactics. I'm going to fill that thread with more groups and organizations and religions of note, but it's not quite the same unless it's coming from practicing members of different groups.
>>2996
What about this one?
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/89.html
Or responses to this thread?
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/33.html

And what, are we going to say that there will never be such threads because the first 600 didn't include any?

Again, I think even a thread like this;
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/43.html
is absolutely vital. I understand that it makes people on one side upset, but post 33 up there would also piss off pagans, so we can't say that just pissing off one side makes it a troll thread. Both sides have sincere concerns.

Let them fight. A sticky can't help until they fight.
Replies: >>2999 >>3000
>>2998
>https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/43.html
That one is word-for-word copypasta from D&C threads on 4fags. The only one asking about non-trannified Pagan groups is the only genuine of the three I can see. Don't forget that a row of threads were created at once by an ESL with broken English (likely pajeet or kike) specifically for D&C in /r/. The third one is one of the three he created.
Replies: >>3003
>>2998
>Missing the point
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/43.html
Notice how the anon there just spams crap, never responds to arguments, and is using D&C copypasta from 4Chan. It's a troll or a fed.
Replies: >>3001 >>3003
>>3000
This. It's the same person that made 43.
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/43
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/21.html
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/79.html
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/500.html
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/23.html
https://www.ourchan.org/r/thread/437.html

Note the broken English and/or same poor use of spacing / commas in most of these D&C threads, besides the same use of highlighting and letters. You can see too that they were made within fairly short periods of each other (a day perhaps or same day).
Replies: >>3003
>>2999
>>3000
>>3002
There is no broken English there, just minor typos. Only three of those threads at the top used the "formatting" of red text - also being early ones are we surprised a human would want to use the neat new board functions that 4chan doesn't have?

These are very weak arguments to say that the person posting these doesn't believe in them or isn't raising legitimate points. Again it comes across less as genuine concern for discussion quality and more as a desire to squelch opposition via moderation.

I think if you have problems with those threads you should go in and destroy them with the weight of your counterarguments, not complain to the management.
Replies: >>3004 >>3005
>>3003
<Samaritan's are a splinter sect from Judaism that spit off at some point it has many things in common like a book similar to the Torah but also differences between the Torah and the texts of the sematitian tribe One major difference is the mountain that Samaritans consider holy is not in Jeresulum but is instead Mount Gerizim in Palestine. The tribe faced possible extension but has been getting its numbers back up. Its an interesting look into what early Judaism might have looked like
<What is  the true Chrtianity or  the right one? Catholic ,Orthodox, Oriental Orthdox, Protestant ,Baptist ,Evengelical ,Christian Identity or maybe pentecostal. They all can't be right or they wouldn't be a separate sect they would agree with the true Chrtianity.
<Are we literally supposed to cut off our balls ? Or just live like eunuchs? What do these words of jesus mean?
<these folk are full of the sprit hallelujah!
It's not mere typos. It's shitty English from an ESL. The fact you chose this of all things to try to counter me with is hilarious. Most of these were created by the same person, specifically for division fagging.
>I think if you have problems with those threads you should go in and destroy them with the weight of your counterarguments, not complain to the management.
I'll do what I please, nigger.
Replies: >>3006
>>3003
You can't argue with trolls, idiot. Are you the troll?
Replies: >>3006
>>3004
That's one block of text out of the six threads you pointed to. One thread and one poster does not a generalized case make. 
>>3005
Calling everyone who disagrees with you a troll is a tactic.

What does any of this have to do with a sticky anyway? You know, the topic we were discussing? Having a sticky would not make those threads not get posted. Both of you have gotten way off topic, turning a discussion about a sticky into a set of attacks both on me and on whoever you dislike who's posting in /r/. You're basically trying to have the argument here that you should be having there. If you want to call the dude ESL and shit on him, have at it, I'm not opposed. I'm just pointing out that a sticky would have zero effect on these points of contention because they are in fact points of contention and not settled topics, and stickies are only for settled topics. So there's no case for a sticky until you can show that there's general consensus on those topics and I'm done replying until such a case is made.
Replies: >>3009 >>3010 >>3016
>>3006
>That's one block of text out of the six threads you pointed to. One thread and one poster does not a generalized case make. 
It's the opening posts from four different threads, all of which I suspected (and I am damn well certain) to be the same poster and OP. The fact you confused them as a single block from one poster reinforces my point exactly. They are from one poster. All of the English sucked from them.
>>3006
>I'd like to see an locked example board containing the nonsense that 4Chan has in /pol/, /his/, /x/ as an object lesson of do not do this.
The sticky would obviously address the issues mentioned above and display just cause for deletion. For example, it's settled, and exceedingly obvious, that the cucksperg and other trolls are not conductive to any sort of discussion. 

I and the other anon want /r/ to be a constructive board, not a morass of trolls. You want to leave the trolls alone.
Replies: >>3013 >>3035
>>3010
>I and the other anon want /r/ to be a constructive board, not a morass of trolls. You want to leave the trolls alone.
Yes. This. I wanted /r/ to have at least some semblance of an ethnic European first religion and discussion board, on top of discussion of other religions / constructive topics. I understood it would inevitably serve as containment for off-topic /pol/ posts or even D&C, but having it ALL be D&C is absurd.
Replies: >>3035
To be very clear here, I am grateful for the creation of /r/. Slowgold, I believe, reluctantly made the board after we requested it. I'm merely baffled a bit why such a board which is highly prone to D&C and off-topic isn't treated the same as off-topic and D&C elsewhere.

You can check the hyperlinks I posted. 4/6 at least were by one author. 2/6 matches open copy-and-paste things we've seen on 4chan or elsewhere. 

If people shit up /ck/, /tv/, or /x/, I've called it out equally as much.
>>3006
That troll has been refuted multiple times over multiple threads. The sheer amount of duplicity is amazing and when proven wrong, it just constantly bakes new threads and spams posts w/o any consideration for whether or not it has been disproved.

It raised a couple good points and I enjoyed the castration and circumcision issues being resolved. Go check those out. Yet it just continues to spam more of the same. I want a sticky where shit like that is called out and anons can move into arguing the nuances of religion instead of drowning beneath endless waves of:
>Christ wuz a sandnigger
>Jews snip dicks
and so on.
Replies: >>3025
Robo-Rabbi.jpg
[Hide] (103.5KB, 666x666)
RoboREKT.jpg
[Hide] (75.1KB, 720x720)
>>3016
>That troll has been refuted multiple times over multiple threads. The sheer amount of duplicity is amazing and when proven wrong, it just constantly bakes new threads and spams posts w/o any consideration for whether or not it has been disproved.
I did see that.
It was textbook "arguing with a ((( LEFTIST )))"
I don't think it was Doogie Either, since he hasn't the Gorm to reply in that sort of volume, or with any considerable arguments.
Can I get a Rabbi-B0T pic?
>searches Startpage
>First hit
>Pic1 rel
>pic 2 Reaction
>>3010
>>3013
I reject the assertion that they're trolls just because they post ideas you don't like or agree with. This is especially obvious because even in the threads you're quoting other people are piling in on OP's side. You are asking for moderator fiat to enforce your own points of view on /r/ via sticky. That is what this dogpile is about.
>But I've seen the idea/post before on 4chan
Why does that mean it's not genuine? You've never posted an idea twice? You've never posted something you believe in there and then reposted it here? Maybe it's not genuine but maybe it is and both would look roughly the same. An autist who had a sincere grudge against Christianity could easily make posts exactly like that, the same way an autist with a sincere grudge against paganism could make similar posts.
>But he never grants points it's bad faith
You're never talking to the opposition but the lurkers who will believe him until you show otherwise. The point of the debate is so the audience can decide. This whole fucking debate here has been bad faith but I've kept trucking on.

And if the problem is just that the poster has a cunty tone or his grammar/spelling isn't perfect, well might as well close down the whole site. Those shitflinging fights are what /r/ is for and nothing should be done to stop them. Those groups (including you two apparently) need to fight it out in a place which keeps a record, which ourchan can do. Then the people can decide.

So quit asking for the ref to make your opponent lose and go win.
Replies: >>3040 >>3041 >>3053
>>3035
That doesn't matter. What matters is that the troll is spamming everywhere with low quality rhetoric and mis-quoted scripture. It makes it easy to disprove, but them he goes on unceasingly. You might disagree, but the behavior shown is text book ((( D&C ))) and ((( troll ))). Why you are defending him beats me. The mods job is to handle spammers, shills, and cp. You want them not to do their job.

>But I've seen the idea/post before on 4chan... Genuine
Yes as copypasta spammed in D&C threads. Look it up in the archives. Stop being duplicitous.

>paganism
And yet that hardly shows up compared to the drive by "christ-cuck" spamming. Most Christians behave slightly better than that, irregardless of other issues. It is either some ass-blasted doge-poster or a fed.

>Insinuating that he alone is arguing in good faith and everyone else is in bad faith.
Your entire post is nothing but pilpul, duplicity and out right lies. You are defending a incoherent troll that is as emotionally compromised as a trannie. And yet you alone are in good faith. Let the reader decide.

>the poster has a cunty tone or his grammar/spelling isn't perfect
Blatant lying. One error or two is one thing but:
<Samaritan's are a splinter sect from Judaism that spit off at some point it has many things in common like a book similar to the Torah but also differences between the Torah and the texts of the sematitian tribe One major difference is the mountain that Samaritans consider holy is not in Jeresulum but is instead Mount Gerizim in Palestine. The tribe faced possible extension but has been getting its numbers back up. Its an interesting look into what early Judaism might have looked like
<What is  the true Chrtianity or  the right one? Catholic ,Orthodox, Oriental Orthdox, Protestant ,Baptist ,Evengelical ,Christian Identity or maybe pentecostal. They all can't be right or they wouldn't be a separate sect they would agree with the true Chrtianity.
<Are we literally supposed to cut off our balls ? Or just live like eunuchs? What do these words of jesus mean?
<these folk are full of the sprit hallelujah!
The sheer amount of retardation here could only be a ESL divisionfag. See previous posts by other anons. Why are making this argument again? You've no legs. Quit it with the false equivocation.

>Those shitflinging fights are what /r/ is for and nothing should be done to stop them.
Some honesty at last. You are either the troll, are working with him, or somehow agree with him. Given the sheer amount of dishonesty on display, I think you are a Fed seeking to drag everything down to 4toilet. The record is that the cucksperg is a spamming shill, arguing in extremely bad faith, and can't even spell. You want /r/ to be more of the same. Go tell your boss it will never be a real woman.
Replies: >>3043 >>3049 >>3053
>>3035
<I reject the assertion that they're trolls just because they post ideas you don't like or agree with. 
I don't know why you are insisting on being a disingenuous nincompoop, but I will refute you point-by-point once again. Don't pretend to know my beliefs or biases. You don't.
>This is especially obvious because even in the threads you're quoting other people are piling in on OP's side.
You don't know shit, so stop trying to psycho-analyze me. I've posted plenty both for and against the other anon's apparent beliefs for many years. I've done it plenty on here too.
>You are asking for moderator fiat to enforce your own points of view on /r/ via sticky. That is what this dogpile is about.
Wrong. I am the advocate for the quality of delivery, not the content, on /r/. I don't give two flying fucks about the Christian vs Paganism debates. I welcome them; the only thing of concern to me is the quality of discussion, rather than openly inviting shit-tier rage-baiting and flooding of quality threads.
>Why does that mean it's not genuine? Maybe it's not genuine but maybe it is and both would look roughly the same. 
You are being disingenuous once again, willfully so. Copypasta that line by line follows kikes pretending to be LARP pagans or kikes LARPing as christcucks that's easily seen on 4chan is not authentic material or quality discussion. You seem young, so I'm going to put this in terms you understand: that shit is the same tier as 'Politically speaking, is coffee good for you?' for /r/ instead of /pol/. The fact you don't possess the experience or noticing ability to spot this is not a fault on my end.
>An autist who had a sincere grudge against Christianity could easily make posts exactly like that, the same way an autist with a sincere grudge against paganism could make similar posts.
This is probably your only good point. There is a chance of this, and it could be some absolute autist to do it on all threads, at every hour, for years on end at 4chan but I doubt it somehow. There's plenty of screenshots of memeflags doing this until they accidentally post with their Israeli flag, to counter-point it.
>You've never posted an idea twice? You've never posted something you believe in there and then reposted it here? 
>And if the problem is just that the poster has a cunty tone or his grammar/spelling isn't perfect, well might as well close down the whole site. Those shitflinging fights are what /r/ is for and nothing should be done to stop them. Those groups (including you two apparently) need to fight it out in a place which keeps a record, which ourchan can do. Then the people can decide.
Once again, fully disingenuous. You were gas-lighting me earlier by pretending I was crazy for noticing at least four were by the same anon until you unintentionally mistook four separate OP posts as from one thread, exactly like I was saying. Now you're shrugging it off like you always knew it all along and it's no big deal. This is Grade A pilpul material.

And no, I've never fucking posted even two threads in any board to my knowledge in 20 years on any chan in such a short period of time, let alone on the same topic matter.
>So quit asking for the ref to make your opponent lose and go win.
Go fuck yourself. I go after any shit that's low quality, on any board. I've done this for nearly every board on this chan. To the contrary, it seems you have your own sacred cow which you're pretending you don't have while levitating above the rest of us. Your shit stinks.
Replies: >>3042 >>3043 >>3053
>>3041
This is my last post, by the way. I will put my viewpoints into clear unambiguous bullet points.
>I'm not for or against a sticky due to any personal belief systems leaning either way. I think it could be a valuable tool to at least contain cross-contamination of threads, instead of flooding every thread in there with genuine or disingenuine mud-slinging on points.
>I am an advocate of maintaining quality of delivery, exactly like every other board's consensus of what quality constitutes. Nobody likes 'Is coffee good for you, politically speaking?' in /pol/. Nobody likes 'Dustborn is actually a great game and we should all pre-order it.' on /v/. Nobody likes 'Here's why The Last of Us has an ugly actress as the main character compared to the first videogame and why that's a good thing.' on /tv/. Every board has this. Spamming of christkike circumcision posting in every thread in /r/ is the equivalent.
>/r/ is inevitably going to be a containment board for shitty /r/-tier threads. This is fine. Let's not have the entire board be openly flooded with shitty D&C threads on either side. Battleground threads are fine; let's have threads that don't have cross-contamination equally as much.
>I am the anon who pushed for a lot of /r/-tier threads (including the shit ones) to be moved over to /r/. I will continue to contact the mods or anyone else over low-quality shit-tier threads on any board, /r/ included.
Replies: >>3043 >>3053
>>3040
The scripture isn't even "mis-quoted," it's direct quotes from the book. But there's no way to convince a person with a bias that they don't have a bias.
>I think you are a Fed
This is your mask-off moment, not mine. People have to agree with you or they're a boogeyman; that's your position.
>>3041
>I welcome them; the only thing of concern to me is the quality of discussion, rather than openly inviting shit-tier rage-baiting and flooding of quality threads.
The problem is that you can't point to anything objective which makes these threads obviously "low quality" other than that they include points you feel have been definitively responded to already. These threads wouldn't get the amount of interest they have always received if that were actually true. The other critiques; that one guy posted a couple threads, that the spelling and grammar aren't 100% on point, that they include scripture but in a way you don't like; are not indicators that the board is being "flooded" or that the posts don't raise legitimate points. The posts I'm being linked to as examples of "obvious trolling" have direct quotes of scripture and ask discussion questions based on them or post interpretations of what they mean, what would a religion board be for if not discussing the tenets of a religion in that fashion? That's why I don't believe the complaint here is the quality of the post, but the direction of content. 

I have never stated that I thought you were crazy and I granted that the red text threads were all very similar, my point wasn't about you but that this doesn't 100% guarantee a samefag. I have not insulted either of you but both of you are now either directly calling me a Fed or using key words to imply I'm jewish, continuations of personal attacks you started almost immediately. You even took the time to assert that I'm younger than you and talk down to me; nice.

I don't think there's any more to say on this other than that a sticky is obviously uncalled for when the board itself is not determined on the issues you want the sticky to address. I'm not levitating above anything - it is you who thinks he should be exempted from debate.
>>3042
>/r/ is inevitably going to be a containment board for shitty /r/-tier threads. This is fine. Let's not have the entire board be openly flooded
And you're basically just giving up the point here, that's what I've been saying this whole time. If the point of the sticky is not to say "well that shitflinging thread is already addressed in the sticky so now let's delete it," what is the point of it? The sticky will then accomplish nothing other than making me scroll a bit further to find the first thread.

The only point to a sticky is to set rules for how posting goes, if it's not going to do that there's no reason to have it. If you're at least bartered down to letting discussion happen, then you don't need to reply anymore, I'm content.
Replies: >>3044 >>3053
>>3043
>misquoted
Taking something out of context is absolutely misquotation. You can argue about what the context is but the context as promoted by Jews is always invalid.

>Putting lies in my mouth
If it walks like a duck... You have done nothing but pilpul, misconstrue, and out right lie. This doesn't work so well when it's in writing. The debacle when you tried to gaslight the other anon and he called you out on it, the constant implications that everyone else is crazy/in bad faith, the sheer duplicity it takes to argue that blatant copypasta spam is genuine or that the absolutely shitty writing shown above is genuine and not the work of a ESL shill. I'd almost admire your balls if you hadn't cut them off already.

>The problem is that you can't point to anything objective which makes these threads obviously "low quality" other than that they include points you feel have been definitively responded to already.
Does low effort D&C copypasta spam ring a bell. The fact you can claim this while ignoring the entire thread is astounding.

The complaint is about the quality. The other anon has made that clear as well. You obviously don't want /r/ to have anything approaching thoughtful discussion. You are willfully ignoring that the troll when answered, does not respond, and continues to spam the same shit.

>Implying we are crazy.
Come out and say it.
>Playing fast and loose with probability.
Willfully ignoring reality does not change reality.

The board absolutely is determined on these issues, sticky or no. The sticky is merely there to demonstrate just cause.

>the point of the sticky is not to say "well that shitflinging thread is already addressed in the sticky so now let's delete it
>The only point to a sticky is to set rules for how posting goes
You are contradicting yourself. That is exactly the point of a sticky... Do not fling shit, which the copyspam absolutely is. Here's why it's shit and going to be deleted. And any anon can read the reasons up the thread.

The other anon and I have called you out for being a Jewish fed because you have done nothing but act like one. At this point there is no reason to continue arguing with you. It is up to the jannies.

Inb4 You are going to respond with more of the same. If it's more lying, willful obtuseness and pilpul you need not bother.
Replies: >>3053
I wanna chime in lads. Whats the issue with /r/?
Replies: >>3053
>>3040
>And yet that hardly shows up compared to the drive by "christ-cuck" spamming.
What is this cope? Christianity is a bedrock religion of Europe and NA for 2000 years, it is just natural that people making threads are real people who come from those religious backgrounds. Modern paganism is forced and has nothing to do with paganism of old which shouldnt even have a concentrated name as whatever people did was decentralized and subject of change like in every religion, but the decentralization here is the key.
Replies: >>3053
T4881-1_unimpressed.JPG
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1777x1333)
>>3035
>>3040
>>3041
>>3042
>>3043
>>3044
>>3048
>>3049
OKAY FAGGOTS, Have you finished Shitting up My thread with this OFF TOPIC religious Quibbling?
Make your OWN thread addressing it.
This has NOTHING to do with OPSEC, Need to knows, or even a donation button.
Sure, /r/ may have a Pilpul SHILL
This IS NOT the place for discussing this.
Replies: >>3055
...Tiresom....JPG
[Hide] (624.1KB, 1488x1111)
Don't say I never gave ya Nothin'
>>>/meta/3051
Replies: >>3055
>>3053
We have /dag/, perhaps /sow/ for pol. 

/out/ should have a list of advice & reccs. backpacking, rv, cross-country.

/o/ needs an updated car recsheet, possibly links to repair manuals. 

/g/ needs a cyper/sec/ sticky and links to the /g/wiki.

/lit/ should have links to online libraries.

/diy/ would be more of the same.

/hell/ should have a rickroll.

>>3054
What?
Replies: >>3056
Spoiler File
(3.4MB, 640x640)
Spoiler File
(5.3KB, 250x250)
Spoiler File
(1.3MB, 296x160)
>>3055
>/hell/ should have a rickroll.
Checked and KEK'd
Yeah, Well, WE need to make them, Then have the Mods decide to sticky-(they most likely will)
>3055
>What?
The hyperlink for the arguing acolytes 
Roll over it if you aren't PhoneFagging
Replies: >>3057
>>3056
We can crib from zzzchan and other dead chans elsewhere which will make things easier.
For example:
>https://zzzchan.xyz/fit/thread/2.html

As we get more anons, these things will naturally happen, especially in conjunction with ourchive.
Replies: >>3058
IMG_6212.JPG
[Hide] (2.9MB, 3264x2448)
>>3057
>We can crib from zzzchan and other dead chans
Do we need to?
I mean, I've probably created over 20 threads here. It's not hard..
If you mean copypasta for content, maybe, but was your intent that it just be a locked board with info added,(by Mods) as it matures and info changes? Or more like a stickied board that gets changed every once in a while after it hits 1000?
<Kek! I still don't know what bump limit is--this is turning into a running joke.kek.
5b4f650b118d979a981037ddcaa60acfdb61306c3be6109f03c5c2ffc8a76f31.png
[Hide] (8.5KB, 302x178)
>>3058

1000 - we can change it

- SpaceMonkey
Replies: >>3061 >>3064
>>3058
Remember the fiasco a few weeks back. That happened because the mods were experimenting with bump limits. The response to that was to not have any till ourchive is ready.

>>3060
Nvmd
Replies: >>3064
>>3058
The former looks like a good idea.  Anons can rec and submit content.
>>3058
If you're talking about the example board, I would be trivial to crib stuff from 4plebs.
>>3059
>>3060
Diggit.
After the Dooogie shit, I just wondered since he seemed to be trying to slide shit right off the boards.
Thanks again guys, for all the hard work and hair pulling you must have done.
As you may know, I'm not on TG anymore, but I may try the new SimpleX since that one anon around week 3 was so adamant that "This iz the WAE!!1!"
I really was loling though, because I truly didn't know.
>>3061
I 'member
Replies: >>3066 >>3068
>>3064
>Simplex
Pretty awesome on the phone and functionality wise. Only problem I've had is that it is a pain in the arse to install to Debian 12.
Replies: >>3071
When are we gonna have collector`s board, real collecting also implies some kind of diy aswell.
Replies: >>3069 >>3071
>>3064
For privacy SimpleX is great. My main issues is there's no way to sync between PC and your phone. There probably will never be since this compromises privacy. So I have 2 accounts.

Also it was eating up my phone battery, had to set it to periodic sync (check msg every 10 mins) its fine now.
Replies: >>3071
>>3067
Collectors board?
>>3066
That's reminding me to update my images
I'll have to see if the /g/uys rattling around over there have some good tips for phone SEC too.
BTW, /g/ should probably be the most crosslinked board in the other N2K(Need to know) threads we're proposing here.
>>3067
Threadworthy in /gen/ --Ah, now I see the issue. Probably need to wait until the anons trickle back--They will.
I'd suspect by Thurs./Friday there will be a bump in PPH/D
>>3068
Good tip.
I too would be using both the 'Droid and the Lappy.
I just had to kill TG since I'd be Doxxable if someone went digging too hard, and the PYD was just becoming obnoxious enough, he might've actually paid someone with skillz
I Can't have that.
Replies: >>3072
>>3071
Where'd my Check-Devil go?
Replies: >>3075
>>3072
Triggered auto mod?

Can someone tell me what collecting is.
Replies: >>3078
>>2996
>copypasta out of context bible verses and heresies
Example of a copypasta?
Replies: >>3077
Continuing on sticky brainstorming.
/ck/ can have some good basic recipes, possibly a cross post with /fit/.

/fit/ has a basic workout plan, diet

/a/ can have a list of recommendations. Places to pirate content.

/v/... game reccs. Where to pirate.

/sci/... Anna's archive, cross link to /g/, warning about ((( dissapearences ))) links to good sci resources.

>>3076
Go to /r/ and scroll around. You'll find it quick. Then plug it into 4plebs. Also, the threadbaker has asked us to stop. This is not the thread.
Replies: >>3079 >>3083
>>3075
>Triggered auto mod?
Probably. 
>me what collecting is.
Action figures, baseball cards, funko pops, Pepes and Apus, video game cartridges...
>>3077
>Also, the threadbaker has asked us to stop. This is not the thread.
Thank you, Fren.
There is another thread, just for that discussion.
>>>/meta/3051
Heavn'ly_Checked.jpg
[Hide] (143.1KB, 777x999)
>>3077
Also, Good stuff.
I think each board should have a thread Calling for things they want and for INFO that will go into the N2K thread,(just rolling with that designation for ease,IDC, it can be anything, but should be at least a similar designation on each board.)
 THIS SHOULD BE STICKIED  Then, after the board works out what they want in the N2K thread, mock ups or whatever, then they can ask the Mods here in /meta/ to please unsticky the seed thread and sticky the agreed upon N2K and lock it.
Alternately, Some enterprising Anon can just work one up and have upgrades swapped out as before...
3rd Position: At a certain point IF every board eventually gets a MOD,(we're talking Longview here,) that Mod will be in charge of taking new info/upgrades for that board's N2K.

It really doesn't need to be complicated, and It REALLY shouldn't tax the current Mods/Space with constant calls for "Please change this, PLS delet that, Etc."
There should be No MORE than a once a week request in the beginning, and after that, almost NONE.
Replies: >>3085
>>3083
How should these stickies be formatted?

I'm thinking board specific rules should be on another sticky. 

The thread pic should be eye-catching, the title and subject some version of look here first. Then a TL;DR equivalent and some immediate info-graphics and posts. Then a table of contents and the rest of the information.
Replies: >>3101
Sticky_Wicket.jpg
[Hide] (81.8KB, 444x999)
>>3085
KEK!
>Von OursBurg's catastrophe of infinite sticky regression
<It's Stickies, Stickies, STICKIES ALL the way down!!"
Do any other anons want to weigh in?
Replies: >>3108
Toad_Away.._...JPG
[Hide] (721.6KB, 1488x1111)
>>3103
Sorry if I offended Fren, I was just making a bit of a joke.
I do think there should be an ALL-in-One sticky, but I also think the posters in the boards should ultimately form them how they want to.
Anything that is put up now will almost certainly have changes implemented,(the by the posters who are in earnest I mean, not the trollish ones,) so a certain flexibility and organic growth might be most favorable.
<I am also OP. No offense intended.
Replies: >>3109
>>3108
Yeah, it just needs to get anons thinking
Replies: >>3113
Thinking_HAT.JPG
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1800x1350)
Diversity_hires.webm
[Hide] (1.9MB, 500x889, 00:20)
Tipping_in_esrever.webm
[Hide] (2.1MB, 640x360, 00:45)
>>3109
This.
(OP again)
It's strange how many newcomers to the boards wanted to implement B&Hammers and heavy restrictions-(or conversely strict parameters on what to post and where,) since we've already been through the NiggerDickSpammer™
(That always makes me chuckle a bit since he was copying off my habit of satirically putting "™" on all kinds of POZZ,) and then the deluge of DOGE droppings for the next 3 months.
Ironically, it was these incursions and affronts to the site that kicked the dev and Mods into "Hardening MODE" and made the flood of 4FAIL refugggees much easier to handle due to the modifications.
Sure, it was messy, but even though it's arguable that there's a lot more refinement to go, much of the Technicals have been worked out favorably.
There was an anon who asked about B&ing Niggers on /ck/ so it could be a refuge from the onslaught we endure everyday IRL and in ((( MEDIA ))), an my reply was;
>"NOPE! while Nigger Worship and aggrandizement should rightfully receive the contempt that it merits, limiting posters from even the ability to post the retarded antics of niggers as they Ape the actions of Whites, and flagrantly display their unsuitability to adapt to Western White culture should absolutely be allowed.
>If nothing else as a cautionary tale to stay the fuck out of restaurants and fast food joints.
Replies: >>3220
>>3113
Anons are used to heavy censorship of the internet. Now they want the ring for themselves knowing not, like Boromir, of the true curse thereof.
Replies: >>3690
Bumping a Thread that needs MOAR visibility..(OP)
>>3220
>Now they want the ring for themselves knowing not, like Boromir, of the true curse thereof.
nearly every single one of the loudest complainers about moderation turns into the absolute worst kind of trannyjannies when given the hammer themselves
I used to go out of my way to get the ones complaining the most about the dumbest kind of shit nobody should realistically be complaining about to be mods, specifically because of it
Use windows, linux is woke and full of hidden 0days. Windows is aryan and only spies on minorities.
[New Reply]
68 replies | 18 files | 22 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3