/meta/ - Suggestions

Feedback for the team


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


8166e23818ea76723624fe4e47debe62c51a6c2753b1aeeb1860e62daf5ad3b4.jpg
[Hide] (280.3KB, 880x645)
Halfchan /his/ has serious problems that could be partly solved by IP range blocks. It doesn't have a big user base to begin with but such a board accompanies and potentially assists /pol/ in various ways so it would be nice to have.

However, ourchan moderation should make a decision ahead of time whether or not theological discussion should be allowed. I don't recommend it, because half the threads on the other /his/ are atheism vs theism bait threads and theological spam that belongs on a religion board. So as it stands, halfchan /his/ can't even focus on history and is constantly disrupted. If extended religious discussion (a totally separate thing from the history of religion) is allowed anywhere, it should be on a dedicated religion board /rel/ in my opinion.

A /his/ board should allow at a minimum the discussion of history, archaeology, genetics, linguistics, and anthropology. Opening the floor to the "humanities" should exclude religion but philosophy could be okay. The main issue is philosophical discussion potentially opens the door to the disruptive (a)theism bait threads. Maybe philosophy would be okay as long as that is explicitly banned along with theological debates. Otherwise philosophy would need to go to a /rel/ board.

If what I'm saying about religion sounds complicated or like a hassle, just remember history, archaeology, genetics, linguistics, and anthropology are all that's needed at a minimum. /rel/ isn't needed as badly as a simpler /his/.
Replies: >>166
1730867059766319.jpg
[Hide] (11.2KB, 225x225)
1732677918020726_(1).png
[Hide] (2MB, 699x2224)
>>145 (OP) 
Lurker here.
I agree that history and religion should be separate boards. While history and religions are deeply intertwined, religious topics actually have more in common with /x/ and /pol/. Regardless, because of the complexity of issues, /rel/ needs to be its own board. The threads would obviously contain a lot of crossover content. Who knows. It could be a smashing success, if properly moderated.

However, if you really want a successful history board, you need to allow for topics that make the common /his/fags and glowniggers start pissing themselves. Yes, I'm talking about stolen history topics. At this point there is just way too much evidence that human history has been heavily manipulated and that we've been lied to (especially in western nations) about absolutely everything.

You're going to have to allow for topics that have been wrongly pushed into 4/x/ like megalithic structure construction, giants, Tartaria and mudflood stuff -- all of which have nothing to do with the paranormal. The mainstream history nerds and the alt-history schizos need to come together and figure this shit out without resorting to endless name-calling. 4glow has been absolutely successful as a divide-and-conquer mechanism where world and human history is concerned. I mean, fuck's sake man, you can get better information from yootoob comment sections.

Also, consider this:
1] The alt-history crowd on 4glow doesn't spam threads about this stuff. They just react to bait that, to me, looks manufactured on a constant schedule. They notice things that deserve noticing and always end up in time-wasting banter with wannabe glowfags at Eglin or Ramstein. This begs the question: Why would the USAF pull their dumbest E-2 airmen from their regular time on reddit every 7-10 days just to pop into alt-history threads and call anons schizos and tell them to take their meds? After watching this happen over and over for years it's obvious that there's an agenda and the US gov has an active campaign to suppress anything outside the mainstream when it comes to history.

2] Look at how many boards 4glow has and how many threads are constantly in the catalogs. There's NO FUCKING WAY that more than 10% percent of the threads are organic. The entire site's content is mostly posted by an AI bot and shills using the language gleaned from /pol/. I went through the entire catalog on /his/ just now and it's clear that it's suffering from the same affliction as every other board. DARPA AI.

So, in conclusion, what I'm saying is that we have the potential to push the reset button here and hopefully kick the glowniggers out of the equation.
/His/ on 4chumps is basically pol lite for people on the margins who are too scared to go to the source. Whatifalthist is the perfect example of the kind of pseud it incubates. You could probably port the whole community over for the blueboards version of pol if there's interest. They have a bad Janny. The other community you might consider scooping is /k/. But all this should start out slowly and strategically so each board embryo has a nucleus of about 10 people willing to talk on it for the first few months
Replies: >>173
36bb95a55f3b20395daa234f60b2c457953651d7b6bd9503fda7536fc725f8a1.jpg
[Hide] (210.7KB, 975x615)
>>168
I like learning about (Indo-)European history. It helps to show people their roots. It gives context to modern political struggles.
[New Reply]
3 replies | 4 files | 4 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3