>>5771
>” My own definition of a good "base" would be examining the quality of the two parents' racial make-up in terms of historical record for contributions to civilization in the last few hundred years (Far East / Northern Asian / most Indigenous European ethnic groups have the best record), followed by the genes particular to their family history (hereditary disorders, physical attractiveness, athleticism, etc.), followed by socio-cultural compatibility (religion, politics, and so forth).”
>” My own chud opinion would be to view everything from the lens of your children (and their children) above all else. Will they look significantly different from you and the type of culture / state / tribe you're wishing to be a part of? Will they fit in with that culture / state / tribe? Did you avoid obvious incompatibilities?”
I absolutely see things from your chud perspective too. But with an added caveat. Each of a child’s paternal and maternal likes could be wildly different in culture from each other from the bronze-iron age to modernity, yet they can ultimately share the same deep ancestral genetics. Genetically, they are at a good spot, but identity-wised, how would they derive a clear identity from their many ancestral lineages, their cultures, beliefs, etc.. if not an exact one is super clear?
What I’m essentially asking is where does a go