>>5757
I can help two hours max per day. My hourly slot is flexible. I won't join you on telegram. As mentioned here >>>/meta/290 and here about how many people are getting arrested because the telegram founder lied about everything >>>/meta/272
>>5780
>Session
Do not do session. Do not do discord. Don't even talk if your app is dependent on phones. Such suggestions reveal you're unqualified and untrained and therefore a danger to others. So I politely suggest you keep your mouth shut and instead study up, because what you're suggesting is dangerous for other users. The secure apps are cwtch, maybe simplex chat. The flexible apps are IRC, XMPP, Mumble and finally just plain old email. Not fucking protonmail and if you haven't seen the news about tuta, obviously you're living under a fucking rock. Flexible in that it gives the option for users to roll their own security. Preferably running the app in terminal on a whonix terminal on qubes. Or at least the gui on whonix.
There's a good discussion about the faults of Simplex vs. Cwtch by the guy who invented tinfoil chat (picrel). If you don't know what Tinfoil chat is, it's what the CIA and IDF psyop you about saying HAMAS was using telephone systems in Tunnels and that's why their comms couldn't be tapped. Nope actually you can roll secure comes using something like tinfoil chat, which is just a hefty COTS hardware / circuit isolation system using something called a data diode, which instead of connecting comms through copper it transfers the data using light so that your encryption keys can never be exfiltrated unless the glowies are defying the laws of physics, which Kim Jung Un and Putin would be long dead if that was a possibility. See the discussion starts here with mapq
Markus Ottela tinfoil chat inventor: https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/simplex-vs-cwtch-who-is-right/19256/29 System overview here: https://github.com/maqp/tfc/wiki/Threat-model
Anyways cwtch or even IRC would be so much better than telegram.