/sci/ - Science

Board for natural sciences


New Reply[×]
Name
Sage
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


hubble_deep_field.jpeg
[Hide] (1.2MB, 5132x3512) Reverse
How is this even possible?  How did we end up to be so insignificant?
Replies: >>312
Oldest_star_in_solar_neighbourhood.jpg
[Hide] (545KB, 1500x1200) Reverse
>>305 (OP) 
The hubble tension along with the unexpected brightness and size of extreme deep space objects combined with the estimated ages and actual distances of some close and extremely distant objects implies that the universe is not actually universally expanding. Edwin Hubble himself to the end of his days did not believe that the universe was universally expanding. He acknowledged that many galaxies were moving away from us but he did not believe this meant the entire universe was expanding in all directions. The fact that the mainstream academia has to invent made up unobserved things like dark matter and dark energy and dark fluid means they fundamentally misunderstand the nature of the universe. It is just as likely that the universe is  a steady state system with heterogenous movement of objects within it and objects interactions with each other both locally and on the system level results in complex movements that give the appearance that everything is expanding. It is even possible that this system has always existed regardless of it being infinite or finite in spatial parameters. The point being, there are entirely relevant alternative explanations for fundamental observations of the universe that differ from the standard model (which is known to be false in many assumptions). 

Life is not insignificant. It statistically was not random in occurrence and emergence. The odds of DNA emerging and developing a single celled organism naturally by pure chance is lower than the total number of estimated particles in the known universe. The odds get even lower when you look at more complex lifeforms. And when you look at DNA actually being a coherent language which can code a trillion times a trillion different distinct lifeforms in theoretically any natural environment, even lifeforms that can live and survive in open space. It is also known that many so called "organic" compounds that are known in living organisms actually also occur in inorganic natural processes, meaning that whatever led to the development of life was more complex and intentionally directed than random chance as previously mentioned. It takes more than just slapping together organic compounds and zapping them with light/EMF to synthesize life. The implication being that biological life was intentionally designed. The question becomes what is the origin of life then? The most obvious and knowable answer is that it simply did not emerge by random chance, it was helped or created or designed by something billions of years ago or more. 

Another important aspect is the evolutionary process that life takes. It is again more than pure random chance or even natural selection within an environment. If it was the case then highly complex and evolved higher lifeforms would be less common rather than more common, as all that would be needed to thrive as an organism is the simplest necessary adaptation to thrive in said environment, even complex environments (life conditions in the soil on Mars for eg). This implies another force or aspect of evolution that is syntropic in nature and leads to the development of complex gestalt states like consciousness and supercomputer processing. To give an example. 

The human body and brain.
-Approximately 100 billion neurons
-Forming approximately 100 trillion connections
-A visual information recognition processing speed of 10-100 milliseconds
-An observed and theoretical computational information processing capability of approximately 1 exaflop (1 quintillion ops/second)
-Approximately 4,169 petabytes of digital data equivalent information storage in DNA (ATCG sequences) in a 150 lb human body
-A bio-EMF operating range of approximately 0.1-120 + Hz (including multiband operations, processing, and rectification)
-A total genome base pair size of approximately 3 billion (6 billion diplex), for comparison the smallest biological cell has roughly half a million base pairs (meaning the human being is only 6,000 times larger in genome size than the smallest organism, this means humans have astronomical information efficiency)
-The human brain despite having legitimate supercomputer specs only needs 20 watts hours of bio electricity to operate normally, this is millions of times more efficient than our modern technological supercomputers.

These traits are so specifically niche and astronomical in specification that they could not have emerged randomly or even by conventional natural selection. Again implying, specific design, even if separated across vast times to achieve this result. And these traits might not even be unique to just modern humans (which are actually a gradient of multiple other hominid species), for example many ancient hominids had even larger cranial capacity and *might* have had equally as complex brains. Remember that it is only human beings that build technological supercomputers on Earth. 

Another important consideration is consciousness. Consciousness is a gestalt state of being that is self referential, like nature and theoretically like a being that could be described and quantified as "God" (they would all be self referential as well). The development of higher consciousness in organisms is surely not a coincidence, as again for this to randomly occur by pure chance the odds are worse than astronomical. It may have emerged naturally but not randomly so. As though the universe and reality itself favors the development of higher consciousness and syntropic biological evolution. Consciousness also has a gradient, ranging from lower consciousness (minimal self awareness) to extremely complex engrams and states like emotions, thoughts, ontological philosophy, pattern recognition, spontaneous synchronization, non-local coherent reference frames both spatial and temporal, and unconscious partially coherent reference frames like dreams. And because consciousness synchronizes with itself, even between two separate individuals (two people talking to each other in person leads to their brainwaves synchronizing) as well as the fact that consciousness is the main if not only self referential frame of ontology with which we interact with reality, this means that all consciousness is inherently connected. Just as the light of a distant star or galaxy reaches your eye and is connected to you and just as waveforms interact with each other continuously, you are not necessarily truly separate from any other being with consciousness. As the field of consciousness is capable of synchronizing with itself and is capable of recognizing itself. 

This all means, that because you have life and consciousness and can contemplate on the higher philosophies of ontology, gestalt states, syntropy, synchrony, nature, the universe, and your own self. You are not insignificant. You can apply whatever significance to yourself that you like, but ultimately you and universe are inherent within or in relation to each other. And this likely did not emerge by just pure random chance, the odds are astronomically against that being the case from a purely statistical computational information processing perspective.
stirner.gif
[Hide] (49.9KB, 650x850) Reverse
I may be physically small but I'm still more important than all that hot gas and empty space. I am the Unique One. 

In fact all those galaxies are already my property, I have merely to attain power over them.

You got a peer-reviewed study showing that being physically small makes you insignificant? Or that galaxies aren't my property?
Replies: >>316 >>317
Life's meaningless
Replies: >>315
1671931340840643.jpg
[Hide] (41.9KB, 464x480) Reverse
>>314
Consciousness, like ontology itself and thus also the universe/reality itself. Is eternal, to the point of being atemporal. Your perception of time and self are merely creature comforts. Life has whatever meaning you wish to apply to it. But even beyond your limited self knowledge, there is a grander design, and designers (DNA language, universal/sacred geometry). This becomes evident in deep study of any branch of science and even scientific interpretation of religious/spiritual texts. Light itself is eternal, like energy, and even patterns (consciousness). There are higher and lower and more transcenendental domains of consciousness that you can even experience while incarnated in a human body, the easiest example is atempotality or lack of perception of time and remote non local free observation of space (consciousness is not limited by or even defined by space and time). And contrary to some's beliefs on the matter, there actually is an observable scientific objective moral/self aligned order in creation. 

The most common examples are the ability for mind over matter perception to physically manipulate reality (Dr Emoto ice crystal experiments, brainwave manipulation at will, plants grow better with directed good intentions and by talking to them they also grow better with applied EMF and consciousness is maintained in the human brain by EMF, and human emotional states are associated with distinct EMF brainwaves, meaning there is a correlation from multiple factors and variables). Good intentions/emotions, have a syntropic character (create greater order and stability and efficiency, ie opposite of entropy), while bad/negative intentions/emotions have an entropic character (create greater chaos, less efficiency, less order, less stability). 

Consciousness as maintained by the complex and extremely efficient human body/brain is inherently maintained by complex EMF fields (bio electromagnetic fields), EMF is synonymous with light (bio photo-luminescence), they are fluctuating syntropic stable resonant gestalt state waveform operations/engrams. This gestalt state even if maintained by the physical hardware of the body and chemical interactions therein, is not limited to strictly to the body, as waveforms inherently interact with one another non-locally (this is observationally confirmed in studies of spontaneous synchronization of human minds/EMF at both locally and non-locally, ie the mental field is akin to a gestalt state electric/light field). Because of this feature, the specific patterns and gestalt state that maintains your individual consciousness, will interact with non-local and local waveforms (mental/EMF fields) with or without your direct knowledge or intent, and this can even theoretically transfer stable coherence even when your hardware is destroyed/dies (via non-local entanglement/imprintment on a background medium or field). 

In metaphysical reality consciousness interface terminology (computer terminology as well) the "random" variance can be determined by conscious choices (concept of free will is the concept of choosing one thing within your control out of a system that is beyond your total immediate control or knowledge, ie free choices). Even a deterministic algorithm can allow novelty and free choice from an infinite or near infinite selection of possibilities in a matrix which has set parameters, thus even if *any* possible interaction you choose has already been determined, you are free to choose your reaction to the variables beyond your own knowledge or control thus giving novelty in your perspective and allowing free choice (both free will and free agency limited only by the infinite or near infinite possibility matrix determinations). In the same manner, you can mathematically create a finite tangible space (and time) using transcendental numbers (including infinitesimals). To avoid going in circles and to add novelty to the system, you create spiral/vortex math coordinate system in which the possibilities can play out over time and create an infinite set without ever distinctly repeating, distinct infinity. This system has already been implemented, and we call it reality. The limitations of memory can also be overcome by gestalt state transcendental math storage within the system itself, which can be accessed from anywhere within the system and which can have a fractal component which preserves the entire system from any specific point within it, the transcendental viewpoint would be super conscious and essentially omniscient and be accessible or rather connected to every infinitesimal point or consciousness within it. The question of meaning is similar then to the question of ultimate pursuit of knowledge, it may literally be infinite from the finite viewpoint and atemporal/eternal from a stable distinct transcendental gestalt viewpoint from which operations originate or are dictated. This means, it is not the gestalt transcendent state entity matrix ("God") that determines your meaning, it might simply interpret the meanings you imply and reflect them back to you synchronicistically while maintaining a level of objectivity in perception which allows you to experience novelty and free choice. Meaning, while you inherently have meaning and meaning can inherently come from beyond yourself, it is still your perception and application of meaning that is specifically intrinsic to your local operator (you). Thus, meaning or purpose comes from you (both the limited self playing the game and the atemporal infinite transcendental self that has the overview and determination matrix control). 

In short, you can and do define your own meanings and purpose with or without the transcendent matrix entity, because it is inherently a part of your interface with reality (consciousness). Part of your meaning/purpose then, is to experience (and also to evolve). And objectively (observed by all operators), some experiences have a value system determination applied to them (some experiences create greater syntropy/stability, others greater entropy/insanity). You can also have experiences in the system without suffering or causing suffering to yourself or others.
4b8076af7111fb130e195addce2d6f74cbd4660f5cd6164594d8bb20c9b84a36.png
[Hide] (176.8KB, 600x676) Reverse
>>313
based my fellow dracula
7187pSLxzHL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
[Hide] (160.6KB, 834x1000) Reverse
>>313
>peer-reviewed
>the spook of collective approval
[New Reply]
6 replies | 6 files | 7 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3