/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Everything trending affecting politics and culture


New Reply[×]
Name
Sage
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


This board is a board of peace.


11d813c10d3ff89051daf8d8571932dd3dc2d4f4f10be1ea5bc6b479328d945d.jpg
[Hide] (6.5KB, 260x298) Reverse
"There’s no wrong answer—just tell me which is worse."

>> 1. A shady cabal of elites who steal the US presidential election in 2020 because the sitting president was not sufficiently anti-white, which leads to his senile replacement allowing tens of millions of third-world immigrants to flood the United States as well as a war in Ukraine in which over half a million whites are killed?

> Or

>> 2. A shady cabal of elites who create a vast, worldwide pedophile ring which not only commits and covers up some of the most grotesque crimes imaginable—possibly including torture and cannibalism—but also controls world leaders and influential people on behalf of Israel’s Mossad through blackmail and murder?

> Of course, we’re talking about the differences between the eighth and ninth circles of Hell here. So, if you don’t have a preference, that’s fine. But I think everyone who’s not a member of the aforementioned shady cabals can agree that both options are really, really bad. What scares me, however, is that fully prosecuting the people responsible for #2 above might permanently prevent us from canceling and undoing #1. That would be really, really bad as well.

>Since he is the direct cause of #1 and is implicated somewhat in #2, President Donald Trump has been caught up in this debacle, and might also have been responsible for making it worse. It is largely through the force of this man’s implicitly pro-white perspective—relative to all other major US politicians, of course—that #1 happened at all. Then, since the 2024 election in which he regained the presidency, he has actually worked to reverse it, largely through closing the border and mass deportations of illegal aliens. He campaigned on such a platform, won the electoral and popular votes in 2024, and then largely followed through on his promises. He has also made progress eliminating or downgrading such anti-white measures as refugee resettlement, diversity visas, DEI and affirmative action, birthright citizenship, temporary protected status, and disparate impact liability. Not only this, he has also purged wokeness from the US military, limited the Left’s ability to launder money through government waste, pushed back against transgenderism on multiple fronts, and severed the FBI’s ties to the Jewish supremacist Anti-Defamation League. There’s more, of course.

1/?
Replies: >>56115
>>56114 (OP) 

>There’s also much to be frustrated about Trump. He has vacillated and disappointed on deportations. He has shown weakness and called it strength, such was when he started scaling down ICE deportation efforts in Minneapolis. He has also given us enough mixed signals about the Epstein files to be credibly accused of covering up, stonewalling, or obfuscating. Greg Johnson has the goods on all of this.

>Yet, we can all agree on several things.

• Despite all allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump found so far in the Epstein files, there is nothing credibly linking him to criminal activity.
• Under Trump’s watch, the Epstein files were released—which is more than what we can say about his predecessor Joe Biden. The most recent dump occurred after the above-linked essays were published. So despite everything Trump deserves credit for that. Without him, the Epstein files would never have seen the light of day.
• Despite the thousands of references to Trump in the Epstein files, Trump cut ties with Epstein in the mid-2000s. Yes, the email exchange from 2013 that Greg Johnson includes in his “Epstein Bomb” essay indicates that the two men might have had contact at events held by third parties after their split. But the email reveals only that Epstein knew that Trump was going to be at a certain event, not the other way around. Further, it is not inconceivable that two high-powered billionaires operating in New York City would bump into each other from time to time, whether they wanted to or not.
• It is perfectly reasonable at this point to suspect that Trump was or still is hiding something embarrassing about himself in those files. This would explain the mixed signals he has given off about them and the outright contradictory things FBI Director Kash Patel and others have said about them. Greg Johnson’s suspicions of a cover up are well founded.

2/?
Replies: >>56116
>>56115

> My take on this is that unless something comes out credibly linking Trump to a serious crime, sexual or otherwise, the Right still needs to back him—and by “back him,” I mean keeping our criticism south of character assassination and calls for his ouster. Say what you want about him, he remains light years better than the alternative. I have four main reasons for holding this position.

> First, and let me apologize in advance for engaging in the warm and fuzzies, but I just like the guy. I can’t help it. I like his fighting spirit, I like his boundless faith in himself, I like his entertainment value, I like how he’s not intimidated by the Left, and I like how he shook up the complacent Republican Party. I mean, he called Tim Walz a retard—what’s not to love about that? If you drew Venn diagrams of Trump’s outlook and mine, you would probably find more overlap than with any other Republican politician since Pat Buchanan. This instills a sense of loyalty in me, so my default with Trump is to overlook his copious flaws, downplay his failings, and focus on all the good he’s been doing. And since being sworn back in in 2025, there has been a lot of that.

> Secondly, Trump is making it his priority to undo #1 above. Yes, he is operating according to a system that might not always favor the executive. So it is understandable if his record is spotty. For example, federal judges have been blocking his efforts to end birthright citizenship since his second term began. However, he has been placing tremendous pressure on the Republicans to sponsor the SAVE America Act. This will require proof of US citizenship in order to vote. The Act passed in the House 218 to 213, and it appears that it will barely have the votes necessary to pass in the Senate. If the Act makes its way to Trump’s desk despite whatever talking filibuster the Democrats can put together, then it will become much more difficult for them to cheat. Tacitly allowing non-citizens to vote is one way they do this, and Trump, thank goodness, is shutting that down.

> Furthermore, Trump is at least trying to acquire legal grounds upon which to prosecute those responsible for rigging the 2020 election. Last month’s raid of Fulton County, Georgia’s election office, and the fact that the DOJ has sued over twenty states for refusing to hand over their 2020 election data indicate that Trump is serious. Whether he’s successful, only time will tell. However, I have some doubts that Vice President JD Vance shares Trump’s laser focus on this issue should Trump go down thanks to Epstein.

3?
> Here is a quote from JD Vance from 2016 regarding Trump. Keep in mind that Vance was in his early thirties when he said this:

< I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon who wouldn’t be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he’s America’s Hitler. How’s that for discouraging? 

> And when I asked Grok what Secretary of State Marco Rubio had to say about the 2017 Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, Grok responded with this:

< Marco Rubio, the U.S. Senator from Florida, strongly condemned the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017, describing it as involving white supremacists, Nazis, and the KKK. He characterized the violence—particularly the car attack that killed Heather Heyer—as a terror attack by white supremacists. His key public statements (primarily via Twitter at the time) included: On August 12, 2017 (as events unfolded and after President Trump’s initial “many sides” comment):
< Very important for the nation to hear @potus describe events in #Charlottesville for what they are, a terror attack by #whitesupremacists.”
< He also stated: “Nothing patriotic about #Nazis, the #KKK or #WhiteSupremacists. It’s the direct opposite of what #America seeks to be.”
< Following Trump’s later press conference (where Trump equated “both sides” and mentioned “fine people on both sides,” while clarifying he wasn’t referring to neo-Nazis/white supremacists), Rubio was more direct in criticism on August 15, 2017. In a thread, he wrote:
< “Mr. President, you can’t allow #WhiteSupremacists to share only part of blame. They support idea which cost nation & world so much pain.”
< He added that the movement is built on hatred that justifies violence, and emphasized: “No, not the same. One side is racist, bigoted, Nazi. The other opposes racism and bigotry. Morally different universes.”
< He further stated the rally organizers were “100% to blame” for promoting an “evil ideology which argues certain people are inferior because of race.” 

>Now, maybe we can have Trumpism without Trump. I dearly hope we can. Maybe Vance and Rubio have turned over a new leaf and embraced Trump’s tacit pro-whiteness and will carry the torch once he’s gone. At this point, I have no choice but to give them the benefit of the doubt. But for me that will be trading in a known for an unknown—something I would like to put off for as long as possible because I refuse to take it for granted. In the meantime, I think we should put up with Trump regardless of what has been unflushed from the Epstein files. There has been a lot of justified talk on the Right lately about never allowing the Left to gain power in this country again. Trump seems to be committed to this, which is reason enough, in my mind, to forgive a lot.

4/?
Replies: >>56118
>>56117
> My third reason is very simple. If Trump is indeed engaging in skullduggery to cover up parts of the Epstein files, then there are two possible reasons. One is that he himself is implicated in a crime serious enough to disqualify him from the presidency and perhaps invite arrest and prosecution. And two is that he wishes to keep secret some embarrassing and difficult-to-explain facts which would negatively impact his party’s chances in the next two elections. Given what I know about Trump, I’m going to roll the dice and plop for option two. Very few can rise to the level of the presidency while keeping his hands clean, and I am sure Trump is no different. Therefore, I simply do not want to hand the White House over to far-Left Democrats who will reopen the border, pack the Supreme Court, and vindictively prosecute Trump and his supporters simply because the Donald cheated on his wife with call girls or stiffed someone over a real estate deal in 2011.

> And if it turns out that Trump is indeed covering up a serious crime then I will stand corrected.

> Finally, my reason for happily supporting Trump is that my standards are happily low. Despite what the Founding Fathers may have envisioned for the United States, the multiracial conglomerate it has devolved into has become a democratic republican ethno-oligarchy. Such a system will naturally attract the venal, the narcissistic, the power hungry, and the psychopathic into positions of power. When people on the Right complain about this—as they should—I get the feeling they are harkening back to a time when the people had a wise, just, and powerful leader who loved them. Monarchy, essentially—or its modern equivalent, fascism. Now, there is nothing wrong with this, of course, except that it is tantamount to wringing water from a stone. It’s futile to ask, “Why can’t our elected officials be as moral as I am?” since in many, if not the majority, of cases their lack of morals is the reason they excel in politics to begin with. As we all know, if politicians were perfectly honest, no one would vote for them.

> If you find our current system intolerable, it would make more sense not to change it but to adopt a new one. Either we bring back organicism—which has its own set of problems and may or may not be better than what he have now—or we establish a much more racially homogenic democratic republic along the lines of what the Founding Fathers envisioned. A white ethnostate, essentially. In such a case, the shady cabals controlling the politicians would likely have less divergent interests, which would result in a stabler and healthier society—and a lot less pedophilia. In the meantime however it is best to be realistic about the system we currently have. In such a system, the most effective leaders you’re most likely going to find are those with no standards at all. Thus, they can be easily controlled through their vices by vicious people like Jeffrey Epstein and the shadowy cabal that managed him.

> Compared to these standards, Donald Trump comes out smelling like a rose.

(Courtesy of the Unz Review, the premier dissident news aggregator)
(Views expressed from the author not necessarily my own)
[New Reply]
4 replies | 1 file | 1 UID
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3