/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

>>57117 (OP) 
a jew sang it and it's being used to make fun of white people, that's why.
>still slaps

>>57117 (OP) 
They've been banning Hitler speeches? Under what possible legal precedent? Nobody owns the speeches legally, translation is legal, and doubtless there's countless copyright-free / open-source voice technologies. I understand our enemy is the jew, an adversary wicked beyond redemption and only fit for the boiling flames of their father below—I just don't see what made up legal precedent they could even use, though.

>>58192
They have “Community Guidelines”, there is no need to reference law, private platforms have their own law in the form of guidelines.

8795454.jpg
[Hide] (91.1KB, 526x537)

>>58183
>used to make fun of white people
That was in the previous paradigm and it was popular because of it, but entering into this new paradigm it gains new carry.