1760833965326270.webm
[Hide] (2.9MB, 1160x710, 00:15) My response is that the left faction essentially believes the laws do not apply to them. Vance is right about it, no kangz is yet more of the public theatrics they've been doing for the past ten years.
But let's get real about it. They have numbers in some areas. The next step is if they decide to muster a mob for violence. They also use these opportunities to create a public consensus and try and frame the narrative. It's not smart to simply sit by passively while no kangz happens for the next 3 years. The emerging demarcation lines are between two separate countries.
We should be viewing a Domestic conflict along political grounds as an inevitability at this point and be shaping our planning based on this premise. Whether that conflict will escalate is the issue to face resolution. No republican preparation could likely result in a loss. Mild preparation could result in war which is anyone's guess. By contrast, high preparation could result in a position of strength that averts such a conflict developing in the first place.
It is a question of numbers, capacity, and geography. Republicans should be aiming to win this by winning the geographic and numerical game before a first strike. I would suggest the following policies on these grounds:
1) Station multiple out-of-state divisions in California specifically and among the eastern seaboard states. This prevents the enemy from unhindered mustering which would allow them to fight
2) Immediately loyalty test and purge any disloyal officers commanding troops. This is the fault line which would create civil war conditions if unchecked
3) Create conditions for a reserve army of republican loyalists of fighting age coming from within MAGA. Republicans will need to be able to draw on multiple brigade strength entities on short notice in an emergent civil conflict, which are politically reliable.
4) Drain the strategy industrial manufacturing capacity of the Democrat states and attempt to siphon it to reliable republican ones. This is very important for creating conditions which might win the long war
5) Ensure strong contingency plans and officer loyalty within the east and west coast navies. Because otherwise hostile powers will arm the rebels
6) Condition the loyalist population internally for the possibility of domestic conflict. Otherwise they may fold when the push of the pike happens and it'll be a loss.
7) Pursue defensive fortification and hardening specifically along the lightly populated western Republican states of UT, AZ, and ID. Otherwise the event of a true civil war these regions stand to be massacred by California forces in brutal overruns
I suppose this is dramatic given the circumstances, but just briefly looking at figures for numbers for potential division muster between left/right states, it's obvious that California would present a huge problem and Republican forces would be pitted with the undesirable problem of a two-front, or even three-front war. Occupying the eastern seaboard, fighting a potential insurgency or revolt among southern blacks, and then finally fighting the real threat of California which would have had a free hand to broadly occupy and raze across the western states
I suppose this is my early C/W analysis writeup. Anyways, there is an obvious emerging civil conflict that will emerge whenever this hybrid strategy peters out