/news/ - Current News

>For the report, called “The Sex Recession,” researchers at the IFS analyzed the data on sex and intimacy in the latest General Social Survey produced by NORC at the University of Chicago, which was collected in 2024 and released in May. 

< They found that just 37 percent of people age 18-64 reported having sex at least once a week, down from 55 percent in 1990. 
<The decline is even more striking for young adults: Almost a quarter of people age 18-29, or 24 percent, said they had not had sex in the past year; this is twice as many as in 2010.
>Much has been written in recent years about the trend of young people having less sex, attributed to everything from stunted social skills to a rise in internet pornography. 
< Yet the IFS study shows that the same trend holds true for people up to the age of 64, of all sexual orientations, both married and single. 

Low rates of sex → Low rates of coupling → Low life satisfaction → Low rates of childbirth. This is actually how the death of the west could happen

b9326cbd57b3ae7050e136d70e07bb789965265f63814dd085a381cfef717925.png
[Hide] (25.3KB, 566x204) Reverse

456489536b643e504fc011115f4741399037248bbd56231bf538b16f18bfe670.jpg
[Hide] (692.9KB, 2160x2880) Reverse

4e25b6da5704894111b70290d651a2e1009638d09a1ebf304f075bb60d87acff.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1686x3000) Reverse

>>192 (OP) 
>>193
<Twitter screencap thread
<First Squawk
Oh come on, you coolie. We were just getting warmed up.

>>193
>This is actually how the death of the west could happen

That's bullshit.  The black plague killed 1/3rd to half of the population of Europe in like 6 or 8 years.  Europe survived.   It just had less people.   Why do we equate record numbers of useless eaters with success of a society?  Because the fucking jew needs them to take out loans, and buy furniture and cars, to keep the shekels flowing in.  Every Western country on earth was better 75 years ago, when we all had populations half of what we have now.  That's the truth of the matter.  

We don't need more White people, or niggers and jeets.  Just go with what we have, we'll be fine, like always. We're panicking over nothing but jew profits.

>>195
That's true, but the black death wasn't a fundamental problem with fertility. The current system shrinks it by half every generation. We could do better for the reasons you say with a smaller population, but ultimately the birth rate has to stabilize for society to stabilize

>>195
>We don't need more White people
Only part I disagree with. Europeans should always constitute the majority of the planet's demographics, as they are provably the best combination of ethical, good-looking, creative, and intelligent. Other groups such as Japanese, Hong Kong diaspora (not mainland Chinese), some groups such as the Thai, and Taiwan's refugees from the Mao era can also be encouraged to grow.

>>197
Strength in numbers.  I get that. Ideally, we probably would want to outnumber everyone else.  But it's not absolutely necessary.  We're not going to die out because the population dipped 10%.  

>>196
Fertility will probably recover when people can afford to have children again.  My grandfather on my father's side had six on a factory worker's salary.  My grandmother stayed home.  In that situation, just the husband and wife can't afford the rent in 2025.  Not to mention Western society is sick and twisted.  Right now, we're in a situation that is totally stacked against population growth.   And I doubt that's an accident.  It is this way because our leaders want it this way.  Roll the clock back to 1955, and then if we still have trouble, then we have trouble.  Rolling the clock back to 1955 is the task at hand right now, as near as I can tell.

>>198
>Strength in numbers.  I get that. Ideally, we probably would want to outnumber everyone else.  But it's not absolutely necessary.  We're not going to die out because the population dipped 10%. 
It's more than that—a world populated mostly by the best race (Europeans) will be a planet that is mostly safe, creative, intelligent, innovative, and beautiful to live in, almost everywhere. These things map to one another exactly. 

The contra is self-evident: what does any place such as Somalia, Liberia, Haiti, the United States, Zimbabwe, etc., turn into when those of the African species migrate or already dwell there? Again, by contrast, what does the place turn into when it's Europeans, even including prison colony islands or barbaric wildernesses in the heart of Africa? 

Europeans and their diaspora are 6% of the world's population: far, far fewer in numbers due to the explosion in growth of racially hostile foreign species which do immense damage to the world ecosystem, even when their intentionally hostile actions are not factored such as jeets. A Turkish-Khazar blood cult of about eighteen million has also made it their life objective to kill us 6% by all means in reach, with good results so far: Europeans in their own lands are the majority at best only because the rapidly dying and non-fertile older population make up those numbers.

We are in a racial and holy war. Quality is good, but lack of quantity damned the Germans in the 20th century. We should heed that. Numbers are very necessary.