>>3714 (OP)
>we need to make OurChan great again.
>we are also discussing this in the telegram chat.
TIRESOME.
My suggestion: stop corralling users into a fedop platform whose purpose is to hyper atomize every possible topic of discussion behind private, unsearchable, widely unarchivable chatrooms while requesting a phone number to access any of it, no doubt corralling all dissidents and their discussions into whatever glowing directory/list for easy pwning. That's not the way the internet should be. That kind of communication directly counters anything you'd be trying to accomplish on an old style IB chan.
As for telegram, sure you can use a burner but the mere fact of requiring a phone number at all should have been enough to put all of you off from ever engaging with that sort of platform, understanding that It sets a horrible president for poor opsec and blatant data collection and surveillance.
>create classic imageboard to encourage traditional net communication in the face of widespread censorship and cuckery to recreate teh epic old days
>hey let's create a telekike room, you know, one of the places that's aggressively absorbed all discourse that used to be spread healthily across the internet over many unique and public sites, thoroughly killing them, even though we're directly attempting to undo that.
Seriously, what the fuck is this and why must it happen? Every anon who's not a broccoli head knows this is gay. And I know it's not just the zoomers, bc i'm sure the staff is probably all millennial or older.
Simply posed, why use restricted, closed telegram when we have a perfectly fine open forum here? every circle jerk over there is traffic lost on OURCHAN. Willingly using the weaponized apps ((( they ))) allow us to have is akin to consenting to the take over itself. It's common knowledge that bigger IB's do the whole exclusive-tier mod/janny community circle jerk on fedgram/trooncord. why entertain that potential at all? talk to us here and transparently.
Look, I also kinda hope I'm mistaken about the magnitude of the affect of these platforms on this particular site. I don't use any of them at all so for all I know there's like 3 anons in the telegram and I'm sperging over nothing lol(moderators do need to post here though, and not scheme behind anon's backs) I don't know much about simplex but it seems to be along the same line, could a mod or a fren that knows fill us in as to how many people are in those places?
I'm quite sure I'm not wrong though. I know for a fact that frenschan had that problem, and it was deader than a pajeet's train-mangled corpse by the end times.
wait a minute, wat the fak?
>Bad request
Mime type "image/png" for "fucking_niggers.png" not allowed
>reads https://www.ourchan.org/news.html#6883bcb38f99c8440c504506
oh shit. well I can make a further suggestion while the hiatus is ongoing, touching on this point:
>"but I feel we are pandering too much to people and were not being strict enough"
YES YES and all of my YES. people like trump shills, pro porn posters, people who deny the JQ, ANYONE REMOTELY ANTI WHITE, and those spouting establishment shill talking points(as long as it's obviously done in bad faith and not just an uninitiated naive newfren) should all be banned on sight like they were on frens. I liked the banning system they had over there better overall imo(I know I know, they had their set of issues too, like often not fucking deleting the cp until it's sat for DISTURBINGLY LONG HOURS OF TIME and getting butthurt when people started to bring it up, accusing them of being terminally online no lifers "cUz wE jAnNies AnD aDmiNz HaVE LiVez aNd hAvE SeGGx UnLIke U kEk". Once, they even accused me of being a pedophile because I offered to help janny out the problem, they blundered the christo-pagan wars of May of '23 by letting agitators get their way because they screamed like a child about being banned for agitating, and kinda sometimes falling down this weird "3rd position to male feminist pipeline" I've noticed where you sometimes couldn't call out women's BS without being banned for being "anti-women" are all some of my biggest grievances, that being said, 95 percent of the other bans were entirely justified.) the ban list was the most OP feature, you could see the kind of shit that's wasn't tolerated whilst not allowing it into the discussion and providing mod transparency.
I say all that because frens had a no-nonsense fixation for pro-white causes and was a true WN website, I think that really helped drive engagement and attracted real anons. over here it seems that things are a little more laxed and casual on the political end, just drawing a line at porn, which is good. But maybe driving home the pro white cause would help. It's not like the site isn't already super based already anyways with Isn'treal and pindia rangeband. but frens just had this overall in your face advocation for our people, even encouraging flyering and safe irl activism in the banners and generals and it worked great. we're also missing the whole ctw aspect too. Another can of worms, and to be fair, it sort of died early on with frens too.
sorry/not sorry for being not so nice about it, I really care about the quality of these kinds of websites because they're a dying breed to put it mildly. We're not normieshits, were people capable of solving problems and we need a place to engage with and remoralize our people.
I know its a silver platter of BS running a chan in the current year, I respect the effort dedication and RISK it takes to do this. it's worth taking every effort to make this the best place it can be while not getting waco'd.
>>3970
>I honestly believe we might need some nsfw board like /s/ for example, just to satisfy thirst, thats the most tame type of nsfw board.
>just to satisfy thirst
THIRST???? If you mean just appreciating beautiful white women, I think you should dress it(AND HER) up more as a homage to racial appreciation or the epitome of feminine quality other than a way that just outright conveys sandnigger-tier lust.