/meta/ - Suggestions

Feedback for the team


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


1728065354431444.png
[Hide] (243.9KB, 640x669)
What do you want added to the site, anon? What do you want changed?
I'm making a kanban of issues that need to be fixed/changed on the site. So far I have:
>Make post formatting not suck
>Add infinity scroll/multi page overboard (per >>239)
What else do you anons want? Don't be afraid to request anything here. If it's reasonable it'll get done.
Replies: >>367 >>477
Technically it's good. Has a stable enough userbase and some good seed threads and discussion topics.

My feedback:
>The captcha is very slow and crashes frequently on tor. That is a huge problem.
>I would like it if the site started trying to curtail funposting. Something fairly harmless, like the mods can flag an especially shitty post as "glowie", and then users can't quote respond to it directly, maybe it turning neon as well. 
>We need more users. About double what we have now.
>please don't let some shitty powermod into moderation who will start ripping the insides of this site out. We only really need to ban CP, criminal incitement, and very serious funposting topics. Imageboards are powered by disagreements
whoops.jpg
[Hide] (184.5KB, 1024x1024)
>>362 (OP) 
>An .onion link
>A Captcha system that doesn't require JavaScript. Javascript is Tor's Achilles heel.
Y'all glowies did the same shit with frenschan. Also that was cute with streaming videos. Good way to dox frens.
>A chat system that isn't Telegram so I can chat with you people. IRC, XMPP, Cwtch group, Simplex chat.

If these things don't happen I'll dox you all showing tru-frens y'all are actually glowies. 

Shouldn't have got those DEI hires to do your millipede 461 certifications kek.

Keep fucking around and it's going to be worse than Snowden, I assure you.

But seriously just do those few things and we're all cool. Just don't fuck with me next time I'm in a bar. 

-Ghadaffi's Ghost
Replies: >>368 >>370
1606411200912.jpg
[Hide] (38KB, 720x813)
>>367
.....
qrd? why namefagging?
>pic is me
>>367
I agree with all of this. The funposting tolerance in particular will inevitably kill the site when feds start knocking. Guess what? If you don't have over your server keys to our people you are getting vanned. And yes, they do test those limits on chans themselves rather than wait for other people to do it.
Replies: >>374
fds.jpg
[Hide] (177.7KB, 1280x768)
>>370
Are you an ESL Pajeet or just a typical illiterate American? I'm not really sure what you're saying, but I know one thing for sure, you also have no idea what you're saying nor are you forming any coherent threats. But if you are in fact threatening me, should I go ahead with the Snowden ala Guardian route? Or more incendiary and less creative routes? Double check with your Commanding Officer if this is the best course of action for the DoD at this moment. You wouldn't want to accidentally start World War III because of a misunderstanding in a chan post, Pvt. Kumar.
1611835573259.jpg
[Hide] (281.5KB, 1024x1024)
Hey there Fren.
I just wanted to float this out there.
I have started a few threads here,(more than all other chans combined actually,) and was wondering if there's some kind of mechanism for being able to EDIT OP posts with a password.
I do try to proofread thoroughly before posting, but I'll occasionally misspell a word or leave out a link or pic, only to realize the fact After posting.
Sure, It's on me--My retardation, but I suppose I've gotten spoiled on other platforms being able to edit.
Replies: >>475 >>482
>>473
this would be very handy. I make so many typos on this site it's downright embarrassing
>>362 (OP) 
Turn on this anons range ban of glowies
https://ourchan.org/pol/thread/1127.html#2658
>>473
I'm not the dev, but I've thought about edit features on imageboards before and how that would work, and the worst thing about them is they would be open to abuse. People can use bait and switch tactics to change thread topics. That's bad even if limited to text.

Here's how it can be implemented reasonably:
All posts are set in stone, but edits can be appended as normal posts somewhere in the thread and when hovering your cursor over the post it would give a visual diff of the edit and the original post. Edit replies could also appear separately from normal replies when you look at the part of a post which shows who replied.

This isn't terribly different from how people post spelling corrections now, but giving special features related to editing is convenient. No matter what, posts and especially OPs cannot actually be changed because of how easily that's abused. The only option which can be allowed when you truly fuck up beyond minor typos is self-deletion of a post.
[New Reply]
9 replies | 5 files | 10 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3