>>1480
>also this .gif business is a fuckton of work compared to images
no lie there.
I've looked for something that was easier, and as a strict Open Source adherent, This:
https://www.screentogif.com/
looks promising.
As I mentioned before the Accidental DELET (Iz Okay, Mods I unnerstann--You guys are doing good work, and The! BULGARIAN! Is truly the perfect weapon for deployment here, regardless if he pines for a sloppy Bucktoothed BJ by Lujan--I KID you, Jackal, Is only JOKES!)
>had to duplicate every frame basically and combine them to create a new "frame by frame"
Yup... I don't bother naming the frames though, but most of my stuff has hidden comments, either in the Meta, or in the work itself,(easy to see if opened in an OS picture viewer program like Windows live photo gallery or digiKam)
I won't do it tonight, but when I download and test the above .gif maker, I'll report back.
I just know it's gonna feel like cheating if it a lot quicker though.
I only ever RAEPed good foods, ,(or at least valiant attempts on complex recipes.)