/hell/ - Hell

>>21982
Open the Talmud. Read it. Come back after that.

>>21982
No. Under no circumstances, can a jew be trusted or utilized. It is only after they are long dead and their biographical details are assessed by historians that can they be relied upon as trustworthy sources. They're dead: there is no further possibility they can change sides and any past of subversion will have already come to light.

The only jews I have an ounce of trust in are crypto-jews that don't even know they're jewish, have been attacked and assaulted their entire lives under the identity of being thought of as White, gained zero benefit to their jewish heritage, lost a great deal for everyone thinking they're ethnically European, and have lived most or all of their life against jews especially after discovering their ethnic identity as jews or having partial jewish make-up.

We've tried this 110 times or over 1,100+ times if you count city-states, over thousands of years. The cost of allowing in a false positive (a jew we think is one of the good ones) is far too dire. Even the false negatives (actual good jews) must go, if that is the price to be paid to get rid of all of them permanently. There are no more options left. This is real now.

>Can Jews be our allies? 
No

>>21982
Shalom Moshe Shekelberg

>>21982
time for you to do some more research into the JQ,
and your also sentenced to 2 months of lurking for this shitty thread.

c566e5a6a27cd64d207361210e1e5353a862f2c84d216b454e3e77e246dcf327.png
[Hide] (992.6KB, 1006x625) Reverse

>>21982
>Can Jews be our allies


Is this the christ golems final form? Are you going to suggest we pick their grapes next?

https://youtu.be/892r3vjXgXk

>>21983
Open the Torah aka Old testament  Read it. Come back after that


>Then God said to Abraham, “As for you, you must keep my covenant, you and your descendants after you for the generations to come.  This is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the covenant you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised.  You are to undergo circumcision, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and you.  For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised, including those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner—those who are not your offspring.  Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be circumcised. My covenant in your flesh is to be an everlasting covenant.  Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant.”

 Gensis 17:9


Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.  That very same day Abraham was circumcised, and his son Ishmael; 

Genesis 17:24 


>All the men who went out of the city gate agreed with Hamor and his son Shechem, and every male in the city was circumcised. Three days later, while all of them were still in pain, two of Jacob’s sons, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and attacked the unsuspecting city, killing every male.

Genesis 34:24


>And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised

Leviticus 12:3


>At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met Moses and was about to kill him.  But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin and touched Moses’ feet with it. “Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me,” she said.  So the Lord let him alone. (At that time she said “bridegroom of blood,” referring to circumcision.)

exodus 4:24

>David took his men with him and went out and killed two hundred Philistines and brought back their foreskins. They counted out the full number to the king so that David might become the king’s son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.

1 Samuel 18:27


>And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at the hill of the foreskins

Joshua 5:3




>You are filled with shame instead of glory. You also—drink! And be exposed as uncircumcised! The cup of the LORD’s right hand will be turned against you, And utter shame will be on your glory.

Habakkuk 2:16

>>21982
Impossible. Their very religion inspires in group fatalistic nepotism at the cost of all those around them, and they are encouraged to make it so.
They hide behind their religion when they know full well what they do is in poor moral taste.
Not according to god, if you were to ask a jew.

And should a jew go overboard even against his god?
Then he'll just slap a chicken to death and transfer his sins, once a year.

>>21996
To be clear, just because I criticize the Christians doesn't mean that I accept you pagan faggots as being legitimate. Tell me, what is gained by attacking white Christians?

Marvel movies are not real. Thor is not a real thing you can just "will" into existence because you're a pothead who would like to pretend to be spiritually enlightened rather than control his vices.

>>22017
>Veggie tales are not real. Magic flying Jews who walk on water is not a real thing you can just "will" into existence because you're a pothead who would like to pretend to be spiritually enlightened rather than control his vices.

>>22017
Why did you assume I'm a pagan . Also what if I am a Hellenistic pagan? What you assume all polytheist are Thor worshipers? You really need to broaden your horizons . Also Jesus was a Jew.




 After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem  and asked, “Where is the one who has been born ((( king of the Jews? ))) We saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”

 Mathew 2:2



 And when eight days were completed for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.

Luke 2:21


When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?” (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.)
The Samaritan woman said to him, ((( “You are a Jew ))) and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?”For Jews do not associate with Samaritans

John 4:7


Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, “Surely you don’t mean me, Rabbi?” Jesus answered, “You have said so.

Matthew 26:25

Going at once to Jesus, Judas said, “Greetings, Rabbi!” and kissed him.

Matthew 26:49


Peter said to Jesus, “Rabbi, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters—one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah.”

Mark 9:5


“What do you want me to do for you?” Jesus asked him. The blind man said, “Rabbi, I want to see.”

Mark 10:51


"And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and he stood up to read."

LUKE 4:16



"Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It read, 'Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.'"

John 19:19


"Circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee."

Philippians 3:5


But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

 Romans 2:29

>>22039
>Jesus was a jew
In modern language, we'd say he was a hebrew. The jews of today have literally 0 connection to the jews of antiquity and only adopted that label in the 1800s.

>>22040
>The jews of today have literally 0 connection to the jews of antiquity
No, they have native Levantine ancestry. It's just that they're mixed with Europeans now. The Levantine ancestry can be as low as 1/3. If you wanted to learn about this, it just takes a few minutes. I would download G25 and load it up in Vahaduo if I had questions about Jewish origins. It's objective.

1597343954196.jpg
[Hide] (34.5KB, 483x470) Reverse

>>21982
There's over 2000 years of evidence that jews are not to be trusted no matter what.

>>22041
>No, they have native Levantine ancestry.
No, they don't.Genetic studies on Jews have found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among ((( Ashkenazi ))) Jews. Behar and others concluded such a link was unlikely, noting a lack of clear modern descendants of the Khazars, but found no genetic markers in ((( Ashkenazi ))) that would link them to peoples of the Caucasus/Khazar area.[6] This and other studies have instead found evidence that the ((( Ashkenazi ))) have mixed Near Eastern and Southern European/Mediterranean origins.[8][6][9]

>It is the largest genomic study ever carried out on ((( Ashkenazi ))) Jews, and shows that most of today’s population are the descendants of Greeks, Iranians and others who colonised what is now northern Turkey more than 2,000 years ago.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-350-people-study-finds/
>https://www.google.com/amp/s/api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/history/article/dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews

>It's objective
Says who?

>>22041
That genepool is almost non existant, a very large majority of them are heavily mixed with arab, turk and european blood.

>>22044
The vast majority of people you'd call jews today are edomites. They know it, and if you call a jew an edomite they will flip the fuck out and start deflecting. That we're even having this discussion is ludicrous, per >>22042. If a jew tells you the sky is blue, it's probably nighttime.

>>22043
>No, they don't.Genetic studies on Jews have found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among (((  Ashkenazi  ))) Jews.
Do you even understand what I just said? Please learn what words mean before you speak

>>22047
I accept your concession.

>>22048
I understand that you're clueless. No need to be proud about it. Now take a step back and think for a second. I mentioned Levantine ancestry, and out of left field you came back with a copy paste job about Khazars. There's no excuse for this. Own up to your ignorance and learn what these words mean before you post.

>>22049
You're very good at being condescending, but lacking in saying something of substance. You either treat me with respect and have a discussion, or you've conceded. Simple as that. There is no third option here.

>>1781
You have several problems:
1. You don't know what Levantine means
2. You don't know what Khazar means. (Apparently you think Levantine and Khazar are equivalent)
3. You don't know what Canaanite means. Newsflash: a study on genetics does not use Biblical terminology. In a scientific context "Canaanite" means ancient native Levantine no different from "Biblical Jews", so in effect the study is trying to say Jews are native to Israel in some way. That study is really old and the methods are trash by the way. Modern methods expose Jews for being mutts who are not native to Israel in that their Levantine ancestry can be quite low compared to their European ancestry

>>1782
Khazar - edomite kike gypsy
Levantine - from the levant
Canaanite - similar to levantine

>That study is old
And?
>Methods are trash
Based on what?

Before you were arguing that jews had levantine ancestry, now you're arguing the opposite.

>>1783
>now you're arguing the opposite.
I'm not. I'm just explaining to you that the news coverage of it is just a Zionist propaganda piece and the study is outdated garbage that probably had biased intentions behind it anyway. Give me a few minutes while I try to make pic from Vahaduo for you.

>>1784
You are. Previously, here: >>1773 you responded to "The jews of today have literally 0 connection to the jews of antiquity" with "No, they have native Levantine ancestry."

Now, you say "Modern methods expose Jews for being mutts who are not native to Israel in that their Levantine ancestry can be quite low compared to their European ancestry." You completely flipped 180*. You're lying.

>>1785
My position from the beginning is that their Levantine ancestry is low, not that they don't have any. Are you an idiot?

Ashkenazi_Jews_-_attempt_1.png
[Hide] (36.1KB, 1109x561) Reverse

>>1785
All right, here's an example of their ancestral components. There are other ways to do this, but this is what I figured out within 5 min.
Israel_IA = Israel Iron Age = native Levantine ancestry

>>1786
This conversation went like this:
>Me: The modern "jew" has no connection to the jew of old
>You: No, they have native Levantine ancestry... it can be AS LOW AS 1/3
Some time passes, then you said:
>Modern methods expose Jews for being mutts who are not native to Israel in that their Levantine ancestry can be quite low compared to their European ancestry
That's a complete 180. You went from "No, the supposed "jews" of today are the jews of old" to "No, the "jews" of today are mutts who have little ocnnection to the levantine

You flipped. It's there in black and white, plain as day. 
>>1787
I literally don't care what a resource says unless it agrees with what I know to be true - jews 2000 years ago have 0 connection to the "jews" of today, which are mutts that adoped a label to manipulate europeans.

>>1788
The concept I am trying to convey to you is they have ancestry which is native to Israel (25-30%) but they themselves are not native to Israel because these mutts were created in Europe. Understand?
Question: Is a mulatto native to Sub-Saharan Africa? (My answer would be no)

>>1789
>But their ancestry
Literally doesn't matter to the point you're making. I said the edomites today are not the jews of old, which should be called hebrew, that they have no connection. You agree with my overall point but are nitpicking on some weird genetics point that is ultimately irrelevant.

Ashkenazi_Jews_-_Attempt_2.png
[Hide] (53.4KB, 1109x683) Reverse

>>1790
For reference, the closest things in existence to original Israelites are Samaritans and Palestinians.

"Edomite" is a fantasy race like elves. Ancestry is no longer a black box. It can be treated analytically.

>>1791
>Edomite
That would be the modern jews, yes. I legitimately wonder if you're a jew with how dedicated you are to nitpicking. I already told you I don't care about your distractions.

>>1792
The point I am getting to by explaining these things in detail is that the non-European essence of Jews is no different from "Biblical Jews." Biblical Jews were awful people with morally abhorrent teachings such as involuntary genital mutilation of infants. They had very little in common with the European character. Basically, they were ooga booga sandniggers.

>>1793
It is different, because they're not biblical jews. "But they cut babies dicks!" So do americans, that doesn't make them biblical jews. It's important to attack the jews on the grounds that they are NOT what they claim to be.

>>1794
>So do americans, that doesn't make them biblical jews.
Correct, it makes Americans awful people just like Biblical Jews were.

The only thing that matters is opposing Jews when they move against the existence of white people (which is all the time). Semitic fairytales are irrelevant lies that just waste everyone's time

>>1795
What does circumcision have to do  with any of this?
>Semitic fairytales
Oh, now your perspective makes sense.

Ashkenazi_Jews_-_Italy_Imperial.png
[Hide] (50.8KB, 1109x672) Reverse

Here's a funny model. When you throw in Italy_Imperial it eats up most of the Israel_IA ancestry. This is probably because Italy_Imperial includes a lot of non-IA-European ancestry. Italy had many "east Med" immigrants (Syrians, Jews, stuff like that)

Ashkenazi_Jews_-_Attempt_3.png
[Hide] (51.8KB, 1109x658) Reverse

All right, it's a little complicated but the distances are pretty low for everybody. Israel_IA + Israel_Natufian = Israelite %

Jews have a lot of Mycenaean Greek ancestry.

>>1798
What point do you think you're making here?

Ashkenazi_Jews_-_Attempt_4.png
[Hide] (54.9KB, 1109x658) Reverse

>>1799
I'm just experimenting for fun. Here's another. Some might say it's overfitting but it's curious how the Natufian disappeared.

>>1800
Have fun fren. I'm dipping out. Good luck and God bless even if I disagree with you.

e6846413b9d2dbf1cd2de7d469eee8f2a928ea8aecb88f7c6ed4739faf384782.jpeg
[Hide] (244.6KB, 1920x1200) Reverse

>>1774
Yeah the Polytheistic pre Chrtian Greeks and Romans new this.

Judaea Contra Rome, Rome Contra Judaea


https://www.bitchute.com/video/kL8OnNrs4W3p/

I'm not a mod, but a gentle reminder that besides the pro-kike opening, this thread is littered with word-for-word with copypasta diversion posts found on 4chins. 
>>1766
>>1767
>>1771
We saw this very tactic employed on FC, elsewhere, and very obviously on 4fags. All fields.

>>1803
Yes, it just screams D&C.

>>1760 (OP) 
soyjack wiki has a nice page dedicated to jews go there and the answer will reveal itself