>664
Interesting idea, I wonder if there's something like this that could be used beyond showing proof to people you physically meet with. The problem is that a "verified non-AI content" detector was made it's only a matter of time before AI advances to the point where it can pass the detection test successfully, and if such a tool gets released it would likely accelerate such an advancement. Will some hypothetical dissidentAI used for entrapment and deradicalization purposes be able to say "nigger?"
>better to just form antifragile parallel communities, develop an anti-AI religion to help guide the normies, and destroy civilization.
>problem is that civilization itself is too decentralized even in a globalized world, and waiting for a highly centralized one-world government to take over that can then be sabotaged at a single point of failure and quickly overthrown is not particularly appetizing since they have already damaged our genomes to the point many of us will die prematurely from cancer and other illnesses whether we've been mRNA'd or not.
The window of opportunity for resistance against AI and the ever-evolving surveillance state is quite narrow. That being said, I could be barking up the wrong tree and need to review Uncle Ted's (PBUH) works again for some insight.