Reply on a separate page (no auto-refresh)
Uh, wonderland bros?
>>275 (OP)
>>276 tfw went through the looking glass
>>276 >Use your own hardware with open source software >Dod btfo lmao
Dystopian.. already knew you could technically intercept TOR nodes but didnt know it was already happening + vulterabilities
>>275 (OP) Source?
>>280 Found it hosted on wikispooks. They do talk about having an open source router behind the the malware one to stop the packet attacks. like 278 is saying.
>>283 The inbound defense is pretty solid but I'm not sold on the outgoing one since they should be able to beat vpn cryption There have been a couple of known exploits where they install kekloggers on your computer before the onion ever even goes up, which would be made possible if they always had a undisclosed hole into the networks of all the proles. This was supposedly found by UK IT people reverse engineering their router
>>285 >Defense. What you're showing is not good enough for defense. Look to this thread and the concept of Red Black engineering: https://ourchan.org/g/thread/129.html#130 Also many docsis routers from ISP are now combined. So it would be impossible to put a router in front of the ISP router for many people. So Red black concept is your fren, picrel ironically NSA for siprnet fun at for embassy staff worldwide. Don't forget about TEMPEST! also covered in the thread.
>>288 I am so tempted to buy an aluminum cucktent. The doc I'm sharing is rather old