Where is the Exit Wound and other Mysteries of the Charlie Kirk murder

Where is the Exit Wound and other Mysteries of the Charlie Kirk murder Anon 17/09/2025, 19:40:49 7e20a1 No.5342

HideWatch

1609876936301.jpg
[Hide] (22.7KB, 474x380) Reverse

1). If the path of the bullet went from the front of Charlie Kirk (CK) to the back, then where is the exit wound? None currently exists in the footage available.

2). If CK was shot directly in the neck from the front to the back, how come the T-shirt collar suddenly moves upward significantly?

3). If CK was shot from the front to the back with a .30-06, where is the resulting bullet hole in the back of the tent? A .30-06 would have gone straight through a neck.

These questions are not going away and every time CK "stans" and MAGAtards try to dismiss them, they and other questions surrounding this murder will only grow louder.

Replies: >>5344 >>5349

Anon 17/09/2025, 19:42:16 597155 No.5343

I posted a stupid statement, so it must be true.

Anon 18/09/2025, 05:19:19 4db4ca No.5344

>>5342 (OP) 
To me it looked like the bullet was traveling diagonally from CK’s 1 o’clock to the ten o’clock. Essentially cutting across the arteries and not really entering his neck.

Anon 18/09/2025, 09:29:41 6290a4 No.5349

>>5342 (OP) 
>2). If CK was shot directly in the neck from the front to the back, how come the T-shirt collar suddenly moves upward significantly?

the general consensus seems to be that the bullet ricocheted off of his body armour and into his neck

Replies: >>5350

Anon 18/09/2025, 10:03:58 439520 No.5350

>>5349
I'm not deep into the CK lore, but that's not really how the physics of that would work.
Pistol rounds don't ricochet off of soft armor (they are caught), and rifle rounds pretty much ignore soft armor entirely. Also, he doesn't look like he was wearing a soft armor vest to me, but I won't rule it out. 
You'd typically need steel plates to cause ricochets (which you're not going to conceal under a tshirt), but that would require a very shallow angle and you would see a ton of spalling.

So whoever made that concensus is malicious or deeply uninformed.

Replies: >>5353

Anon 18/09/2025, 14:57:08 52f316 No.5353

>>5350
The people who invented the theory are malicious, and the ones spreading it are idiots. From What I can tell

Replies: >>5358

Anon 18/09/2025, 17:57:06 589747 No.5358

>>5353
Many such cases.

/bant/ - International/Random

For any discusions

Actions:

Captcha: