New Reply[×]
Name
Sage
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files47.7MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


c269612be0f5bfc98c575bab29334338700234d1689ad376e13c998484be9c8e.png
[Hide] (42.8KB, 799x351) Reverse
Do you guys think that governments around the western world do this as a control tactic on critical populations they otherwise cannot legally control the speech and behavior of?
f1f3466936a3989f1f7aafc5dec1c2e51223007126451a67bb4a4e66342da78d.png
[Hide] (52.6KB, 738x410) Reverse
and of course here is how the attack is executed
ae6477b68e643faef42be6077c4b6400ff40a3c40fd4c625f3ddc00b99732677.png
[Hide] (43.4KB, 678x376) Reverse
And of course, the follow through.

"these things simply don't happen in civilized countries". Right
Replies: >>6227
bf3e6d803e29d3c5c89909e0f8ad2e58af1f37e4d1b76de8e8c97d1e8ebe0d17.png
[Hide] (36.3KB, 570x307) Reverse
>>6225
4bc9b6b7d64b20f21e207451aebe3248d3ffb4243138ad4929953686ccb9ac12.png
[Hide] (54.6KB, 552x456) Reverse
Replies: >>6229
a9a34362a43769627dac101a8dfb7c237828f4985b290fa528a2f2859ecb7f23.png
[Hide] (55.3KB, 594x442) Reverse
>>6228
It's amazing how textbook some of these methods are actually
6a0ed567436782ce26d08c90756e131009bbfb03dd8eb9fb75d69fecbe0eca4b.png
[Hide] (302.7KB, 544x463) Reverse
>By manufacturing pretexts (“security threat,” “public interest,” “extremist content”), retroactively criminalizing behavior, and co‑opting legal and media mechanisms, a government can transform an outright illegal blackmail campaign into a quasi‑legitimate operation. The initial coercion thus becomes a catalyst for broader, institutionally sanctioned encroachments on civil liberties.

I've actually seen this story before, the Canadian government did it just last year against Laureen Southern. I think they were using the Australians at some point if memory serves
313e697e2680882f8e908716f9d9777b82156c9332eb2abce26fbff22a9919df.png
[Hide] (69KB, 683x468) Reverse
37c49e851834335f63848f66fd29477d4eb1fede2cbf4c666179f76a47d05da2.png
[Hide] (64.4KB, 668x476) Reverse
Damn, so you mean the government manufactures stories and pretexts spuriously, to uses investigations and similar processes to punish dissidents, on the actual grounds of controlling their speech while claiming that they are merely acting in the interests of some higher calling? And this has repeatedly happened in Canada?
> CSIS’s (CSE's) charter includes “protecting Canada’s security interests,” which is deliberately vague and can be interpreted to cover political dissent.

we had a number of laws passed under the aegis of public safety, which essentially give these agencies an unanswerable blank cheque if they can make the argument. And the government right now is fishing around for low hanging fruit to set up for a big press story sponsoring the government line. It's embarrassing when you start to know how they behave
[New Reply]
9 replies | 9 files | 1 UID
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq - contact -
- telegram - simplex - irc -
jschan 1.7.3