/bant/ - International/Random

can you explain why Hierarchy is bad or not in some ways inevitable

>>54275
Why explain when you already live in a world of hierarchy? It surrounds you...envelops you...you submit to its rules without even trying to resist...accepting everything as given, as natural...as unshakable...Why should I try to explain when I've been doing so for almost five months on this forum without result?

The non-hierarch would be better off slamming the degenerate hierarch's stupid head against the wall, taking the resources and living happily without the threat of being eaten by the fucking pyramid... The perfect recipe for autonomy.

All this persuasion and endless talk leads to nothing...only action matters.

Animals understand only the language of action.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (83KB, 250x194) Reverse

>>54271
>Those who stand in the Non-Hierarch's way to resources will be swept away. We will be outside the system, there will be few of us, but we will be equal to the millions of you swarming "Zerg" scum.

>>54275
As a general rule, the scum always rises to the top of any hierarchy.  Climbers are always the worst people in any society.  They move up for more money and power.  And the money and power accumulates at the top, which attracts the criminals and psychopaths.  Anybody who actually wants to be at the top, is the last person you'd ever want to put there.   I'd rather see a reverse hierarchy.  Search for the guy least interested in being at the top, put a gun to his head and force him up there.   The result would be better.

>>5864
The point of slide threads is to distract us to and make us quibble about meaningless matters while the important subjects are neglected. And it's always low-effort schizo ramblings or AI-assisted shitposts.