/bant/ - International/Random

54e1186d84c6e80f23957ae8b6d2cb7a0978e491cf03294ef0680c746eb690f9.jpg
[Hide] (45.2KB, 1080x1243) Reverse

>As immigration from the united States and - most conspicuously - from china began to increase, fears about British ethnic sovereignty grew Giving large chunks of land to non-English-speaking colonies was becoming a less acceptable prospect to many people.

We had an official Whites only immigration policy into the 1950's.  The, "conservative," Diefenbaker government scrapped it.  One of the first bitch members of parliament was Immigration Minister at the time.  Nobody should be surprised about that.  The policy was carried on unofficially into the 1990's, with a few exceptions.  Some English speaking immigrants from Commonwealth countries like Jamaica and India were allowed in the 80's.  The nigger and jeet flood didn't start until John Chrétien kicked the doors wide open to any turban head, rat eater, or cannibal nigger in 1992.

>>5765
Exactly. The history of canada has been rewritten to present a pack of lies and distort our own history. This country was founded on the premise of being an anglo-saxon homeland and made conscious efforts to keep it that way. During the first wave of globalism racism was rampant, race riots happened, the working class strenuously objective to the foreign scabs and the government was brought in to stop the invasion. It's the reason why many historic chinatowns burnt to the ground

Nu canada is a disgusting halfway house, an abomination with no future and now history serving only to transfer the country away from it's original inhabitants to a new foreign elite and labor class which displaces the original. We should stop calling it Canada at all, because there is no resemblance to the country that it was under this farce

>>5770
Canada was never some jeet, nigger, and chink friendly melting pot of multicultural brotherhood, until very recent times.  But you're absolutely right, it is presented that way through careful omission of facts.  Yes, we did take some fugitive nigger slaves from the US in the pre-Civil War days.  But considering slavery had been outlawed in the British empire, it might not even have been legal at the time to return slaves to their owners.  Even if it was legal, most would have considered it morally reprehensible.  It just was not going to be done.  Even when I was a kid in the 70's and 80's immigrants from Hungary and Ukraine were considered undesirables to an extent.  We used to call them foreigners.  Nobody would have imagined this country would one day be full of jeets, camel jockeys, and niggers.  It was unimaginable. 

I've said this before, Canada was so White in the 1980's, I literally never met a nigger, live and in person, until I was 13 years old.  The only niggers Canadians ever saw, were on American TV.  And at the time, I lived in a city that had a fairly sizeable population of descendants of freed slaves.  And come to think of it, I never met a slant until I was in high school.  I'm sure they were here already, some small number of them, but I never met one.  Imagine sitting in a class with 26 other White kids. I don't have to imagine it, I did it.

>>5786
>Even when I was a kid in the 70's and 80's immigrants from Hungary and Ukraine were considered undesirables to an extent.

ditto in the US.  polack jokes were the norm back then - slavs have always been undesirables.  it's ironic with the recent surge in white nationalism that "white" eastern europeans will be welcomed into a future ethnostate