/b/ - Random

1. Look at 4cuck /b/. It's basically all porn now and has been for years. If you allow porn on a free-for-all board, it will just become another porn board, especially since shills and discord troons will use it as the perfect excuse to derail any and all discussion.
2. Smaller chans and forums struggle with CP, since both actual pedos and bad actors try to flood them with it; in the former case because pedos are a lot like trannies in that they just can't help but spread their filth, in the latter case to shut down discussion that isn't being controlled by them. Allowing porn would allow both of these groups to try and test the waters by posting shit that is on the border/ambiguous in order to gradually conquer the forum by constantly shifting the "overton window" of allowable content.
3. Porn is degenerate. If you want to watch it, there are plenty of sites that host it. Not every site has to allow it and, for the reasons outlined above, in many cases it's healthier not to allow it.

>>14102
Everything this anon said. You have plenty of places which are better at hosting porn and have the userbase to accommodate your cravings. There is zero point in this place wasting discussion space and resources for it. Even places such as Endchan which have strictly non-degenerate nude and erotica dumps of European women exclusively are a better option for it. Your accusations of puritanism, appeals to the early Internet, and more are absurd besides: laws have changed (nude teens use to be posted everywhere and nobody batted an eye because it wasn't yet turned into a legal weapon to shut down sites / no one cared culturally) and the Internet's demographics / technological infrastructure have changed (low IQ nons and normies are the majority of users now, so filters and regional country IP blocks are necessary to stem the brown tide).

Anarcho_Capitalism-xwn20e.jpg
[Hide] (116.4KB, 715x715)

>>14102
>Look at 4cuck /b/. 

no i wont, that's why i'm here. fuck that place, it is infested by the worst scum on the earth: government people, soldiers, 3-letter agency employees, torturers, prisonguards, zionists, billionaire mafia employees. those are the worst people in the world and it is always obvious what they have to say, every single word they type you don't have to bother to read because i can just sumarize it for you here:
"more slavery, more war, more violence, more surveilance, more profit for my boss, less for everyone else, fuck the peasants, the weak should fear the strong"

...so i don't go there.


>It's basically all porn

it is a complete fabrication of the lowest parts of your mind that porn is either NOTHING BUT PORN or no porn at all. so with everything you can discern but not with porn? bullshit, weak argument.

so when someone spams you but it is porn you will not be able to understand that it is spam because your dick gets hard? i know a lot of anti-porn people like to pretend that porn has this strong of an effect but the effect is way more mild then you would like to pretend. it is just pleasant to the male eye, which i guess you don't give a fuck about.

>Smaller chans and forums struggle with CP
yes, please wake up. it is a digital weapon by cyberarmies used against small sites to force them to submit. the same people who upload the cp are the people who will raid you with their swat teams. it is just violence theater.

>for the reasons outlined above, in many cases it's healthier not to allow it.
no you did not outline the reasons, you pasted a bunch of weak slop that somewhat relates to the topic but doesn't really hit the spot. women contribute very little to this world and you want to deny the one thing they do that can bring a smile to a man's face because other sites struggle with cp. 

>Porn is degenerate.
maybe the porn you watch...

>If you want to watch it, there are plenty of sites that host it
it is not about that. it is about restoring free speech online and stop limiting human expression because you are scared of the rapists from the secret agencies. there is no escape from the negative impact of the secret government agencies, they will negative your life no matter how you behave. they don't treat you better because you do what they want you to do, they will torture you anyways however they can because they are low scum sadists who are being nudged into believing that hurting people makes the world better. they believe in punishment and they will punish you no matter what. there is no escaping the destructive evil violence of the government people. they are here to hurt you. don't do what they say.

>>14103
>. You have plenty of places which are better at hosting porn and have the userbase to accommodate your cravings

you don't get it. it isn't about accomodating anyone's cravings or replacing pornhub. it is about stop complying with the violent psychopaths who want to regulate what people can do online and are on a warpath against men.

weak arguments all over both of your posts, clearly the mrna is working on you.

>>14109
I want no porn here. Go somewhere else .Whole tread I see, posters desperately wanting porn posted here.
        The board quality is decent, watch it nosedive otherwise. If we listen to these coomers.
 >>14108

>>14108
<no you did not outline the reasons, you pasted a bunch of weak slop that somewhat relates to the topic but doesn't really hit the spot. women contribute very little to this world and you want to deny the one thing they do that can bring a smile to a man's face because other sites struggle with cp. 
You can post nudity here, with a spoiler, within reason. I've seen it posted without a spoiler if done clearly for artistic reasons.

>fuck that place, it is infested by the worst scum on the earth: government people, soldiers, 3-letter agency employees, torturers, prisonguards, zionists, billionaire mafia employees. those are the worst people in the world and it is always obvious what they have to say, every single word they type you don't have to bother to read because i can just sumarize it for you here:
"more slavery, more war, more violence, more surveilance, more profit for my boss, less for everyone else, fuck the peasants, the weak should fear the strong"
You fail at your own reasoning: /b/, /s/, /gif/, etc. allows all the 'freedom of speech' porn you'd ever want at 4chan or other boards you clearly admitted are controlled operations, yet the actual topics and material covered here get you banned over there. Why do you think that is? With one mouth, you claim it's a monitored glownigger hive-den only offering poison, then seem surprised this place isn't keen to host poison. To make your argument even more amusing, most of the anons here don't want it for non-puritanical reasons.

>>14108
>>Look at 4cuck /b/. 
>no i wont
That was obviously a figure of speech, I did not mean you should literally go there. Though, now that I think about it, maybe it would not be such a bad idea, just so you see what that site has become.

>it is a complete fabrication of the lowest parts of your mind that porn is either NOTHING BUT PORN or no porn at all.
Projection. My point was that allowing porn is opening a gateway to shitting up the site, since it's the perfect tool to derail serious conversation.

>>Smaller chans and forums struggle with CP
>yes, please wake up. it is a digital weapon by cyberarmies used against small sites to force them to submit.
So you recognize this and yet you refuse to acknowledge the point I made.

>>Porn is degenerate.
>maybe the porn you watch...
All pornography is. It is spiritually vain and materialistic. It binds you to the material world and its vices. And, above all, it makes you lust after other women if you are married while somewhat satiating your desire to find a real wife if you don't have anyone. It is no cohencidence that most of the people in charge of pornography are jews.

>it is about restoring free speech online and stop limiting human expression
Look what free-speech-fagging has brought us: a majority of expressly left-wing sites which only allow leftoid opinions and a small minority of "right-wing" sites which allow trannies and glowniggers to derail conversation with pilpul and sophistry, if not just outright raid said sites and push their opinion through outright sheer numbers. Freedom of speech is desirable as a general freedom and on large, public forum sites, but if we don't have our own sites where we don't allow discord troons to raid and concern troll, we just end up having an open border policy and end up flooded with not niggers but trannies and pedos (which is arguably worse).

>there is no escape from the negative impact of the secret government agencies, they will negative your life no matter how you behave. 
You sound like a fed, trying to scare everyone of how the mighty three-letter agencies already are omnipotent so you should totally just allow them to spam your boards full of porn, goyim.

>>14101 (OP) 
porn leads to weird community things. Like gay men posting ero or loli or whatever just to troll the userbase. I don't think we need it here

>freespeach
This is peak degeneracy

stay_trapped.jpg
[Hide] (39.3KB, 460x460)

>>14110
>I want no porn here. 
that's at least somewhat of a more respectable reason but you are wrong for not wanting it just because you fear it will make you non-compliant towards your government and capital overlords. who cares what your owners thing, human ownership is wrong and you are supposed to oppose it both in thought and deed.

>Go somewhere else .Whole tread I see, posters desperately wanting porn posted here.
you idiot government eployee it is not about wanting porn, it is about respecting the vital function of the male orgasm. it is a matter of healthcare. fapping is part of keeping the male organism properly maintained and it used to be the church who criminalized it in order to make the idiots more compliant and now you have been corrupted to believe the same nonsense as the medieval serfs who just had one thing on their mind: enslaving the male as to create passive income for their masters.

>The board quality is decent, watch it nosedive otherwise. If we listen to these coomers.
why do you believe in the meme of the coomer in the first place instead of understanding you are being hoodwinked by modern digital spam weapons. you are easy to trick man, watch anyone just train you to believe stupid shit. i watch porn a few minutes every other day to help in keeping healthy. otherwise i drink herbal tea, i read complex philosophy, i write, i meditate, i exercise, i dance, i build furniture myself, i give charity to retards, i do everything i can to responsibly and wisely appreciate the short gift of life and then i see guys like you who don't and it disgusts me. i am no coomer, i am wonderful and i am not in the wrong. the problem are you with your unsubstantiated opinions that you merely inherited uncritically. you are a boot licker!

you are dead wrong about the porn issue and both your lack of curiosity and your willingness to comply with nonsense theater is insulting to anyone aspiring higher levels of human existence. change your ways, stop being an idiot.

i am not talking about dumping gigabytes of porn and flooding the entire catalog, i am talking about the act of kindness of one guy sending another guy a nice wholesome piece of consensual porn every so often as a reminder to keep active and help that guy engage in proper healthcare and you foaming church-minion with the trans-vibes think it is fine to join in the idiocy of criminalizing male sexuality.

i tell you something you don't understand: the orgasm is important, it serves a vital function both in the physical and in the non-physical. touching yourself is natural and healthy and you shouldn't believe anyone who plays theater in front of you making you question your nature.

>>14113
>porn leads to weird community things. Like gay men posting ero or loli or whatever just to troll the userbase. I don't think we need it here

doesn't have to. maybe question your weak boundaries of what you are willing to tolerate and what not. i never wanted to see loli or gay shit ever. not once in my life. i never operated a website so it was never up to me but those things are disgusting to me and i would have had the balls to ban them directly without your wimp tip-toey approach of having to ban everything with a shotgun because you are too afraid to be called a bigot by evil shorthaired women who think they can hide their gray hair by coloring it purple or pink.


>>freespeach
>This is peak degeneracy
you're a transsexual and that's all there is to say about the matter, you are completely disconnected from male existence. i look down on you.

>>14111
>You can post nudity here, with a spoiler, within reason. I've seen it posted without a spoiler if done clearly for artistic reasons.

that's good news.

>You fail at your own reasoning: /b/, /s/, /gif/, etc. allows all the 'freedom of speech' porn you'd ever want at 4chan or other boards you clearly admitted are controlled operations, yet the actual topics and material covered here get you banned over there. 

i don't believe it does to be honest. there is a good chance that the porn that is posted there is just part of some thinktanks agenda and that actual users who wanna post porn are just banned and they would never tell you. i have been banned so many for such nonsense reasons by dirty government people, the rules they display are complete illusion. i find it more probably that you get banned there based on social credit scoring then on anyone actually applying rules. you have no reason to believe that anything that happens on 4shit is actual people actually talking. these are the worst people in the world with infinite money and infinite sadism. it is just a flood of filth. it is a zionist theater space.

>Why do you think that is? With one mouth, you claim it's a monitored glownigger hive-den only offering poison, then seem surprised this place isn't keen to host poison.

i'm not saying i am perfect and have it all figgured out and everyone should listen to me but i don't see the contradiction you are accusing me of. it is nice that you can say things here that you can't on the 4theater, i support and believe in this display of honor.

>>14112
>Though, now that I think about it, maybe it would not be such a bad idea, just so you see what that site has become.
or just read the epstein files directly if you wanna be depressed so bad.

>My point was that allowing porn is opening a gateway to shitting up the site, since it's the perfect tool to derail serious conversation.

but the point is it doesn't have to derail and just because it can derail you assume it always will and you are wrong about that. you have all the tools, you can spoiler, you can delete, you can ban, you can move posts in other threads, you already do it with spam, does porn stop your brain from functioning or is your dick so big that it impredes your arm from moving the mouse and thus can not delete it when it gets too much? what weak-reasoned nonsense. stop this theater.


>>>Smaller chans and forums struggle with CP
>>yes, please wake up. it is a digital weapon by cyberarmies used against small sites to force them to submit.
>So you recognize this and yet you refuse to acknowledge the point I made.
no not me wake up YOU WAKE UP. when i post a tasteful nude then it is not a cyberarmy and you pretending that you can not tell the difference is a lie, you are not that dumb.

>>maybe the porn you watch...
>All pornography is. 
no it helps you in getting an orgasm which is part of male maintenance.

>It is spiritually vain and materialistic. It binds you to the material world and its vices.
it is not the porn that is binding you, it is you being the co-pilot in your own life that binds you. porn does not have the powers you were tricked into believing it has. you don't turn into a mindless zombie when you see a nice looking vagina. it is not that powerful.

>And, above all, it makes you lust after other women if you are married while somewhat satiating your desire to find a real wife if you don't have anyone. 
you are just a simp.

>It is no cohencidence that most of the people in charge of pornography are jews.
no it's not a coindicence, it is bad people gatekeeping human desire to create passive income and power and the more you HELP in prohibiting porn everywhere, the more young people will pay for it, which i am against. there should never be any incentive for people to make money with porn, it should be purely the domain of those who willingly feel the creative urge to bless the world with their sexuality as a beautiful present to the world. think about how you helping in creating the porn monopoly by wanting it banned here. clearly the guilt is upon you.


>it is about restoring free speech online and stop limiting human expression
Look what free-speech-fagging has brought us: a majority of expressly left-wing sites which only allow leftoid opinions and a small minority of "right-wing" sites which allow trannies and glowniggers to derail conversation with pilpul and sophistry, if not just outright raid said sites and push their opinion through outright sheer numbers. 

clearly you are out of your mind and mistake astroturf theater with grassroot human deisire.

>Freedom of speech is desirable as a general freedom and on large, public forum sites, but if we don't have our own sites where we don't allow discord troons to raid and concern troll, we just end up having an open border policy and end up flooded with not niggers but trannies and pedos (which is arguably worse).

i'm not opposed to criminalizing troons and pedos, they are both just types of government employees.

>>there is no escape from the negative impact of the secret government agencies, they will negative your life no matter how you behave. 
>You sound like a fed, trying to scare everyone of how the mighty three-letter agencies already are omnipotent so you should totally just allow them to spam your boards full of porn, goyim.
i am saying don't be scared because they will not treat you better if you are compliant so your fear is without effect. you are doing them favors by being scared.

Sorry, there will be no coom opium on Our Chen

None of those ((( libertarian ))) satanic tactics work here, because here most are collectivist

>Sorry
you act like i was asking you for a handout which you then rejected, i wasn't. 

i was asking you to defend your principles to see if you are respectable and you were unable to, i did not lose a thing but i revealed to you how shallow your feminine model of reality is. so the proper way to admit intellectual defeat is not pretending i lost something and accuse me of the feeling you are experiencing (which unbeknownst to you is projection, you are using the word wrong) the proper way is to thank me for showing you how limited you are in your thinking and how easily you believe you can get away with remaining ignorant.

>None of those (((  libertarian  ))) satanic tactics work here, because here most are collectivist
there is no tactic involved, i simply revealed to you how little you have bothered to question your own actions: barely.

one thing is for certain: you either don't understand why you are really against porn or you are too ashamed to admit it. either way, disrespect upon you.

>>14120
>already went over how pornposting will shift the overton window, over to degeneracy as a normalcy
>hurr durr you have no idea why you are against porn
we want this site for serious discussion, not degeneracy. you are on a quest to have us accept porn. you are so avid to want us to view pornography, and share pornography.

>>14120
Why is it so difficult to just type in pornhub or xvideos or whatever the fuck for you on search bar?

Repent, cooker.

>>14119
This is the fed, ban this fagit at once

>already went over how pornposting will shift the overton window, over to degeneracy as a normalcy

that is not an inevitability and porn is not automatically degenerate. you baselessly insist this conveniently as to reach the outcome you are aiming for that you still refuse to be straightforward about.

>we want this site for serious discussion

your lack of serious discussion regarding this very issue contradicts this empty marketing slogan.

>Why is it so difficult to just type in pornhub or xvideos or whatever the fuck for you on search bar?
oh this must be you shifting the overton window towards pretending i have a problem finding enough porn and thus dodging the deeper issues which you have yet to address. this is not serious discussion, this is inferior accusation to change the topic towards something simpler you feel more confident in handeling: conflict. i said things about the male orgasm and male maintenance that you apparently are very uncomfortable about and probably surpassed your horizon.

no i understand what is really going on. either your woman posts here directly or she watches you post here and you are not in charge, your woman is and she forces you to be against porn and betray your fellow men.

fine be a traitor and join in the hostility against men but be straghtforward about it and don't pretend this is an imageboard, when this is merely an imageboard for women and husbands because there are a lot like me who are tired of the female limitations imposed, the anti male sentiment and the restriction of free expression and don't want any part in this bending yourself into a prezel for tyrannical women who want you weak and unhealthy so they have an easier time turning you into their personal soldier.

>astroturfing thread

>>14126
>>14125
>>14121
Are you fags still replying to this obvious shit-skinned dalit malaun that baked this thread? This thread belongs in /hell/, since the poster is obviously a brown pornsick jamboy posting outside of containment zone.

>>14135
does men liking to look at beautiful young women make you uncomfortable? sure sounds like it the way you are flailing...

>>14101 (OP) 
porn is bad
masturbation is bad
you don't even need to know why because it is in the Bible that Adultery is a Sin and you are not supposed to sin

>>14138
>you don't even need to know why because it is in the Bible that Adultery is a Sin and you are not supposed to sin

"god says it, i believe it, that settles it is" can never be the answer to "why?", it is not reason, it is a belief. i have beliefs too. i believe if you don't act in the best interest of your body you are a sinner. god didn't give you a body to so you can treat it like a garbage pile, you are supposed to take good care of your body and be in excellent mental and physical health.

>>14153
>can never be the answer to "why?", it is not reason,
It is an answer to "why", YOU just don't agree with it because you don't see God as YOUR "Father". I was exactly the same way. 
Think of it like something your parents taught you when you were a child. Let's say they showed you how to do math. You can disagree all you want, but if you respect their authority over you, then you will do the right thing without wasting time questioning trivial bullshit like the nigger baby you are
> it is a belief. i have beliefs too. 
the belief in His authority. If I didn't question God so much I wouldn't be jerking off, smoking weed, driving drunk, calling retards on the internet NIGGER! and suffering for my sins and the sins of my corporeal parents
>i believe if you don't act in the best interest of your body you are a sinner. 
That is exactly what makes you a sinner
I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. 2 Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.
Romans 12:1-2
>god didn't give you a body to so you can treat it like a garbage pile, you are supposed to take good care of your body and be in excellent mental and physical health.
What the fuck does that have to do with you wanting to jerk off? how niggardly are you!?!? Did you only see me say "God" and then get mad?

>>14155
>It is an answer to "why", YOU just don't agree with it because you don't see God as YOUR "Father". I was exactly the same way. 

no you don't get it. reason implies trying to understanding all the available information yourself and making an informed judgement based on critical inquiry to the best of your ability. that's what i am doing.

that's not what you did. you just uncritically accepted an opinion that may or may not be reasonable based on habit of obedience and that is why you can't argue the topic. you did not do your own thinking.

>>14157
>no you don't get it. reason implies trying to understanding all the available information yourself and making an informed judgement based on critical inquiry to the best of your ability. that's what i am doing.
No I understand it perfectly. If someone asked "why do plants need sunlight" you WANT to have it be explained down to the last atom humans have discovered to explain chlorophyll. You don't NEED any of that extra "knowledge" to explain the simple fact that " And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness." Genesis 1:3-4. The beginning of the Holy Bible
>that's not what you did. you just uncritically accepted an opinion that may or may not be reasonable based on habit of obedience and that is why you can't argue the topic. you did not do your own thinking.
No. I respect the authority of scientists explaining mitochondria, cell walls, and proteins. I've seen ALL the diagrams and got all straight A's all throughout school. And now I learned who has authority over the scientists. 
True obedience to authority isn't a "habit", it is peace

>>14160
>You don't NEED any of that extra "knowledge"

that's ignorance. you are saying god god gave you a brain and then taught you not to use it.

>>14171
>I trust that he will guide me 

the problem with that is that you are easily fooled by a group who just wants you to comply with what they have decided behind closed doors in smoke-filled rooms. since there is this group who for centuries has been developing expertize in manipuplating people (of which molestation, homosexuality and rape is one real aspect of, though i don't claim that this is all that is going on there) you can never be sure if god really speaks through them. they could use the bible and the institution of the church to get people to be how they want them to be.

the way you know whether your group is genuine in their connection to god or if they just trick you to be their pawn and soldier is in the quality of your religious/spiritual experience. if it feels alive, emotionally fulfilling, life-affirming, rejuvenating, electric, motivating,... then you know you were lucky to stumble upon the real deal.

some aren't so lucky. they are just in some boring tall building with a bell that they don't know has healing powers and the experience feels like bad theater, nobody is feeling anything, the people are bored and dead in their face and they are merely participating in this flat and lifeless occupational therapy to be polite and because they believe it is expected of them. that's not a quality religious experience.

i have no reason to believe you found the real thing and thus am more worried about you being misguided then guided. you don't think the feeling can be had in other ways then your group. you don't think other books have valid information in them. i guess you never experienced someone with a strong connection to god that wasn't part of your particular group, otherwise you would know it is possible.

>>14173
>the problem with that is that you are easily fooled by a group who just wants you to comply with what they have decided behind closed doors in smoke-filled rooms. since there is this group who for centuries has been developing expertize in manipuplating people (of which molestation, homosexuality and rape is one real aspect of, though i don't claim that this is all that is going on there) you can never be sure if god really speaks through them. they could use the bible and the institution of the church to get people to be how they want them to be.
>the way you know whether your group is genuine in their connection to god or if they just trick you to be their pawn and soldier is in the quality of your religious/spiritual experience. if it feels alive, emotionally fulfilling, life-affirming, rejuvenating, electric, motivating,... then you know you were lucky to stumble upon the real deal.
>some aren't so lucky. they are just in some boring tall building with a bell that they don't know has healing powers and the experience feels like bad theater, nobody is feeling anything, the people are bored and dead in their face and they are merely participating in this flat and lifeless occupational therapy to be polite and because they believe it is expected of them. that's not a quality religious experience.
So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
John 8:31-32
Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings!"
Acts 5:29
>i have no reason to believe you found the real thing and thus am more worried about you being misguided then guided. you don't think the feeling can be had in other ways then your group. you don't think other books have valid information in them. i guess you never experienced someone with a strong connection to god that wasn't part of your particular group, otherwise you would know it is possible.
“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.
Mathew 1:27

>>14174

if you don't even try to use your human brain and build your own thoughts and build your own sentences from those thoughts then don't bother using the bible to talk for you. do your own talking or stop spamming with your flat, lifeless, religious theater.

>>14175
A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery

>>14175
>>14176
To make that even shorter... 
Brevity is the soul of wit 
Shakespeare

>>14168 
>that's ignorance. 
I trust that he will guide me 
>you are saying god god gave you a brain and then taught you not to use it. 
I should use it as He intended. Worrying about irrelevant things is not what He wants  

This one was accidentally selected, that's why it was deleted... and then I edited it wrong

Is someone botting, or why are posts getting deleted?

>>14181
I deleted the wrong posts and also reformatted some wrong

b3146ca829347e974850adbfd727ff261bb0e0a9f455b814b80e327d7154269c.jpg
[Hide] (414.6KB, 989x1280)

178c94670c295a024c59775cca351d63ba32d26fd8526ccf38bf12a1c5199724.jpg
[Hide] (71.4KB, 680x545)

86cd628551d94298fe14cf452ab26c8177572a0ad7a3bec3186ec7a37439928a.png
[Hide] (638.4KB, 913x910)

8ed79a7a12ce0c516cd79ab42d31305459b258cb7a9cf7c82371584a36cf7e4e.png
[Hide] (444.5KB, 637x654)

5d0e6cdc41035a129e3bfaa4e965aac7733e9f90b57fdffb34c7255e46110df4.jpg
[Hide] (343.2KB, 1000x1000)

>>14101 (OP) 
>>14108
>>14109
>>14114
>>14115
>>14117
>>14119
>>14120
>>14131
>>14136
>>14153

Take a breath kike. 

Porn is bad news because it makes men too focused on bodies and body parts.  And it deadens your ability to have a real orgasm or seek out pussy because you're always fucking your hand.

I know a r*dditor who is the perfect example why nofap is important. He says nofap amplified his loneliness and now it has become unbearable so he seeks relief by looking at porn again. But he didn't actually become more lonely when starting nofap, it's that before he had the illusion of intimacy when he was staring at pixels on the screen and jacking off his dick alone in front of the screen. Nofap cut out the illusion and now he can feel his desires again. But instead of looking for healthy outlet for his desires he's craving porn again which would numb him out again. It's like taking painkillers to numb out the pain instead of fixing the underlying problem causing the pain. This is why porn is a trap to so many men. Porn takes away the pain of loneliness but at the same time closes opportunities for real intimacy. Understand that pain is not your problem but your lack of intimacy is the actual problem which you should focus on. Porn doesn't fix the problem it just numbs the pain so you will never do anything about it.

>>14186
Not who you are talking too but,
Everything thing you said is true
I recently started feeling anger and hang overs again because in the past, without me even seeing it, I have emotionally suppressed all feelings for all my life
I don't feel shame, pain or blame, but now I do and it is cathartic

>>14186
>Porn is bad news because it makes men too focused on bodies and body parts.
why can't men focus on what they think is right, why do you think you are the authority of male attention, because you didn't get any male attention?
>And it deadens your ability to have a real orgasm or seek out pussy because you're always fucking your hand.
you might get short term temporary dullness if you overdo it but that fades away when you don't. the alternative when you don't orgasm is that your penis literally deadens and shrivels and sperm production reduces, which cuts of the natural flow of male energy. if the penis isn't used to ejaculate, the cells can not offload their metabolic waste and you get stagnant in the dick which results in dickcheese. it weakens the man, which is why the stupid religions trick their braindead followers into being more obedient, sexual repression is what they did to repress their cattle for centuries.

if you like a man and want him healthy, he better be cumming a lot. if you hate a man and want him to be your slave then find a way for him not to cum. it is deeply intertwined into male health. 



>I know a r*dditor who is the perfect example why nofap is important. He says nofap amplified his loneliness 
ok cool i am not lonely. i have the opposite problem.

>and now it has become unbearable so he seeks relief by looking at porn again. 
I AM SO LONELY I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE, WHERE IS THE PORN GIMME THE PORN. some real quality people you choose to surround yourself with.

>But he didn't actually become more lonely when starting nofap, it's that before he had the illusion of intimacy when he was staring at pixels on the screen and jacking off his dick alone in front of the screen. 
does he understand that what he sees in the computer is not real life but just a lifeless recording or simulation of it because it doesn't sound like he understands it.

>Nofap cut out the illusion and now he can feel his desires again. But instead of looking for healthy outlet for his desires he's craving porn again which would numb him out again. It's like taking painkillers to numb out the pain instead of fixing the underlying problem causing the pain. 
i have never met anyone like that who had problems that were caused by porn. i resent that you try to find a retard on purpose and then act like what the retard experience can be generally applied to more men. again this is you trying to reach the conclusion that porn is bad and going backwards to rationalize it while not addressing the real reason. real reasons like the women who owns you forces you to speak ill of porn or that you are a physically repulsive women yourself who wants to limit access to desirable women, believing you can benefit from the gatekeeping of female attractiveness for selfish reasons.

>This is why porn is a trap to so many men. 
because you say one retard on reddit could not tell the difference between a video and reality.

>Porn takes away the pain of loneliness but at the same time closes opportunities for real intimacy. 
not only is that nonsense, loneliness is not a pain for men. you can't threaten a man with loneliness, that's not real. man is a part of nature, the birds are singing, the rivers are flowing, the mushrooms are growing, the snow is falling, how can man ever be alone. this is fabrication.

>Understand that pain is not your problem but your lack of intimacy is the actual problem which you should focus on. Porn doesn't fix the problem it just numbs the pain so you will never do anything about it.
you start at the point that watching porn is automatically a problem and that's already a strech. is porn a problem for you because you are a undesirable women and men would rather watch porn then fuck you?

>>14101 (OP) 
False premise, subhuman. No one cares about you in any capacity whatsoever.

bros I can't believe I'm saying this, but the site has gotten EVEN WORSE than the last time I checked in. It's like a decaying horse turd in a prairie, getting more decayed and fetid and disgusting in a mix of crap every single time I check in. Now we have

>joo jooo jooo jooo
>tyke tyke tyke tyke
every single thread, and it comes with
>muh masons muh conspiracy muh israel muh tykes
every single thread. Congrats schizos, we did it! Ourtyke is completely incomprehensible and gone to shit!

>[insert webm of Lauren Southern masturbating here]
>[insert webm of Ben Shapiro eating his sister's ass here]
>[insert jpeg of AOC gagging on Trump's cock here]

I've got alot of political figure fakes that I'd like to share here but theres not a board for it.
:(

A_rare_video_of_the_Pope_kissing_the_feet_of_moors.mp4
[Hide] (2.6MB, 720x732, 00:45)

>>14199
>False premise, subhuman. No one cares about you in any capacity whatsoever.

no part of that pathetic announcement is a valid reason for the false belief that porn is bad, ma'am. porn isn't bad. you are bad. having orgasms is healthy for a man, seeing pretty women is a life-affirming and wholesome feeling and it helps with fapping.

this must be a board exclusive for ugly women who get depressed when they see pretty women. nobody asked you to be ugly, you made the decision to be ugly, now live with it. may no man ever help any of your problems and turn away from you when you need help.

>>14221
Post them on 4chan

>>14230
>Post them on 4chan

so your overweight wife doesn't feel ugly? is this her safe space where she can post too from her ipad?

>>14241
You want to post porn, why don't you post it on 4chan? What's with all of this evasiveness are you insecure

HEy5kosbcAARGji.jpg
[Hide] (113.5KB, 955x1280)

>>14101 (OP) 
CP can easily be used as an weapon to shut down small image boards. Glowies are famous for doing this.

It's easy to slip in that video of an 17 yearold romanian girl with big tits who looks like an adult... it looks like an adult, but it's technically CP and now your image board gets shut down.

If you want porn, just go to 4skin and watch the content there. I hear their /gif/ is full of femboy and blacked content.

>>14249
this is also how they have a Canadian dude called mole man arrested for life btw. The glowies insert these jailbait things into people's telegrams and social media feeds or whatever knowing they will unwittingly download them. It's a very corrupt system

>>14243
>You want to post porn, why don't you post it on 4chan? What's with all of this evasiveness are you insecure

i don't even have porn to post that is small enough to be an image board attachment. it is about your malicious compliance with idiocy and the pathetic theater you struggle to uphold around it.

>>14249
>CP can easily be used as an weapon to shut down small image boards. Glowies are famous for doing this.

i have already been saying this myself itt. you can't even read the thread? read the thread there is no need to repeat yourself. makes you look dumb and desperate.

>If you want porn, just go to 4skin and watch the content there. I hear their /gif/ is full of femboy and blacked content.

i have plenty of porn, you try to make this about me but it is not about me and besides you are people of uglyness, you don't h ave it in you to post good porn psychologically, you'd post nothing but rape and cuckoldry because your psychology is not centered around consent and mutual resepect. it is about you being snakes and teachers pets and assisting in the eradication of female beauty and the deterioration of male health, all of which you no nothing about.

>>14101 (OP) 
The Roman-Catholic Church has been running an outsized operation for nearly a decade.  The christnigger resurgence you've witnessed is not organic, the institution was dying for decades.  Nothing about christniggery has changed, the dictates are the same, the universalists running it are the same.  These christniggers rely on convincing you that you were born evil/broken/sinful, and that you must feel guilty for it and seek forgiveness from their meme character (which the top dogs control the image of, like a puppet, in the minds of their goy followers).

I have yet to fully decipher Eric Blair's message on The Anti-Sex League; best as I understand it, sex binds the man to his family/idea and the state does not want competition for who's in the godseat.  I think much of the modern and even medieval state structures were semitic in origin.  Jews chop dick-ends off to arrest that bond and bind the victim to them through trauma.

>captcha every post
>no porn
Worst /b/ ever.  Death-of-irrelevance to all christnigger denominations!  Faggot choir boi board admin.

>>14257
>resurgence you've witnessed is not organic

could be, hard to tell. the more i questioned educational system the more i found out people have literally been bred to be desperate confused idiots because those are the only ones who would accept the mindnumbing peasant jobs and later factory jobs in a system that keeps evolving to put them at a disadvantage more.

what you say about the traumabonding is spot on. to someone who has never experienced happiness, waiting in the queue of misery, sex with someone attractive is the thing that they believe will make all their problems go away. no psychopathic powerstructure would leave a powerful natural draw like that on the table and not figgure out some way to be a parasite about it.

i soon start reading Wilhelm Reich, that dude has found stuff out about the orgasm and the government put him in jail and destroyed tons of his research.

>>14259
What did he find out about orgasm?

wilhelm_reich_-_the_function_of_the_orgasm_1927.webp
[Hide] (14.8KB, 325x500)

>>14262
i have not started reading it, i still feel like a reading novice and i try not to read too many books at once, currently reading Carl Jung and a book about sunlight but i geared the fuck up in preparation for his book already and got myself a external E-INK monitor that i can attach to the phone with one cable to have a 10 inch display to read pdf files. is the best monitor to use in the sunlight so i can read while enjoying the health benefits of the sun. 

from what little i have gathered the dude has discovered some kind of energy which the government hated him for and he thought the orgasm was a thing that could help all these damaged people around him in terms of mental health and spiritually. he wrote a lot of books on why he thought people were crazy, about the dangers of conformity and groupthink, i expect he will explain the details about the connection he found between vulnerability to absent-minded group-thinkers and lack or orgasm.

looking forward to reading it. reading has grown on me lately, for years i did not succeed in reading more then a book a year and all i could do was audiobooks while running or cycling. but reading e-ink + sunlight i discovered to be the perfect combination where i could finally enjoy it. 

for a while i thought video is strictly superior to book because you can see and hear the author express both voluntary and involuntary communication but i think i have watched too many videos. it feels tedious, often i do it in 250% speed and notice how i zone out. reading a book is like the thing the author distilled and i can read it as fast and as slow as i want. also i like how effortlessly i can pick up and lay down the (e-)book. sometimes i have like 2 minutes and i read 2 pages at other times i read a whole chapter or i read up until i don't understand something and need more time to think about it. i have been impressed by some people's video channels with dozens or even hundreds of fascinating videos but seeing some authors releasing 2 books a year over decades has impressed me more. industrious dudes like that have been living for centuries and with books i can read their best thoughts.

>>14259
>>14263
orgasm is not a magical woo property like quantum physics.
>he did the mass psychology of fascism
That guy is also a retard

SpecOpsTheLine_ThePainting.jpg
[Hide] (109.1KB, 800x450)

>>14250
If your an zioninst and they catch you with baby rape on your computer... nothing happens really. Slap on the wrist. Flee the country back to isreal while your at it if you want the right of return!

If you question the system and you have an porn cache that has an single image of an busty 17 yearold romanian chick... that's CP and your going away forever.

Stealth CP is an very fucking real issue. If I was to download porn, it would all be animated... because drawn anime titties are legal in most places except for texas.

>>14256 Your trying to upset the opsec of this board. No porn. Simple as. Makes it easy for the mods and makes it nice for the guys that may have had an porn addiction. Porn just an digital cigarette and some people want an smoking free place.

>>14272

you are just mindlessly repeating yourself at this point. i gave you every opportunity to prove you are respectable people and i conclude you are just clueless whipped brainwashed husbands and wives who talk about not liking israel but are too cornered and compliant to live out the freedom they are nudging you away from. 

if having it easy is your number one priority then why even have an imageboard when it would be easier not to have one. why even get up in the morning, just remain in bed, that's way easier for the mods.

>>14266
You say that while glowies keep remaking succgen generals on every imageboard. You're not very convincing actor, you should be killed, kike.

>>14275
degeneracy and porn as a weapon are very real. But sexual repression does not in itself cause fascism; Fascism is not synonymous with sexual repression and the escape-from-freedom or whatever other arguments of the Freudian pseudopsychology era.  

They also believed in these circles that orgones were like magical loosh energy. No. The desensitization of dopamine and creation of hypofrontality which porn causes is real, and is what you are talking about, but no magical orgasm energy is being stolen from you to power satanic ritual AI or whatever you think

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (53.9KB, 250x162)

>>14276
>desensitization of dopamine and creation of hypofrontality which porn causes is real

you normies will fall for every single narrative. just repeat it often enough and you will accept it as fact.

the guy who was never happy once in life, never succeeded in creating the difficult environment for this short-lived flower of happiness to blossom, talks about his dopamine... if only the dopamine was a certain way...

>>14278
Porn desensitization is quite real and you can look up how it works. It is not in doubt that hypofrontality results from fapping too much

>>14279
>from fapping too much

you keep assuming irresponsibility

>>14280
Let's see your pattern of reasoning here:

>unfounded dismissal
>personal attack
>next up call me an XYZ

I can't believe people are actually paid to do this, it's pathetic honestly.

>>14281

>Let's see your pattern of reasoning here:

no lets adress why you repeatedly insist that everyone who watches porn must be such a bumbeling retard that he better wears a helmet as to not hurt himself.

that is an attitude you decided to bring to this conversation.

i guess you understand yourself how dumb it is, can't defend it and now you have to pretend that you barely knew epstein.

046e1f30c3bdc997f8d4227dcd95a687.gif
[Hide] (2.1MB, 320x240)

>wait why can't we post porn
>well everyone i guess let's sit here and talk about porn
You people are fucking hopeless.

>>14284
It's a glowie trying to turn this site to shit.

>>14286
yep. You can tell who they are based on the TDS. Don tzu was the tell. The old knockoff nationalism was when Israel took over everything and redirected it towards zionism, the new knockoff are these interloper false fronts that show up claiming to be nationalists for [failed country xyz] despite zero material evidence to validate that support and plenty to the contrary

IMG_2918.jpg
[Hide] (309KB, 876x584)

>>14286
>>14292
>>14284
i'm not a glowie, you just can't handle being wrong and you hate it. you'd pull the fire alarm of the building to avoid being proven wrong, you are more slippery then the eel.

porn doesn't make you a retard, not watching porn doesn't turn you into an enlightened masters. denying yourself your basic human needs turns you into a pressurized human who is only good for violently obeying other people's orders or repeating what your boss said. you are low iq henchmen without dignity, the exact kind of people who would work as a glowie, corrupted fat obedient losers who will obey every order, follow every rule but never understand why.

>>14299
you might not be but there was 100% a glowie on here earlier

>>14299
Shut up kike, go die for your own country you disgusting coward.

>>14302
>but there was 100%

i've been called a glowie on this site all the time so when you say 100%, that doesn't mean anything because it includes the times you have been wrong about it about me. when you call me a glowie and i am not, then i know you just call anyone a glowie.

your feminine approach of calling someone a glowie and then thinking you can judge by the reaction whether that person is a glowie or not is not working. this will never solve the problem. it will just make you look desperate and stupid. reaction testing is not working. they know how to respond to make a dummy like you believe otherwise.

now i am just as worried and desperate about the malevolent infiltration of evil government employees trying to enslave humanity like you but at least i am not slowly turning into one like you.

i don't have a solution either. the people need their own internet where the government is not allowed in, that'd be nice. government trash out of the internet is what i am saying. they have their own military internet already, they use the people's internet just to wage modern war against the people. their kind of war is making people dumb and the more i talk to you, the more i can tell they already succeeded with you.

map_of_gaylord_mi.jpg
[Hide] (126.4KB, 772x670)

>>14299
You're clearly a midwit at best, but let's think this through:
>you're defending going to an all-but-dead imageboard 
>in the armpit of the internet 
>a place with a strict "no porn" policy 
>and since you can't post porn here
>even though you're literally accessing the internet
>a place where the sickest most depraved shit anyone can imagine is just a quick search away
>you want to come here and 
>discuss porn
>with other men
>then defend it with evolutionary psychology
<durrrrrrr monkeys do it 
<why shouldn't i
Yeah, I guess. If that's all you aspire to. Being a hairless, chronicly-masturbating ape that can't control his own urges and, when not currently engaged in the process of satisfying those urges, have an extreme need to discuss that process of satisfying those urges.
With other men. 

Even if you're not a glowie, which I doubt anyway, you're a degenerate fucking fag.

>>14309
every single time you misrepresent me and repeat your narrative while ignoring what i say. that's centralized intelligence way of communicating. call me glowie all you want, it is you who posts like them.

so whatever i am going to say, you will continue to miss the point and repeat what you have already said as if i had not heard you the first time.

>>14310
>call me glowie
That's exactly the opposite of what I said.
Why are you misrepresenting what I said?

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (129.1KB, 687x667)

>>14315


can you see where the arrow points or should i draw the arrow bigger as to make it easier for you to see what you said. the arrow might be a bit too small for you to notice, that's why i'm asking.

don't mind me treating you like you are dumb, that's what you get for acting dumb.

you call me degenerate and glowie while it is you who plays dumb and only read what you are able to handle while conveniently failing to adress what goes over your head. selective perception as a result of your brainwashing and your personality deficiency of reacting with hostility to anything outside of your externally authorized group-think reality.

again i ask you why do you assume everyone who watches porn is a degenerate. i'm not a degenerate, i don't play dumb the way you do. you must think playing dumb is this brilliant chessmove that can save you from looking foolish but there are parts of you who are ashamed of you every time you play dumb while i am sincere. remember that you have to live with yourself after you are behaving disgracefully towards me.

drag-syndrome-8-768x960.jpg
[Hide] (142.2KB, 768x960)

>>14367
>he said he doubts i'm a glowie that really means he thinks i'm a glowie
>200 words of knocking down that strawman
Imagine being this retarded.
I don't think you're a cop, but I do think you're a gay, retarded, illiterate faggot.

>>14368
>Imagine

isn't the first thing that you gave up when you decided not to use your own brain anymore and have your thinking done by others? your imagination?

imagine how much smarter someone is who uses his own brain in comparison to you who only listen to whoever is loudest and to whatever is repeated most often.

assburger_disapproval.png
[Hide] (358.5KB, 866x675)

you've done a poor job of defending your values. you baselessly insist that porn is degeneracy but i don't believe this is the driving force behind your decisions. this is just the least repelling sounding pretense you were able to come up with. 

the real reason is that you have not questioned the validity of your cultural background, which is one of subservience and slaves are trained to deny themselves part of their humanity to appease their masters. the demonization of porn is the acceptance of the boot and the subsequent licking of aforementioned boot.

some kids believe a little bit too hard in santa clauss and other kids are suspicious or even outright reject parents treating them like retards and lie to them. you belonged to the kids who never thought of questioning santa and you have so much work to do catching up to do to the children who were suspicious that it feel like just being in your presence is a draining punishment and a waste of time.

good luck with your imageboard though. just operating an imageboard is a noble endeavor which i can respect even when it is just for people who choose not to think for themselves.

48b4a591d125b3e50ced23a839378c6c9b032134458d429ee20141a9d9f836fc.jpg
[Hide] (898.4KB, 640x875)

>>14407
you can goon to Five Nights at Freddy's futa 3D porn all you please like your idol Jeffrey Epstein, we just don't want it here is all. Jewish-styled 'gotchas' aren't going to change the culture established last year, as this isn't reddit.

aa591b113af3cf9df1375f46af7562a4b5a2c77bea89077734c7749aa4034315.jpg
[Hide] (27.1KB, 500x375)

Sexual liberation is always used as a form of political control because lust (like every vice) darkens the mind.